|
Skip here for the current topics to debate or attempt to influence your delegateArticle V of the Constitution posted:The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. We're gonna re-write the constitution! The time is now, present day. A mixture of right-wing conservative states in conjunction with deep-pocketed interests like the Kochs have joined with a few vindictive liberal states and gotten the necessary 38 states needed to call for a Constitutional Convention. The game is set in modern day, but for the sake of discussion, ignore that it is an election year (though certainly if you'd like to re-legislate how elections will be run, by all means do so!) America hasn't had one of these since the first one, and nobody really knows what's up for grabs. What I'm proposing is a roleplaying play-by-post game where 10 lucky* posters will get to post as the delegates for a block of states. I've split them up into roughly equivalent populations; for the simplicity of this simulation/game, each poster who represents a bloc will have 1 vote. 1 other poster will be the Supreme Court, with the power to break ties, should they come up. I'm hoping to get one article voted on per week or so; I'll take the role of "Speaker" just to bring articles/amendments up to be fixed if no one does. Voting will be by email to npcdel@gmail.com; debate should generally happen in this thread, however vote-trading is totally acceptable. Feel free to declare a surrogate to vote for you if you don't think you can make the floor in a given week. Some topics you might want to bring up:
The blocs available are: NCR - Cat_Herder Las Vegas Phoenix Salt Lake City Denver All the big square states Midlands - My Imaginary GF St Louis Kansas City (both of 'em) Topeka Milwaukee Oklahoma City Libertopia - DivineCoffeeBinge Chicago Pittsburgh Cleveland Cincinnati Texas - Loel Texas Appalachia - Random Paul Nashville Little Rock Lexington New Orleans Cascadia - Seiferguy Seattle Portland San Francisco Los Angeles CSA - Elmnt80 Atlanta Birmingham Miami Tampa Tidewater - Quorum Charleston Research Triangle Park (Raleigh-Durham) Washington, DC Baltimore New York City - Xiahou Dun NYC Also Staten Island! All of New York State I guess And New Jersey New England - RagnarokAngel Boston Philadelphia Bangor Kanakaua - Rafza Hawaii Alaska Puerto Rico Microstates like American Samoa, Marianas Island, etc. Post in this thread to claim a bloc. If the bloc you want is already claimed, post anyway and you'll be the surrogate in case the first claimee flakes after a week. Questions welcome! E: Thanks to Quorum for this map:
Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 16:03 on Sep 5, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 04:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 06:35 |
|
Schedule: 9/2: Week 1 (Ends 9/5): Delegation Arrives (everyone claims blocks by posting, initial intro/greet your fellow delegates) 9/6: Week 2 (Ends 9/12): Discussion of what topics to cover over the next ten weeks. Email of your top five things to amend/add/delete are due to npcdel@gmail.com 9/12: Article 1! The Congress! Make sure your favorite useful idiots can get their jobs done and bring home the earmarked pork! (I'll be linking this post to the post starting each week) Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 01:29 on Sep 12, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 04:35 |
|
Quorum posted:So while creating a Debate & Discussion Constitution would of course be all sorts of fun, implementing Full Communism and Effort-Posting Earns Citizenship, it'll be more fun if we actually try to serve the interests of our regions primarily. Old-style regionalism is way more rad than sectarianism. That was my thinking, too. I've updated the OP to reflect a direct PM link to the various delegates, for when you guys need to do shady smoke-filled rooms deals. My hope was that you would soft-role-play as someone at least nominally representing the interests of (in order) your donor class, your industries, your political dynasties, and last (and least) your constituents. Having two items a week to debate and discuss will let vote-trading occur. DivineCoffeeBinge, New England was already claimed, but TriState (NYC/NJ/CT) is wide-open, if you'd rather have your own bloc than serve as an alternate.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 16:06 |
|
DivineCoffeeBinge posted:I'd rather serve as an alternate; I know NE and could effectively roleplay its interests a bit more than the Tri-State area. Sure, that's how it was in real life, so why not? ALL SPOTS FILLED However, if you're interested in being an alternate should the original delegate not respond/post, definitely post here! Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 22:50 on Sep 3, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 17:20 |
|
Xiahou Dun posted:Can I rely on you to not doxx the hell out of me, or should I use my SA-only bullshit cut-out e-mail? I give you my no-doxx guarantee, though you could send via PM if you don't trust an 11-year poster
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 17:57 |
|
Quorum posted:Incidentally, because I am at work and it is deathly dull, I created a map with my interpretation of the blocs as set forth in the OP. Feel free to throw it up there for those of us who are visually oriented if you like, or let me know if I got something terribly wrong and have offended the touchy people of Shitsville, Kansas or something. This is gorgeous and just about exactly right, only change is Hawaii has elected to vote with New England because reasons. e: lol you updated it.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 18:23 |
|
DivineCoffeeBinge posted:I am suddenly struck by the thought that Philadelphia being represented by the NE bloc is perhaps a little unusual, given that the rest of its state is within Libertopia and from a geographical standpoint it's got the NYC bloc in its way (E: and might be culturally closer to Tidewater). I made Elmt80 the delegate for the CSA since nobody's claimed it yet, but if someone wants it, Elmt80 did originally want to just be an advisor/delegate. If you take Libertopia (originally titled Rustopia, but that was a bit on the nose. I'm thinking now it makes more sense?), that means we can start the show?
