|
Gobias Ind. posted:Langford and Jones imo Jones for sure. That chemistry should translate to at least the beginning of the season. John Brown is still iffy on health, and there are "a lot of mouths to feed" As for the RB, that's tougher. I think I'd go with Forte, as much as I hate Forte. The Jets are going to want to showcase him, Cincy's D is probably the worst of the group of 4 you presented. I don't like Henry because he's still second RB and while we expect him to emerge as a top play, that will probably take at least a few weeks, and from what I've read the initial gameplan is to lean on Murray when the team is up (which they should be against Minnesota). I don't like Stewart because A. He's Stewart and B. Denver. Langford is a close runner up, but I am nervous because, and please correct me if I'm wrong because this is purely from memory, I think Langford is better when rushing around the Tackles, which is where Houston is its strongest.
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2016 03:33 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 12:25 |
|
Mikey Purp posted:Agree. Here are a few Im wrestling with: 1. Ware. Abdullah still needs to show he's gonna get more than 5-10 touches per game. Gore might literally be a better blocker on Indy than any of their front 5. Ware is going to get work, and SD's defense seems suspect also: Yikes, not fun... But still gotta 100% got with Jones because I'll take a starting RB over a RBBC from a team that might just throw it 70% of the time.
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2016 04:16 |