|
I saw a thing saying that lurkers should just post, and whilst I'm not much of a lurker here I haven't seen this broached in my skim-reads of this thread. I have always wondered how people know they've picked the right religion/the right version of a religion and I'm interested to hear some thoughts on that, if anyone's happy to tell me any. Whilst I appreciate that not all religious institutions/individuals have the same "If you don't believe exactly what I do then you're going to Hell!" thing, as I understand it there is usually some degree of feeling that your version is the 'correct' one to some degree or another and I find that interesting because it's something I just don't have context to understand. So... How do you know you picked correctly?
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2016 18:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2024 21:22 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:I notice in your post here that you seem to be talking about what I would say are several separate issues, and it's not clear to me if you realize that many people consider them separate. One is the issue of how people approach religious, cosmological, and philosophical ideas in terms of truth and authority. Another is the issue of how someone believes their chosen understanding of truth and authority relates to other people who do not have the same beliefs or life experiences that they do. These aren't the only ideas in your post, but these two are very large ideas on their own so let's just stick with them for now. People do reason about their experience, but I am struggling to think of another situation (with that said, the poster who pointed out that it's probably similar to political leanings I think made a good point that I hadn't considered) where there is so much to choose from in terms of schema surrounding an experience that then translates into traditions, beliefs, actions etc. I suppose something like "How do we all know we're seeing the same thing when we talk about colour?" is also similar, but on the whole language then steps in there and makes it a mostly moot point in a day-to-day context. I get the feeling that religious/spiritual belief systems have less of a... default? for lack of a better word, solution. We can also debate things like the existence of the table in front of us, and all those other classic philosophical things, but ultimately the vast majority of people will behave the same around that table regardless of whether or not it could be argued to be something other than that which it appears to be. On the other hand it feels like the nature of a deity, creation, and how those relate to one another and the person thinking about them has more possible 'solutions,' causing people to act in vastly different ways based upon their interpretation of these. I suppose the purpose of my post was more to ask for individual experiences of choosing the 'right' religion - whether that's just because it works for them, as has been said in response, or whether it's because it feels more factually correct. Which may be the separation you are referring to at the start of your post? I hope that made sense, I'm super tired but didn't want you to think I'd posted and abandoned!
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2016 16:58 |