|
hmm if donald trump can be president, what about 
|
#
¿
Nov 10, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 00:51 |
|
|
devtesla posted:I'm all in for Keith Ellison and what convinced me was this perfect tweet. that guy is high up at the NYT?  they're all just completely clueless aren't they? they're loving incompetents masquerading as technocrats
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2016 12:35
|
|
|
Hillary 2020 posted:We need the old Daily Show now more than ever. oh no! another CTR shill!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2016 04:02
|
|
|
huge pile of hamburger posted:America would be a better place if the Clintons just hosed off and never showed their faces again hillary's in the woods of new york right now. maybe when she comes out she'll be able to use sith electricity
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2016 05:26
|
|
|
in the worst case we can run a left-wing entertainer. maybe will ferrell/lena dunham 2020?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2016 21:21
|
|
|
Paul Zuvella posted:Bernie Sanders is literally going to be 79 during the next election and there is literally no way that he will be 83 at the end of that first term. if bernie has to run in 2020 we are in huge trouble. hopefully by that point though he will have groomed a protege for the position
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
Thump! posted:Why did everyone forget about Tim Kaine? the only people who cared about tim kaine were delusional hillary boosters who were trying to turn him into diamond joe 2.0
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2016 02:56
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:blaming political correctness or identity politics is wrong. the issue is not that the democrats focused on them, its that they didnt focus on economics at all. and the reason they are pretending that social justice and economic justice are incompatible is because it gives them a convenient excuse for not being economically left at all
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2016 09:49
|
|
|
social justice (the basics like "maybe black people can be programmers too", not stuff like "maybe we should not let police murder black people at will") is in with corporate america, but economic justice isn't, which is why hillary's campaign which catered to corporate america ignored economic justice like the plague
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2016 09:51
|
|
|
zegermans posted:At least n the current cycle, they had a plan - a very good, progressive plan - but refused to even try to advertise it. All of Clinton's ads were pointing out how lovely Trump is. Everyone knows Trump is a lovely person. Few people knew how that would negatively affect them personally, and they didn't even try to explain that. eh, i don't think hillary's economic plan was that good, but if she had actually advertised it she almost definitely would've won. her campaign was a comedy of errors that managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
punk rebel ecks posted:Lol at people who actually believe the Democrats gave a poo poo about LBGT rights. They only switched the second it was inconvenient to them to not to hold that stance. Once national polls hit 51% for gay marriage, every Democrat just happened to become "enlightened" or at best "evolved". i was genuinely surprised when this was a controversial opinion during the election
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2016 00:11
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:I think you'll find that eugenics is bad and progressivism is good, therefore it is impossible for eugenics to ever come from progressivism since something bad can never come from good . 1. The founder of planned parenthood was into eugenics. Does that make planned parenthood good or bad?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2016 12:45
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Alright, let's see if you can come up with one non-tortured interpretation of what he said that isn't exactly what I'm asking him to justify. no, what he said is that centrist democrats are incapable of doing anything good, not that leftists are incapable of evil. maybe you should attack him on the obvious hyperbole (for example, by providing examples of centrist dems doing good things, they exist!) instead of things he didn't actually say?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2016 14:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 00:51 |
|
|
zegermans posted:hrm interesting. Do you think they went after Ghaddafi because he was trying to form a non-Rothschild controlled gold-backed currency to trade oil? do you actually think the US stepped in to this level because they give a poo poo about the population of syria? we're talking about a country that constantly ignores israel genociding a captive population for god's sake
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2017 16:14
|
|