|
Luigi Thirty posted:Anyway speaking of dead white people, Maricopa County is left with one insurer on its insurance exchange because the second pulled out because they couldn't raise their rates 120%. 14 of 15 AZ counties will have one insurer and one county will have 0. Obamacare is great. To be clear there's only one on the exchange, you can still get whatever through work.
|
#
¿
Sep 4, 2016 16:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 18:55 |
|
|
Cause he's stupid.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
Oh well that's fine. She already was going to do that anyway.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
Chelsea is going to run it, Bill will also be cutting ties.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2016 02:40
|
|
|
How do you take a shower so hot steam is permeating your watch. My wife takes showers like that and if I try I feel like I'm getting second degree burns.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
This election makes no loving sense. Why the hell would Trump be catching up?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
I'm sick and tired of hearing about her drat emails!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 14:42
|
|
|
icantfindaname posted:She purposefully walked a razor's edge rhetorically to avoid taking a strong position either way. But the basic problem remains, that Hillary people literally cannot deal with anything other than complete loyalty and party line-toeing, and throw a screaming baby tantrum at anything else You're the one throwing a baby tantrum about not having complete loyalty to some progressive line toeing.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
Periodiko posted:Huh? They discovered a ton of potential conflicts of interest with organizations like Saudi Arabia, which clearly do not support the underlying stated missions of the Clinton Foundation, obviously (if you're not being willfully obtuse) donating in the belief they'd receive some kind of favoritism. In other words, nothing. Look at all these "potential" "could have" "donors thought they might"
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 16:07
|
|
|
All of CNNs are like that. Their polls don't get enough responses from 18-34 year old to make a statistically significant crosstab. It's not them cooking the books, they just don't have enough data to display results for that group.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
icantfindaname posted:How is it not correct? Did 85 of 154 people she met not donate to her foundation? Do you understand how the English language works? No, it's not an assertion she ran pay to play. It's a factual thing that happened that strongly points to pay to play. Like I said, just come out and say the media's not allowed to report facts that portray Hillary in a bad light beyond what you decide is OK, you're not exactly fooling anyone Do you think as Secretary of state for four years Hillary Clinton only formally met or had phone calls with 154 people? That's where the manipulation of. 85 of the 154 people (on this list of people we made) that Clinton met donated. She met with a LOT more people than that. That headline leaves out the parenthetical, in a very dishonest fashion.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 16:19
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:
They just don't have the ability to contact a statistically significant number of people under 34 using their methodology.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
Like why the gently caress would anyone have a landline.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 16:42
|
|
|
icantfindaname posted:Just the fact that she looks incredibly corrupt is an entirely valid reason not to vote for her. A democratic election is not a trial in a court of law She only looks corrupt to idiots.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 17:18
|
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Clinton folk push back hard because we're tired of all the bullshit accusations. Pushing back is evidence of guilt!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Oh right forgot we're in Cardassian court. Denying guilt is almost as much a sign of guilt as saying nothing, and that's almost as signifying of guilt as a guilty plea!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
That explains why Bill is a serial philanderer. Hillary Clinton touched his penis, corrupting it. She is likely a phazon being.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
I'd say it's more that at such a high level conflicts of interest are literally unavoidable.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
Did Olivia become a journalist because her last name is Newsie? It's a pretty good reason tbqh.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
straight up brolic posted:It's sweet that Democrats nominated Hilary because she was "more electable", but she's turned out to be arguably more poisonous with the American electorate than the least qualified, most vile candidate in history. Democrats nominated her because she's the better, more qualified candidate and is better at campaigning.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
I think it was a joke
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 13:38
|
|
|
How Hillary wins the debate. Trump: Says something Clinton: If you believe that, you should go ahead and change your name to Donald CHUMP.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 15:16
|
|
|
There's a lot of undecideds in that poll and those undecideds favored Obama over Trump 54 - 10 so I think she'll do just fine. Oh also she has campaign offices and a get it the vote effort there.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
I'm glad Phyllis Schlafy lived to see legalization of marriage equality and society's burgeoning acceptance for transgendered people. I only wish she could have lived to see Hillary Clinton elected president.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
Gozinbulx posted:I don't loving know but it is amazing to witness. This forum has gone from the most (appropriately) cynical take on American politics to shilling hard for what amounts to a status quo neoliberal hawk with nice platitudes towards minorities and middle ground kind-of progressive pledges which she may or may not pursue when in office. Yeah of course Republicans are horseshit hypocrites when they try to attack her, of course they make up tons of bullshit about her that not real scandals, of course Trump is literally the worst in every single way. None of that precludes her genuinely problematic traits and her garbage rear end incrementalist never-really-progressive politics. I too will GLADLY vote for Hillary Clinton in November, but it doesn't mean I have no delude myself into thinking shes actually a president I want. Probably cause we all loving grew up from eight years ago. Check twelve years ago the forum was a bunch of libertarians.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
Didn't the homophobe funding chick fil A money to anti gay PACs die a couple of years ago anyway?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
Is the underlying assertion of that lovely graph true?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
Explain the tweet please to those not watching
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
No one really knows for sure how many members of the military are.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
iospace posted:Yeah, it's why I'm now more confident about the first debate. This event, while short, gave people a taste of what to expect. Wallace is probably on edge now because he was probably planning on moderating like this and Lauer is getting destroyed right now. You act like Wallace has any shame and doesn't have a job at Fox for life
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Well? What is it?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 12:54
|
|
|
What's Syria?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 12:56
|
|
|
7c Nickel posted:You see Johnson's problem is that he admitted a weakness by asking what Aleppo was. If he had just started bullshitting "Well it's a very serious problem and we'll have to look closely in the coming days next question." he would have been fine. A stream of verbal diarrhea gets you a few funny looks, being weak is punishable by death. You're not wrong. I guess it is partially to his credit he asks a question when he's unsure rather than bullshitting. Not nearly as much as if he has actually known of course, I'd prefer voting for someone like Clinton who actually knows things.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
Why'd you break up
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 18:17
|
|
|
loving whites
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Yup. What happens to men like that when they finally lose that dominance?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:Married With Children covered this well I think They have hot wives constantly begging for sex, and disrespectful but fairly low maintenance kids?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
Aesop Poprock posted:*video game comes out focusing 100% on tits* In Japan this character was 14. The translation says she's 18, and that's censorship. Now watch me dox an unrelated employee of the company and prove she's an escort and get her fired.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:What the hell is with this 14 -> clothed 18 year old drama, is this a recent thing? No specific event, I was just generalizing. Though the person who got fired after a harassment campaign ended with them somehow obtaining information she was moonlighting in "another job that wasn't consistent with the companies values" was a very real thing.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 18:55 |
|
|
Hey fairgame, is not installing flash stealing? Cause I'm not going to do it, and most ads run on flash.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 22:02
|
|