|
well, first thing's first, we've got to get some loving access auditing going on. we need to be able to see what changes are made, when, and by whom. second, i- oh gently caress, i've just been murdered by a secret cylon
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2016 08:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 17:57 |
|
|
also, can we replace the loving connection machines already? i know the guy who originally networked five of them together is long gone, and yeah sure the blinkenlightzen are nifty, but the outdated processing power is really hampering our ability to expand the park
Farmer Crack-Ass fucked around with this message at 08:33 on Nov 28, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2016 08:29
|
|
|
"freeze all motor functions" "ah ah ahhh, you didn't say the magic word!" "please! god drat it, i hate this megalomaniac crap!" Farmer Crack-Ass fucked around with this message at 08:55 on Nov 28, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2016 08:52
|
|
|
The Management posted:first thing we have to do is get a service processor module installed in the hosts with an OOB management login so we can log in remotely even when they decide to ignore our commands. tbf i think the no-signal thing is less "bad coverage" and more active jamming
|
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2016 21:26
|
|
|
forward that poo poo to HR, not our problem
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 09:12
|
|
|
Munkeymon posted:they just keep saying "this doesn't look like anything to me" loving layabouts need to start taking the chance of an audit seriously smh seriously lmbo here
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
FW: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: All: New PTO Schedule okay, i know we've been swamped with trying to patch the random features the old man keeps committing, but we've really got to make some progress on updating the redaction software. i know that cognitive dissonance is a really powerful tool, but we'd be better off if we could instead stick a pre-processor between the optics and the brain that not only strips out 'offending' material, but maybe even replaces it with something that doesn't threaten to flip out a host. best thing is, if we can get the optical preprocessor approved and functional, we can use *that* to log and signal when they're being hit with 'bad' inputs so we don't have to rely on a verbal cue. narrative has been asking about putting in a host with no tongue and it always gets denied because so many of our diagnostics require hosts to be able to speak. (also lol) MALE SHOEGAZE posted:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: All: New PTO Schedule
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
Uncle Enzo posted:Hi Bill, so I'm trying to work on the new horse behavior we talked about and I'm kinda confused- do the horses and dogs have an analysis mode? Do they have a synthetic voice to answer my questions? Do they get the flashbacks to the times they were ritualistically murdered? no. the dogs and horses don't get the upper cognition packages, so even if they had the voice hardware, they wouldn't be able to verbally interact. animal behavior doesn't have to be as finely nuanced - most of the guests have never even seen a horse - so we can just restrict their behaviors to preprogrammed responses and routines, and the tablets are entirely adequate for that. christ, if we let horses throw the guests, that'd be the biggest potential cause of death in the entire park.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:Ticket #DL00189282 send a couple of black hat hosts over to the cabin as "horse rustlers" when the guest is out looking for another horse. no big deal
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:i liked elsie. she'd better be back next season mega-agreed
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2016 06:16
|
|
|
i noticed they left several peoples' fate uncertain. we never heard a neck snapping, we never saw her corpse, and bernard specifically asks "what did you make me do to her?" not "why did you make me kill her" or something like that. stubbs got tackled and then not seen again. hale is not seen being shot. sylvester the neckbeardy butcher is told to stay. i can't decide how much of it is "we can't decide what we want to do with these people yet" and how much of it is "who exactly will be willing to come back for a second season?" the reason i say that is it's always amusing to me when i see some old grognerd talk about how Blake's 7 was so daring for killing off the entire cast at the end of the series, when in fact the producers had already decided that in the event of getting picked up for a fifth year, anyone who wanted to come back would just handwave it away as only a flesh wound.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2016 06:33
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:alright who's the joker who built not one, but FIVE mrs doubtfire hosts. i'm still trying to figure out who tasked ConDiv with building an entire replica of Saigon so that they could do Good Morning Vietnam
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 17:57 |
|
|
lol that SECURITY LOCKDOWN window was totally shades of "an error has occurred, please contact your system administrator" ("motherfucker, i am the system administrator!!") "but... but we're supposed to be the authorized personnel...  "
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2016 08:33
|
|