Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Serrath
Mar 17, 2005

I have nothing of value to contribute
Ham Wrangler
InTrade apparently doesn't exist anymore but it used to allow you to place money on events occurring and buy and sell already placed bets before the event took place. The price of these bets, though, was reflected by what people were willing to pay for the right to bet on X event rather than the actual odds of that event occurring. Because the market price for the presidential election was reported in news cycles as having some predictive value, Mitt Romney surrogates routinely bought out bets for Obama to win the election, inflating the price of his bets and making it seem like his probability of winning was higher than what vegas odds were predicting.

If you placed large bets when these buy-outs were occurring, you could get your bets matched 1:1 (or even better) late enough in the election cycle when it was obvious that Romney had no pathway to victory and vegas odds gave 80+% probability to Obama. You could buy an option for Obama to win, set your automatic purchasing program to purchase it when someone was offering odds better than even money, and by the next day someone will have bought you out.

There were a number of other high-profile events where the betting was impacted by people more interested in manipulating the perceived odds than winning the bet but this was the most egregious example.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

raton
Jul 28, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Kuato posted:

Winning is fun, which is why I gamble. I also make OK money so can absorb losses. My boss brings in 10k to the Casino every other week to play with; its basically walking around money for him. Lucky bastard.

Please get him to play poker

raton
Jul 28, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Serrath posted:

InTrade apparently doesn't exist anymore but it used to allow you to place money on events occurring and buy and sell already placed bets before the event took place. The price of these bets, though, was reflected by what people were willing to pay for the right to bet on X event rather than the actual odds of that event occurring. Because the market price for the presidential election was reported in news cycles as having some predictive value, Mitt Romney surrogates routinely bought out bets for Obama to win the election, inflating the price of his bets and making it seem like his probability of winning was higher than what vegas odds were predicting.

If you placed large bets when these buy-outs were occurring, you could get your bets matched 1:1 (or even better) late enough in the election cycle when it was obvious that Romney had no pathway to victory and vegas odds gave 80+% probability to Obama. You could buy an option for Obama to win, set your automatic purchasing program to purchase it when someone was offering odds better than even money, and by the next day someone will have bought you out.

There were a number of other high-profile events where the betting was impacted by people more interested in manipulating the perceived odds than winning the bet but this was the most egregious example.

Welcum to my hedge fund

  • Locked thread