|
Nobody asked for a less visually impressive Interstellar, Villeneuve. Better cast, though.
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 13:10 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:it didn't make any sense in the context of the movie where the premise is what regular ol' humans would do in the situation. irl the soldiers there would be boring but competent same as everyone else in the movie and their primary job would be keeping actual crazies away. Yeah, Contact handled a bombing on the alien machine better by having it be a a plausible psycho like religious nut Jake Busey. Hard to think anything this movie does that hasn't been done better.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 01:50
|
|
|
Jenner posted:If so, why doesn't Amy Adams just make some different decisions and keep looking forward until she gets the Golden Ending? Because the movie is about a woman coming to accept the loss of a child. It's not, say, Next, which is literally about a dude who sees the future. Prophecy is just an analogy in this movie.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
BeanpolePeckerwood posted:The book makes it easier to understand. The book and the movie are different stories. That the movie includes something the book doesn't - Louise explicitly acting on knowledge of the future in the present to guide her behavior - makes it clear that vision of the future works differently between the two. BeanpolePeckerwood posted:That's not the point of the movie or the book. It's the point of both, despite the differences. sector_corrector posted:jump in a woodshredder, dipshit Sorry the truth hurts 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
BeanpolePeckerwood posted:I'd say you have a pretty narrow understanding natch Less a fatal diagnosis than the death arising from it, I suppose. Fair point. Sir Kodiak fucked around with this message at 03:46 on Dec 3, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2016 03:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 13:10 |
|
|
RainTree posted:You're dumb as gently caress. Perhaps, but still right about the movie  (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2016 13:37
|
|