Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Nuclearmonkee
Jun 10, 2009


slave to my cravings posted:

Socialism wasn't going to sell but any sort of populist anti-establishment message would have been a lot better than none.

People vote for "gently caress the rich elite assholes who are loving us!" without reading too deep in the how. Ergo Trump.

Socialism would sell just fine if wrapped appropriately.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nuclearmonkee
Jun 10, 2009


Cubey posted:

i do not think the number of berniebros who went to trump or even third part was significant enough to swing the election either way. bernie supporters overwhelmingly supported clinton when he conceded, don't let idiots on facebook and twitter lead you to believe otherwise.

The ones who turned out at least. The young voter turnout was piss poor.

Nuclearmonkee
Jun 10, 2009


rum sodomy Rainbow Dash posted:

One thing that can't be ignored is that eight years of obstinate refusal to work with Obama and Democrats in Congress seems to have paid off.

Not to say that it's just the Republicans at fault here, not by a long shot, but this is the opposition they're dealing with and Democrats need to learn how to deal with that. Because the Republicans we have now are never going to give Democrats anything in return for playing nice and making a bunch of concessions.

He never once used the bully pulpit. Applying pressure/bribes in a backroom deal does not make an opponent give an inch or a single gently caress in our political climate. Tanking the poll numbers of moderates in their home districts by holding them to the fire until they squeal via the bully pulpit probably would.

I could see Trump using it to get some harebrained schemes through. If he does maybe the dems can learn a thing or two on exploiting the media's lust for shiny objects and ratings.

Nuclearmonkee
Jun 10, 2009


Peel posted:

I don't think it was a mistake to trust the consensus of polling and try for important bonuses like propositions. We know the polling was systematically wrong now, but going with your gut feeling over what reputable polls tell you will burn you more often than not. Bill Mitchell was lucky, not insightful.

The problem was aiming for electoral votes in landslide states at the cost of maintaining your firewall in case of a polling error, because bonus electoral votes don't actually get you anything.

Polling wasn't that off. LV models were extremely off.

Nuclearmonkee
Jun 10, 2009


Dems have 4 years to get their poo poo together. By then we should have had be in our next scheduled recession with an immensely unpopular Republican government.

If they nominate another corporate stooge it's torches and pitchforks time.

  • Locked thread