|
Smoking Crow posted:if you're going to complain to someone, complain to rodrigo diaz, i based mine on his milhist op If you complain to me I will do to you what St. Dunstan did to the Devil
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2016 00:43 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 00:10 |
|
Keromaru5 posted:Yeah, I go to a Greek church, and most of the women there keep their heads uncovered, except for a few convert families. lmao I'm glad it's not just Russian churches that have this problem. quote:When I first started going, someone told me it had to do with when the Greeks were under the Ottomans. pfft, no. It dates back to the ERE and was adopted by the Rus at some point after their Christianization, but before Third Rome Theory. HEY GAL posted:it's making me think: does anyone here know how native Alaskans fast? #JustConvertThings
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2016 21:27 |
|
Cythereal posted:Defenestrate this, ye of the pikes and fancy hats. Hegel probably likes all of these. The first two look like prisons, the last one looks like some kind of retro-future euthanasia clinic, or maybe a white leather couch turned outside-in.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2016 03:43 |
|
HEY GAL posted:the problem with famous people who convert to orthodoxy is they immediately start writing about orthodoxy Netiher Tom Hanks nor Troy Polamalu do this, and they're both fine as far as I'm concerned.
|
# ¿ Oct 5, 2016 02:10 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:i used to go to Catholic mass with my ex girlfriend when we'd go visit her family, and the monsignor at that parish gave sermons that were engaging and had jokes. on the other hand i think every one i ever heard was mostly an explanation of church doctrine, which for me was a very different experience. maybe it's a traditional Protestant thing, but i would say that 99% or more of the sermons I've heard in my life were primary based on the lectionary readings of the day In my experience Orthodox sermons try to link the Gospel reading to explaining an element of doctrine. John Chrysostom's Pascal address is the apex of this of course, and imo the only sermon you ever need.
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2016 03:36 |
|
HEY GAL posted:Fantastic post, Metternich 1. A key reason for this is most preschismatic Western churches have had their art destroyed, either by protestants or the pope (stealth protestant) edit: also by things like fire, war and flood (also stealth protestant) 2. La Martorana, Monreale etc are not "Western" art any more than other Byzantine art is. Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 11:05 on Oct 16, 2016 |
# ¿ Oct 16, 2016 11:00 |
|
HEY GAL posted:would you say the same about ravenna? No that predates the sharper division between the two found in later artistic styles. quote:point is, people who were (albeit distantly) related on one side to me, instead of my friends Bronislav and Fyodora, built the drat things and this is important to me. when i see art like this it reminds me i didn't covert to a religion that was disconnected from what i see as my own history First of all there's no such thing as a bronie slav, how dare you. second I'd say that your history probably isn't fully Western either, for as much or little value as the word has. Disinterested posted:That's why Palermo Cathedral is so interesting, it's got all sorts of stylistic elements. I cried in La Martorana both because it was extremely beautiful and because the baroque addition had damaged the mosaic. Ever since then I have never forgiven the 17th century or the people in it.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2016 11:28 |
|
Il Pup-a
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2016 14:12 |
|
Mo Tzu posted:course i wonder what the point is with white people making christian rap when rap is already super religious at times (and not just at award season either). kinda like why i don't get why white people do nerdcore when hip hop is nerdy as poo poo already I mean there aren't that any rap songs exclusively about media I in particular consume, and my entire identity is based around those intellectual properties! Also im racist
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2016 11:03 |
|
Ceciltron posted:Any of you have HOT TAKES on Unitarian Universalism for me to better understand them, beyond my cursory wiki reading? OK if Christianity is Socialism the Orthodox are Mensheviks the Catholics are Stalinists, the Lutherans are Trots, the Calvinists are anarcho syndicalist, and the unitarians are crystal healers. Mormons are mussolini c. 1919 Edit: I know barely anything about these different branches of socialism I just wanted to make a joke. Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 15:46 on Oct 23, 2016 |
# ¿ Oct 23, 2016 15:42 |
|
Tias posted:As an anarcho-syndicalist, I will ask you to refrain from making the comparison, it would make both anarchists and calvinists sad No.
