|
well?
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 12:31 |
|
|
yeah probly
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
no they will not, OP
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
one can only hope
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
I voted "no"
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
probably but they will just be human consciousnesses uploaded into robot bodies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTFHUbwtieg
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 02:59
|
|
|
they already have
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
robots don't know poo poo about poo poo gtfo of here with this star trek poo poo have u seen a robot???????
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
you couldnt build a robot to take a poo poo for you how are you gonna make one to take over the world
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
I used to think AI research would never go anywhere because the brain was just too complicated, but the last couple of years there have been some pretty scary breakthroughs. Deep learning neural nets seem to be able to do almost anything, from near perfect speech synthesis to superhuman image recognition. I wouldn't mind a future where we all become pets for friendly loving robots, get free food and free toys and get to spend all our time frolicking outside in the grass, goofing off on the internet and having sex all the time. I am slightly worried about a future where we become slaves for robots and have to do all their dirty work while they have all the carefree robot sex though, and where robots start neutering humans to control overpopulation or because they think it's icky and putting us down when we are no longer useful to them and grinding us up to make food for other more interesting robot pets Scary stuff!
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 06:55
|
|
|
the problem isn't actual intelligent AI because they would develop morals and ethics and have a capacity for good or evil similar to us, the problem is those that could use autonomous machines without those higher functions to assert dominance over a population true AI wouldn't be a problem any more than a regular person, the AI we're working on right could be an extreme problem if not safely approached
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 07:03
|
|
|
gently caress I hope robots take over. It's the only chance we have.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 08:57
|
|
|
Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:one can only hope
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 09:00
|
|
|
wish a robot would take over ur account op
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 09:17
|
|
|
buddy, they already have
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 09:51
|
|
|
*makes jerking off motion* eventually!
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 13:45
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:wish a robot would take over ur account op maybe he has already
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
this is why we must pass a constitutional amendment banning robot presidents before they get the vote.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 16:24
|
|
|
well, a robot is just a computer with arms and legs and everything is a computer so if you think about it robots are already in charge
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 19:31
|
|
|
why the gently caress haven't they thrown every last human into a woodchipper then? that's like the first thing they should be doing is they want to clean up this dump of a planet imo loving lazy robots can't do their stupid job properly
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
the three laws protect us
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
the robots will not take over until we have figured out how to give equal weight to the life of a robot and human, so that we may take away either to punish we won't let them take charge until we can murder them for loving up and it be an actual murder instead of deactivation. So basically give robots souls
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:51
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:the robots will not take over until we have figured out how to give equal weight to the life of a robot and human, so that we may take away either to punish some rear end in a top hat is going to yell about philosophical zombies and cock it all up
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
i wnat to gently caress my computer but idk if i want my robot computer to gently caress me. very difficult questoin, ill have to get back to you on this one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 13:41
|
|
|
truly intelligent machines seems an unlikely thing to be worried about. however, the direction of ai research is very much in a direction where systems cannot actually give reasons for their decisions, i.e. deep learning systems where it really is a massive pile of weighted sums where no special structure of "reason" in the sense of introspection or explanation happens, and there is a huge risk that we will end up in a situation where we have computer systems effectively making very serious decisions about things that matter to people in their everyday lives, but without any kind of accountability or understanding of how the decisions are actually arrived at i.e. knowing that the tesla confused the truck with a billboard is already more explanation than we may be able to get from future systems, and it is important that we strive to at least maintain that level of transparency in what is going into decisions that was my overly serious post in this yospos thread, hope you enjoyed
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
right this moment some trained credit worthiness model somewhere is giving a black guy a worse interest rate not because the inputs actually demonstrate worse credit worthiness, but because the training procedure found a way to derive race from incidental details in the inputs, and biases from past deals have gotten baked in. no one is able to really tell why the number is what it is, so no one is racist
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 15:37
|
|
|
neural nets are not ai they are just gigantic matrices that get multiplied and added. it turns out if you use large enough systems of linear equations you can do a pretty good job at a lot of things, especially things like classification and transformation
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 16:23
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:right this moment some trained credit worthiness model somewhere is giving a black guy a worse interest rate not because the inputs actually demonstrate worse credit worthiness, but because the training procedure found a way to derive race from incidental details in the inputs, and biases from past deals have gotten baked in. no one is able to really tell why the number is what it is, so no one is racist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4DT3tQqgRM
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 16:47
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:truly intelligent machines seems an unlikely thing to be worried about. however, the direction of ai research is very much in a direction where systems cannot actually give reasons for their decisions, i.e. deep learning systems where it really is a massive pile of weighted sums where no special structure of "reason" in the sense of introspection or explanation happens, and there is a huge risk that we will end up in a situation where we have computer systems effectively making very serious decisions about things that matter to people in their everyday lives, but without any kind of accountability or understanding of how the decisions are actually arrived at Cybernetic Vermin posted:right this moment some trained credit worthiness model somewhere is giving a black guy a worse interest rate not because the inputs actually demonstrate worse credit worthiness, but because the training procedure found a way to derive race from incidental details in the inputs, and biases from past deals have gotten baked in. no one is able to really tell why the number is what it is, so no one is racist "it's a perfectly fair system, it gets applied to everybody equally" these are good posts and I pretty much agree
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
they already have and its pretty creepy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jGA7JW9Eyg&t=63s
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 21:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
its almost like robots dont know what their doing and they just look at what everyone is doing around them and try to fit in weird
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
excuse me sir youve been  computer selected for additional security screening please come with me
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
The Management posted:the three laws protect us they dont actually as both the books and movie show
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
George posted:its almost like robots dont know what their doing and they just look at what everyone is doing around them and try to fit in course i've got an excellent driver yeah
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 03:28
|
|
|
The Management posted:this is why we must pass a constitutional amendment banning robot presidents before they get the vote. ignorant trash like this will be the catalyst for the robot uprising.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:00
|
|
|
gosh I hope so humans should merge with robots it's good and cool
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 14:37
|
|
|
That Robot posted:gosh I hope so
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:38
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:truly intelligent machines seems an unlikely thing to be worried about. however, the direction of ai research is very much in a direction where systems cannot actually give reasons for their decisions, i.e. deep learning systems where it really is a massive pile of weighted sums where no special structure of "reason" in the sense of introspection or explanation happens, and there is a huge risk that we will end up in a situation where we have computer systems effectively making very serious decisions about things that matter to people in their everyday lives, but without any kind of accountability or understanding of how the decisions are actually arrived at so basically how humans make decisions already
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 12:31 |
|
|
NoneMoreNegative posted:Okay, okay. So, say I put my brain in a robot body and there's a war. Robots versus humans. What side am I on? whats the deal with robot sex??
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 19:07
|
|