|
Remember early on when the rewards for winning used to be really good.
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 19:06 |
|
|
Really want someone to snap and say what they actually think of this poo poo. Shame they'd never show it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
I hope the board room explodes. gently caress sralen and karen too. Knob heads
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
In early series the prizes were holidays and stuff. You know it's bad when the grotty caff of despair makes the prize look like poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
lol at Sugar saying someone taking an interest in one of their items and saying it was nice was maybe too good to be true. That's literally how it works, you show someone something and they like it so they buy it. Good grief
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:lol at Sugar saying someone taking an interest in one of their items and saying it was nice was maybe too good to be true. That's literally how it works, you show someone something and they like it so they buy it. Good grief Nah only sell to people who don't want your stuff. And before you start selling ask them if they have any money.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
Steve2911 posted:Nah only sell to people who don't want your stuff. And before you start selling ask them if they have any money.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
crispix posted:In early series the prizes were holidays and stuff. That caf has had a facelift, it looks flash compared to the old one Project Manager should get the boot here, it didn't look managed at all. Just a load of idiots doing whatever they wanted
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:48
|
|
|
Steve2911 posted:Nah only sell to people who don't want your stuff. And before you start selling ask them if they have any money. Nah working out if the person you're pitching to is allowed to buy them is a legit thing and the first thing almost any sales person will establish if it can't be assumed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:48
|
|
|
Fire them all.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
Pretty desperate stuff from Rebecca
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
Rebecca is about crying already Michelle to go, maybe Rebecca too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
StoneOfShame posted:Fire them all.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
This season is going to be hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
First week is it's usual cacophony of nonsense, but I think these people are all broken people. It'll be glorious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 22:01
|
|
|
I'm sure we always say this but this honestly looks like it might be the most useless bunch yet
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
I hope lord sugar makes them all do sex work.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
Remember that time when the girls flirted with the guys at the fish market to get a better price and suralan decided that was cheating and took away some of their money? Good times.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
HookShot posted:Remember that time when the girls flirted with the guys at the fish market to get a better price and suralan decided that was cheating and took away some of their money? lol if you've never been conned into buying something by a flirty lady
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:lol if you've never been conned into buying something by a flirty lady I am a lady and this has happened to me. I just thought it was hilarious that with all the intrinsic advantages men have over women in business that the one time women used the ONE thing they have that men don't (boobies) Sugar was like "NOPE THATS CHEATING". Because this show just wasn't sexist enough without the host getting in on that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
HookShot posted:I am a lady and this has happened to me. Yes because demonstrating the way women get ahead in business is to show cleavage is the progressive alternative vision the show was too sexist to explore. Please drop this stupid line of reasoning. e: no one said it was 'cheating' they were ruled against for behaviour not suitable for a business employee, something contestants of both genders have been smacked with before. Khablam fucked around with this message at 02:25 on Oct 7, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
Most useless bunch of muppets yet. Should be a good series.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 10:29
|
|
|
I worked with Karthik about 6 or 7 years ago, not that closely, but I can guarantee no one at any point called him Big K. Many other things, maybe, but never any variation of K. He was a mediocre computer server janitor, and joined us one time on a company-organised trip up Mt Snowdon. He kept badgering me to take photos of him in increasingly bizarre poses, a particular favourite being this number:  I hope he goes out soon. I can't watch much more of this nonsense.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 11:14
|
|
|
That guy needs to sort his eyebrows out. Did anyone ever make a 'Special K' joke?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 11:17
|
|
|
thestoreroom posted:I worked with Karthik about 6 or 7 years ago, not that closely, but I can guarantee no one at any point called him Big K. Many other things, maybe, but never any variation of K. HA, as I was watching him go on about that I couldn't help but think of Arnold 'Ace' Rimmer. Glad my hunch was correct.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 14:07
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:lol if you've never been conned into buying something by a flirty lady A couple of attractive flirty ladies tricked me into letting them into my flat and changing my electricity supplier once. When I realised what happened afterwards I called up to cancel. I assume they got the finder's fee anyway, so everyone wins (?). Also when I got broken into at the same flat the two policewomen that came around were also strangely flirty and attractive. Maybe I was being gang-stalked by pretty women??! Edit: also enjoying the show so far. Not hatewatching yet!
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
Finally. I'm just 10 minutes in, but we already have having watched a bit of Bargain Hunt as a qualification. Looks like the casting department's done a good job this year.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
(on selling a chair) "I've actually got a sofa myself..." Never change, Apprentice candidates.
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
I do sometimes wonder to what extent appearing on this television programme harms contestants' careers afterwards.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 13:45
|
|
|
The man who couldn't actually make the payment and them being shouted at for it was for sure the most annoying bit of the show. Why was he talking to them about buying it if he isn't allowed to actually do it? Totally stupid. The lady who keeps trying to be funny is quite annoying so far, I hope she's the "star" of one of the episodes so we can get to know her better. And there's at least three people in that OP who I don't remember seeing whatsoever.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2016 16:27
|
|
|
I don't remember anyone from last week. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 20:41
|
|
|
I do, there was a guy with a monobrow! And uh...
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
Tonight on The Apprentice: Advertising Jeans. Can't wait to see them hover over the shoulder of some poor designer.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 20:45
|
|
|
Okay so I'll cross "SEX SELLS!!!" on bingo card in advance.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
crispix posted:I don't remember anyone from last week. The one with the haircut that aged her by about 10 years but I think she got fired. Oh and Bernard St Hubbins or whatever his name was
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
How do you forget WHOOPS NEARLY DROPPED IT or are you blacking that part out?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
Last week was kind of boring, but the advertising tasks are almost always good, especially with top shelf morons like these
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
Nettle Soup posted:I do, there was a guy with a monobrow! And uh... Don't forget Tim Nice but Dim
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Yeah the ad challenge is always good for a giggle. Aren't they normally a bit later on in the series when theybare a bit more frazzled and prone to making terrible decisions?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 19:06 |
|
|
who loving compliments themselves in a mirror?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 21:05
|
|