Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
bag em and tag em
Nov 4, 2008

Pollyanna posted:

Why? What could possibly be their reasoning?

It's deeply ingrained in our ideas of fairness. It's incredibly easy to convince those who still have work that the safety nets for those unemployable are literal theft. The poorer the work force the easier it is to convince them that what little they have is being taken by the lazy shiftless Other who lives a life of glut on the backs of those who work.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

bag em and tag em
Nov 4, 2008
"That literally can't happen because how will the rich stay rich without people to buy things," doesn't take into account how society has worked like that for plenty of periods of our history. The gilded age, slave economies, hell feudalism, all worked out just great for the powerful rich while the teeming masses all got to die in the streets or under labor conditions that equated to manslaughter.

bag em and tag em
Nov 4, 2008

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

I agree very strongly that the poor and middle class are in economic trouble. Stuff is getting worse and will get worse and economic inequality is a major issue right now.

I just don't buy the "robots takin our jerbs" idea. It's a sci-fi story that doesn't add up. It's a fantasy. But a weird one where everyone is displaced by automation enough to reshape society but the products of this automation apparently vanishes into the sea or something and doesn't also affect society. Like people can imagine the part a heart surgeon loses his job because a robot does it cheaper and better, but somehow that sci-fi story never also has the part where everyone now can get cheap heart surgery. And like the knee jerk is the rich will keep the money for themselves, but the whole premise was about how amazingly cheap this machine would have to be to displace the dude. So why can only the rich afford to have or run them? Why can't the community hospital buy one?

We already have medicines that are pennies per pill to produce but hundreds of dollars to purchase. There might be decent examples of what you're saying but artificially expensive health care is a real thing and pharmaceutical companies and health care companies response is always "sorry lol we have no choice it's totally required, die if you don't like it."

bag em and tag em
Nov 4, 2008
Solved by electric shock collars? Okay. Cool. Sounds good man.

bag em and tag em
Nov 4, 2008
Hold up though are we going to get a sweet neo- grapes of wrath only this time about burger flippers being forced off their flat tops by the banks newfangled machines? I kinda want to read some really deep metaphors bout how a man can't know the beef lest he work it with his hands.

  • Locked thread