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2016 22:39 |
|
Spacewolf posted:Actually, Orthodox and Catholic goons, that's a good question - are we screwed if someone blows up the diocesan chancery and takes out the records of, say, baptismal certificates not held by a parish? I don't think it would be a problem but also I don't think we have baptismal certificates. That's a weird concept to me tbh.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 14:39 |
|
Mo Tzu posted:cythereal the next time you see a discussion like this and decide that your contribution should be something along the lines of "your thing is weird mine is normal," you should write out your post on a piece of paper, preferably a notebook, and put it under your pillow before you sleep. and when you wake up in the morning read it again. and if you think you should still post it, what you need to do is take that notebook and throw it in the garbage because no you should not. Ty for phrasing this better than I could. Tuxedo Catfish posted:you'd think the answer is obvious but i looked up "christianityball" and it's a bunch of jokes about Mike Pence electrocuting people Where I think you are missing out is that they think this is good
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2016 12:41 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:
Let now the astrologers, the stargazers, And the monthly prognosticators Stand up and save you From what shall come upon you. Behold, they shall be as stubble, The fire shall burn them; They shall not deliver themselves From the power of the flame;
|
# ¿ Nov 25, 2016 06:51 |
|
Astrology doesn't just run into the problem of falsehood leading to sin. This is a valid issue, but, as St. John Damascene points out, belief that celestial bodies control us personally is a rejection of free will. St. Gregory of Nyssa concurs with this. St. Gregory the Great writes from a different but also interesting perspective, that "Man was not made for the stars, but rather the stars for man; and if a star can be called the ruler of man, then man must be considered the slave of his own servants." This is of course a reference to the creation of the world in Genesis.Paladinus posted:Even if you consider everything as God's domain, it's still, in my opinion, dangerous to seek God's immediate and active presence in every aspect of your life. More often than not there are no signs, sometimes thing are just happening as a consequence of someone else exercising their free will. If you are want God to give you a cool custom sign composed of enormous gas giants across galaxies for what to wear today, you kind of put God to the test that is easily failable if something goes wrong because of the decision you made based on a perceived sign that you (or an astrologist) interpreted a certain way. It is more honest to just flip a coin embracing the relative randomness of the result, without thinking that God himself personally flips that coin with you and it lands in the best possible way that God intended to. Or if something bad happens out of the blue, and you start to blame God for not sending you a sign. I like this line of argument. Would you see it as a former of selfishness? Tias posted:drat it goons, stop arguing about stars It's probably easy for a heretic for me to say, but all denominations are marriages of convenience, and you are obeying the positions of your bishops, not your God. shut the gently caress up. This is the most interesting discussion the thread has had in a long loving time. Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 14:09 on Nov 25, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 25, 2016 14:07 |
|
Paladinus posted:
The thing is this is also what the church fathers argue. John Damascene lays it out thusly: "But we hold that we get from [celestial bodies] signs of rain and drought, cold and heat, moisture and dryness, and of various winds, and so forth, but no sign whatsoever as to our actions. For we have been created with free will by our Creator and we are masters over our own actions. Indeed, if all our actions depend on the course of the stars, all we do is done out of necessity (fate, in other words); and necessity precludes either virtue or vice." Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 20:53 on Nov 25, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 25, 2016 20:46 |
|
pidan posted:I don't agree that free will works like that. The human soul is shaped by all kinds of factors outside the individual's control. If not being "masters of our own actions" means there is no virtue or vice, then there isn't any virtue or vice, because people react to situations in predictable ways. So how does free will work, in your mind? quote:Also, astrology is typically used to predict situations and tendencies, not the actions of an individual. "Predicting situations" (inasmuch as they directly involve humans) through the planets is fatalism, and thus heresy. I also think your notion of what astrology is "typically" used for is mistaken. Here's part of my horoscope for 2017: This is a year on fire, pouring energy into your work, career, and creativity sectors. The January Sun-Pluto conjunction keeps your ambition and work ethic sky high. The separating Mars-Neptune conjunction makes sure that emotions, lofty spiritual ideals, and instincts are not left behind. It is explicitly predicting my thoughts and judgement. This is heretical and sinful. It's bad. if you use astrology to do anything other than predict attitudes and actions based on the motions of celestial bodies, you are no longer practicing astrology. But if you are in fact practicing astrology you are committing a sin.
|
# ¿ Nov 25, 2016 22:06 |
|
For the guy who asked: there were bursts of interest in astrology in the Byzantine period (the Alexiad mentions some) but it was consistently condemned by the Church. Other forms of divination exist of course. Seances were popular in 19th/20th century Russia. Greek grandmas like to read tea leaves and interpret dreams, and these may have been medieval customs as well.
