Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
LGD
Sep 25, 2004

BeanpolePeckerwood posted:

:)

Well, the cyclical time (fate) idea isn't as much that she saw the different outcomes and made the choice anyways but rather she has always/will always make the same choice (now just with added understanding).

I mean I thought that was how it worked in the book, and that asking a heptapod why they didn't change the future would be like them asking one of us why don't we change what we did three weeks ago- i.e. a total non sequitur because that's not how things work. And the emotional core of the movie with her daughter absolutely worked with that in mind.

But I don't think that really caries over to rest of the film, because the entire plot hinges on Louise acting in the present based on extremely detailed information that she would likely only ever be in a position to acquire in the future if she took extremely specific actions predicated on having that information now. Calling General Chang is not a choice she would always make, because she would not have the information to make the same choice. In other words it's a closed causal loop where extremely valuable information arises from nothing, which means that either things are actually preordained, or that something like alternate timelines exists and it's possible to act upon causality to do things like create loops.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread