Lunchmeat Larry posted:

cheers!

and yeah by "minimal effort" I've been modding heavily since Morrowind so I just mean "will take less than a week for once"

Nasgate posted:

I'm 100% convinced that the weird sexmod authors are actually the most normal people that are active in the modding community.

docbeard posted:

I do assume that the completely hilarious bug I got where bandits I was mind-controlling with Illusion magic became so loyal that they actually wrote me into their wills was down to OBIS.

FutonForensic posted:

No ziggurats unfortunately, though this replaces the forests with jungle. Looks ugly imo.

KingFisher posted:

Reformatted the drive rinsed and repeat of the above, same thing CTD on new game....

Gyshall posted:

Mod piracy has been banned for a while now

Lunchmeat Larry posted:

GreatGreen posted:

I'm no lawyer, but these two paragraphs don't really seem related to me.

Paragraph 1: "If you distribute a mod you make, you're saying it's OK for Bethesda to do anything they want with them, without acknowledging or paying you, and you can't sue them."
Paragraph 2: "This means you have a copyright to your mod."

It does? I didn't read anything in that first paragraph that specifically details how a mod belongs to a modder, just that Bethesda can do whatever they want with mods. Those seem like entirely separate concepts to me. Are you saying the fact that Bethesda says they can do anything with a mod implies the modder has a copyright for it that Bethesda must provide stipulations against, otherwise Bethesda wouldn't need to say anything at all? That still doesn't seem water tight. If I say "hey don't fly away" to a person then I could be implying that they're a goddamn bird but that doesn't legally make them a bird. In the same way, just because Bethesda feels the need to state that they can do anything they want with a mod you make might imply that it belongs to you, but that doesn't mean it does.

To put it another way, if Bethesda allows you to vacation at a beach owned by them, and they specifically state that you are allowed to build whatever kind of sand castles you want on the beach, but that they have the right to do whatever they want with the sand castles, that certainly doesn't mean the sand castle belongs to you and that you can dig it up and take it home at the end of the day.

Another thing, and I'm not sure if this has happened, but even if modders did have copywright to their mods, all it would take is for Nexus to get mod hosting permission from Bethesda and all this is moot anyway. If Bethesda can do anything it wants with mods, and it gives Nexus the rights to host them, then the Nexus is legally in the clear no matter what modders legally do or don't have copyrighted.

Renditious posted:

From the Nexus TOS:
" By submitting content to our services, you are granting an infinite, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license for Nexus Mods to store, distribute, copy or reproduce, edit, translate, reformat, publicly display, or perform the submitted content, at our discretion."

So it looks like they did exactly that. So they don't seem to have even been obligated to allow mod deletion in the first place.

Ra Ra Rasputin posted:

Can we just agree that both oblivion and skyrim's writing was garbage? no need to try and measure them like "ok this sandwich is covered in 45% poo poo, but this other sandwich is only 32% poo poo and one side is almost clean enough to get a bite in"

Ain't nobody thinking back fondly to the oblivion quest lines and thinking "drat, the king of worms was a great story" or "the fighters guild questline is in my top 100 rpg questlines"