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 20:34 |
|
IF YOU ARE NOT A DELEGATE! Check this map for what bloc you are in (per your IRL home) and post in this thread for the constitutional things that matter most to you: (thanks to Quorum) The Delegates are set! Again, if you'd like to be an alternate (in case your bloc's delegate flakes out), let me know via PM. Your bloc leaders are (with links to PM them): NCR - Cat_Herder Midlands - My Imaginary GF Libertopia - DivineCoffeeBinge Texas - Loel Appalachia - Random Paul Cascadia - Seiferguy CSA - Elmnt80 Tidewater - Quorum New York City - Xiahou Dun New England - RagnarokAngel [img][/img] Kanakaua - Rafza Delegates, you have until September 12th to submit your list of things you'd like to make sure make it in to Constitution 2: Law Harder Some things to keep in mind: The constitution covers the following issues:
Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 16:03 on Sep 5, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 3, 2016 23:11 |
|
Loel posted:For the purposes of voting, do we need a simple majority (6/10), or two thirds? (7/10) E: Actually, per PM: My Imaginary GF posted:Mr. Adams, please trust your convention delegates. Let us put it to a vote what constitutes a majority vote! EDIT EDIT: : I put it to the delegation! Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 00:33 on Sep 4, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 00:13 |
|
SpaceCadetBob posted:Can I get a clarification if CT is NYC or New England? Want to know which PM box to pester It's New York's domain. Yell at Xiahao Dun
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 00:53 |
|
Basically, I was shooting for "as serious as we can be," treat this as if you were representing a voting bloc in a real constitutional convention (whatever that means). OF NOTE! -You can't exactly re-write laws; that's the legislative branch's job. You're just here to ensure the powers to do it, and to maybe outline some things that are necessary and proper, like say "the government should run the postal service" or "copywright should exist" (things that are there now - but maybe we should take a look at!) I'm expecting some of you to show up with "full communism now" platforms, to which I ask: are you sure your constituent states and donors want full communism now? Also, you are heavily encouraged to pander, drink mint juleps and/or attack each other on the floor with canes.
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 02:02 |
|
Loel posted:OP, when you have enough platforms can we expect a weekly agenda to argue over? ie Yes. On September 12th, the first week's debates will put two (possibly more) items on the floor. Six days of negotiation, then a vote. September 19th, two new items. Repeat until we have a functioning constitution. If anyone wants to take a stab at a new Preamble, go nuts. "We The People..." doesn't really sing; what about "We the Corporations..."? RandomPauI posted:This are not the final positions of apalachia, they're merely reflective of preferences of the Delegate from Apalachia, a region suffering from unemployment, natural disasters, and rife for being deligated by a beloved populist. He may have been recovering from a hangover while typing this position paper.
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 02:04 |
|
DivineCoffeeBinge posted:
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 06:08 |
|
Loel posted:Thats a good point. Obviously. Also I see you sneakdooring "churches can engage in political speech" up there
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2016 16:19 |
|
Rafza posted:I understand Hawaii got swallowed up (by the east coast of all things) but if Texas can have its own thing, I'd like to represent Hawaii. Hell, give me all of the Pacific territories while we're at it. Well then, lightning round time. Delegates have until 12:00am Tuesday morning (Pacific) to vote on this issue! I'm sending a form via PM, please don't break it. OOC: Does anyone have an idea for how to effectively do polls and share them with the 10(11 soon?) posters? The PM system for SA is bunk because I have to send 10 messages, can't use commas in the recipients line. I guess GMail would work, but I don't have everyone's email yet.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2016 00:09 |
|
HiHo ChiRho posted:Aside from the status of where CT lies, My important issue as a resident of NYC/NE is this:
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2016 00:55 |
|
Without 2 more yea's, Hawaii will not receive its full representation. Write your delegate now!
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2016 02:16 |
|
Also this is a good chance to remove the racist reference to'savages' in the original document
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2016 02:30 |
|
Rafza posted:I would be fine with this, as well as including Puerto Rico in as well with the Pacific territories Elmnt80 posted:I vote against hawaii being a seperate voting block. It would grant too much power to a single small state that does not represent the wider necessities and desires of the country at large. The current vote is for an 11th bloc to be created consisting of Hawai'i, Alaska, Puerto Rico, Marianas Island, America Samoa and the various other Pacific conquests. WRITE YOUR DELEGATE!
