|
Probably goes without saying but those fish are probably serious choking hazards for an infant, given size and composition. So like, make sure your 2 year old isn't chewing on it?
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2016 22:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 2, 2024 20:26 |
|
|
A little reading suggests you're only required to include a choking hazard warning on your packaging and advertising if the product is a "toy or game" and "intended for children ages 12 or under." I think the fish are nominally "toys," so you'll have to decide what age of customer they're "intended for." That said, if you included a hazard warning just out of an abundance of caution, that probably wouldn't be hard or expensive. A typical warning is: "WARNING: CHOKING HAZARD – Game contains small parts. Not suitable for children under 3 years." The relevant laws are the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) and the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
Just remember that warnings and disclaimers don't exist to protect consumers or the public. They exist to protect manufacturers from consumers and the public. If you are a manufacturer, you should absolutely view them in that way.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
It is a whole lot more like attacking a car reviewer for not doing motorcycle reviews, because they feel motorcycles are too dangerous. That does not in any way undermine the car reviews. 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2016 00:01
|
|