|
Schizotek posted:Berniebros tank election, smugly gloat about how its everybody but their fault. Glad ya'll could crucify my future as part of your tantrum. Sorry man, but https://twitter.com/CarlBeijer/status/796222773970567171 This kind of narrative needs to change, because while white people caused a lot of trouble, they were not the Democrats only problem.
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 07:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 11:39 |
|
|
Good Lord (har har) https://twitter.com/tperkins/status/796221899269349376
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 08:06
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:China is actually turbofucked if he does this because China's entire economy is based on selling things to the US and it's already hanging by a thread. you can also replace china with canada and have this post be equally true
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
in retrospect building your candidacy in no small part thanks to the support of african-americans in southern red states is good for inclusive politics but bad when it comes to the electoral college
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 15:48
|
|
|
Deified Data posted:[*]It's useless playing "what if?" at this juncture but Bernie probably would have squeaked by. Building coalitions of voters in important for Democrats and Clinton didn't turn out the parts of that coalition she promised to. Bernie would have suffered with minorities but they have skin in the game and would have came out anyway. The people who needed to be motivated and persuaded, youth and independents, would have been a lock. More importantly, Bernard would have challenged the areas where Trump was really strong - the rust belt, poorer rural areas - which matters when it comes to the electoral college.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 15:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 11:39 |
|
|
I can see Trump being an incredibly lazy and pretty corrupt president who doesn't do much. unfortunately the republicans also control everything else.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 15:59
|
|