Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Skeleton Ape
Dec 21, 2008



Germstore posted:

"orbiting something that outputs energy" is a pretty low bar to set for habitability.

Yeah but the more we learn about life the lower the bar gets. Look at water bears and tube worms and stuff. There's probably some extremophile bacteria or something that would do just fine there

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Skeleton Ape
Dec 21, 2008



Decebal posted:

Yeah but what if life needed a milder environment to start and only then it can evolve into extromophiles and conquer inhospitable places ?

Yep, maybe (probably) there's nothing there. But it's far from impossible

Skeleton Ape
Dec 21, 2008



Decebal posted:

That would also be a good target (besides endless Mars missions). They dropped the Huygens probe on it but it only had, like 1 hour of battery ?! WTF why not make one of those plutonium batteries for it and make it float ???????? imagine that thing sailing on a methane sea and peering into the depths !

Huygens was just a little bonus probe tacked onto Cassini, not a dedicated mission, so it had even tighter cost and weight constraints than usual. There's a proposal (not sure how serious at this point) to do exactly what you're suggesting in the future though.

  • Locked thread