|
NotWearingPants posted:the all y'all demographic A Bernie supporter hating Southern Blacks? What is this, the primaries???
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2016 05:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:57 |
|
|
Lastgirl posted:
Cool Vox article about CSPAM.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
Moon Atari posted:It's already succeeded actually. Trump conceded Obama was born in America, which after years of arguing he wasn't in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary makes him look, once again, like an idiot who can't stop running his mouth only to have to backpedal soon after. At this point every second statement from trump is an apology or correction. Saying Trump started the birther movement is a bit of an exaggeration, but he was its highest profile member and was the main party behind the long form birth certificate argument after everyone else had given up (and of course years after Obama's long form birth certificate had first been put on public display). More importantly, Trump's birtherism is evidence of his extreme lack of credibility and conspiracy ideation to all but the alex jones fringe. Drawing attention to it is an obvious strategy. Saying Trump started the birther movement is a bit of an exaggeration, because Hillary's 2008 campaign team started it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
Moon Atari posted:
Please don't try and pass yourself off as an expert
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
Frosted Flake posted:They're super serious! I feel like the idea of Trump not meeting "what is required of a presidential candidate." comes up a lot, and I'm not sure what people think is required of a Presidential Candidate aside from the age and citizenship stuff, and whatever other details.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 14:26
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:I'd rather have Hillary than a psychotic goofball that the rest of the world laughs at...look at this poo poo...he pretends to be his own publicist to brag about women, then admits to it AND THEN GOES BACK AND SAYS HE DIDN'T DO IT: Actually him pretending to be his own publicist is really funny, and a reason to vote for him.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 14:50
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:Not quantifiable is not the same as 'it's hard to define so it doesn't really matter' which is what was being insinuated. "I'm not sure what is really required or why people care about it It's fine for people to care about different things in their preferred president. Heck, you should probably vote based on your preferences!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 20:25
|
|
" is what was said. Maybe a good qualification should be 'not easily trolled by comments making fun of physical quirks like small hands.'
|
Nonsense posted:Romney - 500 generals endorse I wish the CIA, Bush Foreign Policy team, and Henry Kissinger wouldn't endorse Hillary. It's bad optics.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:Sure but let's not pretend like any rear end in a top hat could do a good job because all that's really needed is some conviction and pluck. I think conviction and pluck would be two great traits for our next president, actually.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
Knight posted:A campaign is a preview of how a candidate will run the office. I would write-in George W. Bush before I would give Trump a chance, after watching his campaign. It's not a decision. Well a vote for Hillary is a vote for W, so you will get your wish kemosabe.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 20:41
|
|
|
Knight posted:I thought Hillary was more of the same of Obama, but if Hillary is W, too, then it's all W's all the way down. It's as if Obama, once separated from skin color and party affiliation and the minor details that make one half of the country loathe him instead of the other, has basically pursued the same ends as W.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:All I know is I'm getting my options straddles ready for Election Day I'm eager to find out how my investment advisor doesn't have any hedges planned for election day because they just can't forsee anything leading to a sudden panic.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
Please everyone, vote for Trump. It's my suggestion.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2016 05:18
|
|
|
There are entire whole candidates who have not raped people, but they believe in a tax plan that people don't like.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2016 12:29
|
|
|
It's kind of neat to think that in our lifetimes we're going to see a great power completely collapse and disintegrate under the weight of its own irony.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
opus111 posted:lmao loving hell: Hillary Clinton rules because the democratic party platform speaks more to me than the republican one. IM loving EXCITED. reallivedinosaur posted:this article doesn't give even one reason why "hillary rules"? Yeah, this.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:It's a dumb article but to be fair there are multiple paragraphs illustrating what the author likes about Clinton, starting with "Clinton is pro-choice" and ending somewhere around "shrewd, savvy, tough politician." Sharing (hopefully! she only recently decided Gay Marriage is ok!) the same political views you'd expect of any major Democrat running for office is definitely a 'totally rules' feel.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
How could Obama have ever managed to pass legislation in the face of the GOP? As you can see from the past year, they're just an unstoppable, unbreakable juggernaut.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
How could Obama have stood up to the Tea Party? Why, he'd have to be smarter than a dipshit hotel owner to pull off that feat.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:57 |
|
|
cuck cuck im gay posted:I didn't say I put my faith in the Supreme Court. I said if Romney were president, the makeup of the Supreme Court would have been obviously different, and we'd still look like backwards idiots re: same-sex marriage. How would Romney change Obama's first term appointments?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2016 03:25
|
|