|
https://twitter.com/ChrisWesseling/status/778040408408412160/
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2016 08:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 06:42 |
|
The problem is there is still a bias in favor of white quarterbacks at many levels so you end up with fewer great QBs in the NFL. That would happen with any position. If people thought white people were better defensive ends, you'd have fewer great defensive ends in the NFL. So, end racism, problem solved.
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2016 08:14 |
|
Chilichimp posted:To be fair, QB opinions vary wildly year to year, and given your previous assertion of "taking their whole career into account" I can understand your rankings. I think you need another category between adequate and complete poo poo. You could call it "bad" or "crap" and move names down from adequate like Fitzpatrick, Cousins, and Tannehill. Also, I think you can move Wentz up into the "Really Good/Above Average" category. It's been 2 games! v I concur NotWearingPants fucked around with this message at 17:19 on Sep 22, 2016 |
# ¿ Sep 22, 2016 17:16 |
|
BiggerBoat posted:I've always wondered what the one most consistent stat is for winning teams versus losing ones. Obviously it's PPG vs. PPGA, overall, but what translates into that? I'd guess it's turnover differential and yards per play differential. I think it's the W/L% BiggerBoat posted:NFL stats can be weird to make sense of in a vacuum. "Total Yards Allowed (or gained)", which is how the NFL rates offense and defense, can be deceiving because teams that are up big give up a lot of garbage yards and trailing teams gain a lot of them. Like how it's hard for Carson Wentz to put up big numbers when he's always up by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2016 18:28 |