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2016 15:15 |
|
JcDent posted:So, ugh, how do we deal with the "any theory that can't be proven false is dogma" thing? I ran into that quote on Civ VI and in a Maddox post recently and I don't want to give my OCD more ammo. I mean, you probably answered it somewhere in the dialogue with Joseph Bugman (nice av, by the way), but I am not that smart. Holy poo poo I found him! The one guy who still reads Maddox
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2016 15:56 |
|
Bel_Canto posted:just ban everyone, convert or not, from writing or teaching about the faith in any public authoritative context for a minimum of 20 years after their confirmation, with every exception to be reviewed personally by a bishop. private faith talks with your friends? go ahead. but no teaching or publishing on catholic theology until you've lived a couple decades as a normal catholic I'd knock it down to 10 years with the potential for a lifetime ban. If you don't get it by 10 you're never getting it. Edit: I just noticed "convert or not", I'd bump the minimum age to 20 for this, sure. Double edit: I'm mostly kidding but I do think there should be some kind of minimum time investment before youre ordained. That said, Jonah had been Orthodox for a good 15 years before he was ordained so it doesn't stop everyone. Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 13:52 on Dec 9, 2016 |
# ¿ Dec 9, 2016 13:43 |
|
syscall girl posted:I take it you didn't like alanis morissette in dogma Nobody should like anything Kevin Smith does.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2016 02:31 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:tusk is great I hope I can disabuse you of this notion: https://twitter.com/thatkevinsmith/status/2554608773
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2016 04:29 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:you're just jealous you've never had your dick powned Certainly not by that most erogenous of zones, the taint.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2016 05:08 |
|
Pellisworth posted:Grandma always said, anyone who's lived through a real winter knows Hell is cold, not flames. As anybody who's been touched by real heat knows: what loving difference does it make
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2016 09:14 |
|
HEY GAL posted:everyone should be baptized with a saint/holy figure's name, the catholics do this as well This isn't necessary (though it may be a good idea), and the issue of the prime mover that people have brought up is a sound one. IIRC the Christian Name thing is a leftover of Roman persecution (along with telling catecumens to leave after a certain point in the liturgy) , but I would have heard that off-hand at least a decade ago.
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2016 01:34 |
|
I'm disappointed in certain posters (you know who you are) for not repping the Orthodox Church's hat game better. It's... extremely powerful.
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2016 16:03 |
|
Even our laypeople have access to some of the mightiest hats (when they get married)
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2016 16:07 |
|
The Phlegmatist posted:Want to see my fursona? When u hit the jager too hard
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2017 21:28 |
|
HEY GAL posted:the mormons, however, have kept it real. Lol no they haven't. 61% went for trump vs. 25% for Clinton. The 3rd party candidates they went for were still republican (or near-republican) hangmen like Gary Johnson.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2017 01:18 |
|
The Serbian reply is apparently "indeed, He is born!" which I dont think anyone else does. Weirdos. Ваистину се роди my dad
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2017 13:55 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:You're dense I'm proud of you.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2017 02:18 |
|
Mo Tzu posted:history is bad, actually. like, overwhelmingly so History rules, especially the parts where heads are split open (cooler than decapitation imo, unless the decapitation is done by something weird like a suspension bridge cable)
|
# ¿ Jan 15, 2017 14:15 |
|
Patriarch Theodoros II of Alexandria and All Africa consecrates deaconesses ITS LIT and it was the Eastern Orthodox Theodoros not the Coptic one because there are two in Alexandria and it's confusing. Edit also I'm super late but it's fine to punch Nazis. Killing them is less fine, but St. Alexander Nevsky didn't greet the Livonian knights with bouquets of flowers. God understands if it is truly the only option your lovely mortal brain can accept in dire straits. It's not good though Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 01:03 on Feb 23, 2017 |
# ¿ Feb 23, 2017 00:52 |
|
Paladinus posted:What does 'Deaconess of the Missions' mean? I'm not exactly sure the full range of allowances it makes but at the very least they are able to help conduct marriages, adult baptisms, etc. at the monastery of Kolwezi in the DRC. Who knows what this will mean for future recognition of the order outside of Africa but this is the first step and hopefully not the last.