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2016 02:39 |
|
Rafza posted:I understand Hawaii got swallowed up (by the east coast of all things) but if Texas can have its own thing, I'd like to represent Hawaii. Hell, give me all of the Pacific territories while we're at it. UPDATE! With a much closer vote than expected, the motion is carried, and Rafza becomes the 11th delegate from the bloc of Kalakaua. We welcome our island friend, representing the diaspora of American interests worldwide. Aloha!
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2016 15:41 |
|
Nobody's transferring anything. For one, opening remarks start tomorrow. For two, Dixie already has the world's largest airport and Miami as a shipping hub. If you take New Orleans as an industrial center away from Appalachia, they have literally no economic hubs of note.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2016 16:05 |
|
Effortpost! Welcome all to the 2nd Constitutional Convention. I'm happy to see my fellow distinguished gentlegoons in the thread today. As a reminder to those at home across America, your delegates are: NCR - Cat_Herder Midlands - My Imaginary GF Libertopia - DivineCoffeeBinge Texas - Loel Appalachia - Random Paul Cascadia - Seiferguy CSA - Elmnt80 Tidewater - Quorum New York City - Xiahou Dun New England - RagnarokAngel Kanakaua - Rafza If you'd like to be an alternate (in case your bloc's delegate flakes out), let me know via PM. The docket is as follows: This week: Ratification of the preamble, open discussion on topics, formal submissions. Some things to keep in mind: The constitution covers the following issues:
Some topics you might want to bring up:
PLEASE SUBMIT, VIA GMAIL TO npcdel@gmail.com YOUR 5 MOST-IMPORTANT UPDATES/REVISIONS/AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION. This can also be things you want to ensure stay, such as no British troops quartered in American homes!! OOC: Currently, there will be a GoogleDoc with tabbed tables for you to vote. I WILL NEED YOUR GMAILS TO ADD YOU AS AN EDITOR. ALL WILL BE ABLE TO SEE, BUT ONLY YOU TEN CAN EDIT.
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2016 00:59 |
|
Current Preamble:quote:We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Proposed Update: quote:We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. No major changes, a typographical update to a modernized version of the word "defense." If any members wish to propose additions/changes, now (this week, before September 12th) would be the time to do so. Also, consider (given the existing text and amendments) what your five most important issues will be. We'll be ratifying whole blocks of the previous constitution a week at a time, with debate and voting on each section over the week (I'll provide a first-draft update, and we'll discuss which votes to carry, with a vote the following Sunday.) Amendments/changes, if not directly addressed in the constitution itself, will be at the end of the convention. OOC: So, for example, if you think your bloc would like to do away with the USPS, be sure to include in your 5 changes/additions: quote:1) Article I, Section 8.7 - Fakeopolis would like to strike this line. Instead, "The US Gov't shall create a genetically hyperintelligent breed of passenger pigeons" Let the debating and discussion begin. Again, VOTES FOR YOUR FIVE **MOST IMPORTANT** ISSUES ARE DUE 9/12. I do encourage you to work strategically in the open; if you know everyone's gonna put "get rid of guns," you can probably safely put "universal child care" in your five. In case anyone's curious, my five are:
Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 01:21 on Sep 6, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 6, 2016 01:11 |
|
Dr. Angela Ziegler posted:Welcome all to the 2nd Constitutional Convention. I'm happy to see my fellow distinguished gentlegoons in the thread today. RagnarokAngel posted:Oh that is it. Duel on the floor, now. 49 minutes from opening gavel to physical violence. Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 01:56 on Sep 6, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 6, 2016 01:54 |
|
Loel posted:
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2016 01:17 |
|
Xiahou Dun posted:PS if anyone knows good GIS search terms for an NYC as gently caress politician, please help. I have this idea in my head but I can't quite formulate it. Basically like sleazy but more liberal de Blasio??? Don't gently caress with the classics.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2016 01:31 |
|
You guys are making me want to have a legislative thread after the CC wraps up...
