|
"is fat shaming wrong" is an open question. "is being fat shameful" is not.
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2016 14:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 00:22 |
|
|
I feel bad for every fat person who has ever been forced to read a GBS fat thread. Just terrible.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2016 18:27
|
|
|
Frosted Flake posted:Q: Are there fats in countries with conscription? I can't imagine any amount of Swiss chocolate will keep Hans fat while he rucks the Alps. No, the genetic diseases that cause obesity are restricted to the US,UK and Mexican populations.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
I don't see how any GBS fat thread is making fats feel self loathing. I guess waddling in from places unknown and not clicking on the GBS fat thread would takes too much self control.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
Gaunab posted:get a load of this fatty can't argue with waist to hip ratio
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 00:14
|
|
|
it's literally a fat woman fetish
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
Falun Bong Refugee posted:What's the SS? That's how they name ships so it must be hilarious. Super Saiyan
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
Falun Bong Refugee posted:But for real, yo. Most people don't grow up understanding the basics of nutrition. They don't know that a g of fat is 9 calories and a g of carbs, protein is 4. They can't even do that math. That's an institutional failure that cannot be blamed on an individual but must be held accountable to society at large. Simply Sara is just as god made her (with a little help from wanda's pasta salad).
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 12:12
|
|
|
calorie intake unrelated to weight, gbs threads directly to blame
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 12:26
|
|
|
I remember fat shaming in the 60s. You had to pay a quarter to peep a real fatty. A dollar if you wanted to throw a tomato at him. That was a bit of money back in those days.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 12:39
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:yes, nothing says "shitpost" like links to scientific studies This but unironically.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:lol I don't have a BA, I'm a programmer computer science should really be a BA (source, I have a BS in computer science).
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 13:56
|
|
|
even if it is counterproductive I don't see what that has to do with GBS fat threads. "Ahhh, a GBS fat thread I bet this is a place I can get positive affirmation for my lifestyle." *click* "Cr-criticism!" *shoves mini-apple pie down throat*
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:01
|
|
|
Are we pretending behavioral science is actually science now?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:08
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:Are we picking and choosing the science we want to believe in based on whether or not it agrees with our worldview? No. Behavioral science is literally not science. Cherry picking individual studies also isn't scientific because of the severe selection bias involved in paper publication.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:33
|
|
|
To put it in a way even programmers can understand:
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
In behavioral science it is almost always too expensive to have a proper sample size or to actually repeat studies. And it would be too immoral to actually use the scientific method so it tends to be more data mining than science.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:46
|
|
|
I know, but the point it makes is valid.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:48
|
|
|
Obviously I understand why you can't take 2000 people put them in the same daily situation except for their scientifically administered shame dose, but you'll forgive me if I take less stock in those studies when taken in isolation.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:53
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:so where are your studies about the positive effects of shame? Or are you going to continue Rick Perrying it up? I will continue to call you a baby goon for linking random abstracts you googled.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 14:56
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:I hope you won't mind if I continue calling you a self-loathing piece of poo poo who puts other people down to feel better about himself are you trying to make me fat?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 15:02
|
|
|
And I'll have you know I'm very nice on and offline. I only give people poo poo on GBS where it's completely consensual. In fact even on GBS I don't go into threads that I know I disagree with just to call people assholes.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 15:05
|
|
|
Frosted Flake posted:How many nurses and EMTs have ruined backs because of fatties? it approaches 100%, but if you think about it the real monsters are people that say "fat isn't healthy" on a plainly labeled thread on the shitposting subforum of a comedy website.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 15:19
|
|
|
Runupon, what is your concern? Is it that the "healthism" woman will stumble across a GBS thread, open it, and be so shamed that it scuttles her imminent return to a healthy weight?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:The people in the photos/videos are GBS posters? Sorry, I didn't know when someone comments on your wrong opinion on a completely different site you get a psychic ping that causes shame and makes you eat more.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
You see some people have gut bacteria that can pull an extra 5% of calories out of food or something, so thus there must be no connection between diet and weight because frrrrrrrrrrrt
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 17:53
|
|
|
Can I believe that pushing back on HAES nonsense isn't the same as fat shaming?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:You can, but it very much depends on how you're "pushing back". rolling my eyes when I read something about it, and making snarky jokes in gbs. it may not be doing any good, but it also doesn't harm anyone besides making you go aggro for three years straight
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 18:28
|
|
|
Carmant posted:It hurts peoples feelings thats not good maybe they should stay out of clearly labeled gbs fat threads. it is a safe space for venting frustration about the health crisis facing our nation.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
runupon cracker posted:oh good job then, carry on I will.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Carmant posted:It hurts peoples feelings thats not good Carmant posted:Yes you are Carmant posted:Congrats on not really accomplishing that much and then not even being able to maintain what little you did accomplish I guess. Thats a good reason to be really smug lol, you dumb piece of poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Carmant posted:Shut the gently caress up bitch suck on my dick, friend
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
Carmant posted:Finish melting down first I dont want to burn my mouth, fucker i'll melt down in your mouth
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
The easiest way to lose weight and get in shape is to become a lumberjack in the mountains of Canada.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 13:47
|
|
|
Carmant posted:Youre stupid, sorry. I'm starting to think you aren't being ironic.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 13:54
|
|
|
If he isn't being ironic or trolling then he made a sincere 'fat shaming is wrong' thread in gbs so being fat is the least of his problems.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 14:01
|
|
|
I would imagine a not-fat would be an expert on being not-fat.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
Carmant posted:Okay yeah I'm fat, 5'3 and 250 lbs so not quite obese but a little more weight than I'd like. I'm still fairly healthy and I exercise every day. I'm not saying you can be morbidly obese and being in perfect health but it's not like you'll die at 50 from being a little overweight. Oh no I won't live an extra 3 yrs or whatever, big deal. that is (e: morbidly) obese my good friend. e: 44.3 BMI. okay, I'm back to thinking this is a troll. Germstore fucked around with this message at 14:26 on Sep 15, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
No one could think a BMI in the mid 40s is a just "a little more weight than I'd like" right? Right?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 14:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 00:22 |
|
|
We're either being trolled or this is the greatest gift ever bestowed on a fat thread.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 14:43
|
|