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2017 05:09 |
|
The Phlegmatist posted:But really it just boils down to the fact that the Protestants had lived under the awful loving Renaissance popes for a long time and just hated the papacy. That's probably best seen with their abortive attempt to enter into Eastern Orthodoxy. Which basically entails the Patriarch of Constantinople telling them "we don't like the Pope either but your theology is bad and you should feel bad, there are seven sacraments, please don't write us ever again." Keep in mind this is at the end of the third reply. In the first letter he explains the need to follow the holy synods. In the second letter he goes in excruciating and heavily cited detail into why the filioque is aberrant and then beseeches them again to leave behind their innovations. He also, more briefly, defends the veneration of saints and the Virgin Mary and other Traditions. All of this is within the context of the Lutherans asking to join the Orthodox, but as the letters continue it is clear that they do not want to join them but convert them. Maybe Jeremiah could have written a fourth letter but I don't think it would have done much good. Also worth mentioning that this takes place starting in 1576, 30 years after Luther died. Translations of Jeremiah's letters are available here: http://orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/jeremiah.aspx
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2017 16:03 |
|
Tias posted:Can someone itt explain the role of crows and ravens in christian mythology? They're smart birds, and cool. That's it.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2017 18:43 |
|
Tias posted:There is no inherent sexism in ancient american theology, though of course there is a lot of dumb men and traditions anyway. This is an extraordinarily bold claim given how little we know about the ancient Americas. Also, the Aztecs seem pretty run-of-the-mill sexist what with their focus on an all-male warrior caste and a male war and sun god. All of this ancient presentism, eg finding feminists in ancient times, is the sickly child of 18th century mythologizing on the "state of nature".
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2017 12:39 |
|
Tias posted:Which is why I said theology, not society or culture, but keep provoking yourself I guess. E: I'm not even claiming they were feminist, so chill the hell out - I'm just saying that parts of ancient society were a lot more woke about sex and gender than we are now. Saying there is "nothing inherently sexist" about their theology is still a hot garbage take. Not only are you lumping together a bunch of Amerindian civilizations but it is entirely unprovable about, say, the Crab Orchard Culture, and there are many others (like the Powhatan) whose religion we only know in fragments. There's also the issue of separating the theology and cultural practice, which I don't think is applicable past a certain limit. In the same way I'd say that the Orthodox Church is theologically sexist for keeping menstruating women from receiving Communion, despite this not being part of the central religious text. quote:I'm not including aztecs, because it's really hard to actually prove anything about their beliefs. maybe then dont make sweeping generalisations
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2017 18:46 |
|
Tias posted:Can you expound on this? It seems pretty arbitrary to condemn demons to hell without a substantial surrender to predetermination( which they may have been fans of, I know very little about either saint), if you could do something to help them. Being in hell is kinda quintessential to their being. Also, they're already there. But I'm not strong on demonology. It's all pretty complicated to be honest.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2017 12:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 00:10 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:If any man be devout and love God, let him enjoy this fair and radiant triumphal feast. If any man be a wise servant, let him rejoicing enter into the joy of his Lord. If any have labored long in fasting, let him now receive his recompense. If any have wrought from the first hour, let him today receive his just reward. If any have come at the third hour, let him with thankfulness keep the feast. If any have arrived at the sixth hour, let him have no misgivings; because he shall in nowise be deprived thereof. If any have delayed until the ninth hour, let him draw near, fearing nothing. If any have tarried even until the eleventh hour, let him, also, be not alarmed at his tardiness; for the Lord, who is jealous of his honor, will accept the last even as the first; he gives rest unto him who comes at the eleventh hour, even as unto him who has wrought from the first hour. Hell. Yes.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2017 00:45 |