|
Vindicator posted:It's like watching a thousand simultaneous games of telephone play out. It's gossip masquerading as a 24 hour news cycle. At the end there, she even knew that she didn't want to outright agree with the idea that California condones voter fraud even though seconds beforehand she had literally said California allows it, because that's loving insane, and so you just watch the argument adapt in real-time. Yeah, that's what I picked up too. Also, notice how when she's first asked that question, she tries to claim that she heard it on CNN. Why would someone who, in all likelihood believes that CNN is the Clinton News Network, want to defend their BS by pointing to that very same network? Because at some level, even she realizes that she can't bring up Fox News or Breitbart or FreedomPatriots.org. She wants her garbage to have some actual legitimacy.
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 08:07
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 09:50 |
|
|
Zipperelli. posted:In case people missed it, let me sum up the interview: She also kept trying to argue that she wasn't part of the "mainstream media", but rather was just mainstream in terms of number of views or some poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 15:40
|
|
to be able to finish it, because I can only take so much of that vapid oval office. The rest of it was, unfortunately, uneventful. I was kinda disappointed that Trevor didn't just crush her and really drive the point home to her that she's nothing but a mouthpiece and a honeypot for the conservative base who need an objectively attractive, blond haired, blue eyed woman to tell them what to think. She's lost without cue cards, has absolutely no worldly experience (she's like, 23 or 24) that would justify her lovely opinions, and in general is just dumb as a loving brick. Her only hope is she somehow pulls her head out of her rear end and see's that she's just a pawn and cuts ties... Yeah, like that'll happen 