USPOL Nov: The vindication of Prester Jane by the narcissist Donald Trump

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > USPOL Nov: The vindication of Prester Jane by the narcissist Donald Trump

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

BlueBlazer posted:

I think I saw here rumors of Joe as SoS.

Oh pleeeease

You did, but unfortunately he later said he wasn't interested. :sigh:

Edit for source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/28/politico-joe-biden-clinton-secretary-of-state/92882402/

# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 02:18

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 10, 2024 00:22

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

Mr Hootington posted:

https://twitter.com/rachaelmbade/status/793962977267425280
do it

I'll believe it when I see it. They claimed they were going to dump :boehner:

way back when and they've been calling Ryan a RINO basically since he became Speaker, but they never do anything about it.

EDIT:

BigRed0427 posted:

This would mean Pelosi would be Speaker, Right?

If they actually end up calling a vote it could happen, but even the Freedom Caucus knows that, which is why they never actually call a vote.

# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 01:31

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

Jonas Albrecht posted:

I've read the name Arzy a billion times in these threads, could I make a small request? Could someone quote a sample of his madness from 2012?

You can't really call it "madness" because Arzy in 2012 was pro-Romney and therefore smug as gently caress about how the Rs were gonna take everything you guys :smug:

It says something about how far up his own rear end he was that the biggest thing I remember about 2012 Arzy was a bunch of people posting giant sparklee banners on Election Night saying "HEY ARZY, WI WENT BLUE!!!!!"

# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 18:50

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

So I know most people here hate The Economist but they just endorsed HRC and holy loving poo poo at this :iceburn:

on Trump:

The Economist posted:

We would sooner have endorsed Richard Nixon�even had we known how he would later come to grief.

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21709540-why-we-would-cast-our-hypothetical-vote-hillary-clinton-americas-best-hope

# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 19:24

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

mcmagic posted:

Why aren't you as angry as I am that we're at the place we are now 5 days before the election where the most disgusting human being to ever run for president keeps gaining ground on a flawed democrat? This election should've been a laugher.

Because the primary is loving over and we don't get a do-over just because you don't like HRC.

# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 19:53

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

BlueberryCanary posted:

OK but what people really want to know is who would win in an election against Trump: Batman or Superman?

Batman obviously. Who would vote for a nerdy fucker like Clark Kent?

# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 19:59

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

iospace posted:

https://twitter.com/dorseyshaw/status/794252900209983490

I see it's time for Weedlord Bonerhitler to make a comeback :q:

# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 20:05

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

Tiny Brontosaurus posted:

The poor consultant tried to argue for a shorter hashtag because of character limits, but that was shot down

"Our characters have no limits! That's the point!"

*conference room thunders with applause*

I was going to ask if the movie was actually Limitless but apparently that came out in 2011.

# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 21:18

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

Spoondick posted:

The drug companies jack up the prices and reduce availability of drugs (to jack up the price of drugs) to patients already. As someone who's been in the pharmacy biz for 10 years now: gently caress drug companies. As a Californian I've learned that propositions are full of weasel-wording and can't be fully trusted. Instead, look who's putting money up for or against a prop. No on 61 is funded by Pfizer and Eli Lilly. This tells me everything I needed to know.

I'm all for loving over drug companies but prop 61 isn't really that simple. The prop doesn't require the drug companies to sell their drugs at the same price as the VA, it requires the state agencies to buy them at that price. Which leads to a simple question that the prop doesn't answer: what happens if MediCal says "we're required to buy medicine X at Y price" and the drug companies say "gently caress you, that's too low for us to make a profit, we're not selling"?

It's a pretty major case of the prop-writers' hearts being in the right place but the prop's wording having a whole bunch of unintended and really bad consequences.

# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 00:36

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

Zerilan posted:

Not to be all unskewed polls here, but the demographics in these are pretty bad. Remington has the 30 and under age bracket voting at less than half the turnout of 2012. CNN/ORC literally includes no one under age 35.

I hate being that guy but the CNN poll (and others from them) did not include literally zero people under 35. There were not enough people in that group to make a statistically significant prediction because the MoE was too high, but that is not the same as literally zero people.

# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 05:44

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

sincx posted:

Is Pennsylvania at +4 Hillary a cause for concern? Shouldn't she be leading there by a lot more?

There's a reason that PA is the state where every election the GOP thinks "all right, this is the year we're gonna take it!" They've been saying this for decades and haven't taken it yet.

# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 18:39

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

Apraxin posted:

He's peddling an insane fairy tale where each issue can be easily fixed with a single, simple idea, and then instantly (white) America will be returned to its glory days. And a lot of people are just eating it up.

Businessman finds One Weird Trick to save your job. Globalists HATE him!

# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 18:41

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

So did anything come out of that "FBI FINDS NEW EMAILS RELATED TO HILLARY'S TENURE AS SECSTATE" thing from yesterday? CBS News (and only CBS) had a huge front page story about it but then it just kind of disappeared.

# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 21:41

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

zxqv8 posted:

Why is it people keep claiming that Hillary wants to abolish the second amendment?

She's a Democrat.

# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 22:57

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

isk posted:

Probated

He's actually off probation tomorrow!

http://forums.somethingawful.com/banlist.php?userid=130818

# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 23:24

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

ReV VAdAUL posted:

Why is CO such a lock? reports say Dems and GOP are in a dead heat: http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/early-voting-lead-for-colorado-democrats-dwindles-as-republican-voting-surges

I don't know if I'd call it a lock, but polling of early voters has shown a pretty substantial Clinton lead there, and as the article says, more than half of CO votes are already in. If the polling is correct, Trump would need a pretty hefty advantage in the set of people who haven't voted yet in order to win.

# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 01:13

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 10, 2024 00:22

TheOneAndOnlyT: Dec 18, 2005; Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

weekly font posted:

iirc, Repubs were up in EV in 2012 and lost bigly. They are currently down.

In fairness it should be noted that CO went to all-mail voting this year, which they didn't have in 2012, so that kind of comparison doesn't really hold.

# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 01:15

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > USPOL Nov: The vindication of Prester Jane by the narcissist Donald Trump