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2016 02:33 |
|
HiHo ChiRho posted:fixed that for you lol adding 7 states from Mexico would be amazing. So long outsourced jobs. Hello 14 democratic senators.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2016 02:43 |
|
RandomPauI posted:(OOC, are we agenda setting or voting for amendments?) The only thing going on this week is hashing out what your top five things are, and whether we change a c to an s in the preamble, unless you want more radical changes to the preamble. Sep 12 is when the craziness starts
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2016 15:15 |
|
VanSandman posted:Who's supplying the copious amounts of booze for this convention? It is in my interests that they are purchased from Tidewater-region alcohol makers. Tidewater is welcome to provide cartons of their fantastic tobacco products, but all bourbon is to be supplied from Appalachia's stores of Pappy Van Winkel and Maker's Mark.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2016 18:57 |
|
I've updated a list of the issues facing this grave body, and am keeping it close to the vest until all the delegations have responded via email to npcdel@gmail.com. Next week is Article I, which covers the legislative branch. This means congresscritters, voting/election changes and the actual scope of congress. I'll also be offering the chance to ratify "Appendix A: Treaties" which will read with Loel's wording of 'the following treaties are ratified, nyah nyah' or whatever. Your state needs you, now more than ever! Also, be sure to log in to The Convention Calendar and update your vote for changing the letter c to the letter s in the preamble (on tab 3). It's important just so the nation can all see how voting will go.
|
# ¿ Sep 9, 2016 23:05 |
|
Sen. Early Cuyler (R as all hell - GA) has spoken. More entitlements, less welfare
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2016 01:42 |
|
Welcome all delegates to week 2 of the constitutional convention. The motion to amend the preamble to update to modern conventions of spelling has carried, with the next phase being the re-writing of Article I, the section on Legislative duties and elections. After the delegates making their wishes known, I've presented a version here that addresses many of the delegate's wishes related to updating this document. Changes are in BOLD, or for those of you eager to ban guns or institute universal health care and equal rights, I promise that is coming. This whole "what is a Constitutional Convention" is super-interesting, and I'm guessing that they'd give a quick first-pass over the original document before moving on to new amendments. Without further ado, Article I
I'm not sure if stuff like UHC and Infrastructure as a right belong in Section 8 here, or as their own amendment. Feel free to argue over their inclusion. Sometime around Wednesday, I'll throw up the whole text as an up-down vote. If it is not ratified, the original 1789 text shall be adopted in full, no changes, including the a head slave tax that is really fuckin' shameful, so let's make sure we don't do that, yeah? Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 22:19 on Sep 17, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 12, 2016 01:22 |
|
Just as an additional heads-up, the distinguished gentleman from St. Louis, representing the Midlands, has advised this gentleman that he wishes to adopt the original text, "as the founding fathers perfected it," in its entirety with no changes other than typographical.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2016 01:31 |
|
RandomPauI posted:OOC: Request for clarification. What is the current makeup of the senate? 50/50 split? OOC: assume current split and trends (ie, likely to swing back to D control soon) Also, note that the presidential appointments and "no congressional stonewalling" stuff goes in Article II, under president-y stuff.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2016 01:47 |
|
Loel posted:Amendments
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2016 05:50 |
|
Loel posted:Ok, Im clearly not understanding the process. For the next week (or until such time as it is ratified and adopted) only Article ı, and changes germane to that section, are under review. I promise we'll get to the good juicy "fix the country" bits, but proposing new amendments is a little bit off. Also, amendments are technically unnecessary if we amend the original text (for instance, the 16th ceased to be, as it now simply in Article 1, section 1)
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2016 06:12 |
|
seiferguy posted:Just a heads up, I'm out with little to no Internet so I hope there's a delegate to help on my behalf! There is, it is SolKanar512, the Swamp King
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2016 21:22 |
|
RandomPauI posted:OOC: Just to be clear, we're voting on keeping Article 1 as is OR adding one vaguely worded part and removing two other parts of it. Yes, essentially. Feel free to propose any other changes to the document as presented, including ripping out whole portions. If you can find 5 delegates to agree, you can do basically anything to article I right now. If you like the way it looks, pop over to the google doc and just bubble in a yes vote. If we get six "as presented" yes's, we can actually move on to Article II, which I know everyone is excited for, because that's the "un-gently caress the EC" article. The real fancy stuff is in Article I, section 8 - which includes the copyright and patent length, currently at "whatever congress wants" but certainly amendable to any duration by adding that length to the line-item. Debateably, you could also add UHC to this, but I think that stands out better as its own amendment. Shrecknet fucked around with this message at 22:03 on Sep 13, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 13, 2016 21:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 06:35 |
|
My Imaginary GF posted:You have packed this convention hall as if you were FDR trying to destroy our courts; you have diminished the voice of true delegates in order to promote an agenda of rule by law rather than rule of law. The delegation from the Midwest is welcome to call for another constitutional convention in 230 years, after this document is implemented and the kinks ironed out over a few centuries. If your plan is pure abstention, you'll need to work with other dissident delegates, since most members (yourself included) joined this venture because you believed in change and updating this staid document. I look forward to your contributions beyond objecting vociferously to allowing our most marginalized citizens in outlying regions like Hawaii, American Samoa and Puerto Rico finally having a voice in our government.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2016 22:32 |