|
Sarsapariller posted:If you want to maximize your in-game profits you auto-load because filling up 600+ crates by hand will eat more time than 60 regular cargo runs. I think deep down Citizens know this, they're just so enamored of the shiny tech toy that they have to find some way to cram it into the dream. What they want, in reality is the same as every other sandbox mmo enthusiasts is for other players to be forced to be a box loader for them. They want to know the immersion exists, but it won't be THEM getting paid basically nothing to load cargo. Nearly every other sandbox MMO is populated with these idiots who wonder why no one wants to be a horse holder in real time.
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 10:14 |
|
|
Scruffpuff posted:They're grasping at the most tenuous straws now. I think Kojima, whether you like his stuff or not, has an established history of delivery. If it takes him 6 years, you know for the entire time that he's making progress, has a plan, knows how to do it, and will get it done. This also just basically ignores that Kojima has produced, directed, and/or written a game that has released every year for the past goddamn 20 years.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2017 00:57
|
|
|
Also it's illegal and punishable to file meritless law suits in the state of California. I'm sure Skadden knows this, and I seriously doubt they would've filed if they didn't think they could win. Of course "use CryEngine" is vague and who knows what the agreement says or escape hatches it has, but I'm unwilling to just dismiss this out of hand. Also an injunction is an interesting question. On the one hand they are currently distributing the supposedly breaching work. On the other hand the induction would severely limit CIG's ability to pay a potential suit and damage it's IP greatly, which neither side really wants (probably, since presumably Cry wants paid)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2017 23:41
|
|
|
Just to be clear, it is super common to get the source code for a big-boy graphics / game engine. That doesn't mean you can just do whatever you want with it.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
I can see it now: "Mr. Amazon, please help us save our game and PC gaming. We're using your platform and everything. We'll give you lots of positive press and feature you in game and ever. Now, I know that we're in trouble cause we promised that to the last suc- I mean business partner and we went back on it, but we're good for it this time I swear" EDIT: Just for shits, games with more viewers than SC right now: Doki Doki Literature Club (a free horror Visual Novel); Okami; Kerbal; Dofus.... SoftNum fucked around with this message at 02:30 on Dec 14, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:FYI, today was just the tip of the iceberg. Why are you captain underpants
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2017 02:31
|
|
|
Crazypoops posted:Until the end of time. which one?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2017 02:43
|
|
|
have these people actually read the complaint? Maybe they don't actually read or do anything except post on reddit. maybe that's why the game is good. none of them have played it so to them its as good as they are told.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
XK posted:Just lol that mspaint scribble is now highly likely to be a critical piece of evidence in a lawsuit. what thats not how code works thats not how anything works what
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2017 03:33
|
|
|
Eldragon posted:Depends on the company. I've worked under three different software firms that have a "anything you code in your spare time, we own it too" clause as part of the employment contract. I know this is getting into derail territory; but I was under the impression that much like tech non-competes, these sorts of clauses ended up being basically unenforceable. Also they can have the sorts of poo poo I code in my spare time.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
shitizen posted:The dumb thing is that the $35 isn't a lot of money for me. Yesterday I spent $28 on lunch, so you'd THINK I wouldn't care... but I do, for some reason. Just to be clear, this guy is not a poor. please don't kick him out for being a poor.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2017 16:06
|
|
|
SpaceCurtisLeMay posted:That’s not how Contract law works. If CiG never amended their 2013 contract to the new terms then CIG is still bound by the old licensing agreement. Not to mention that the CryENGINE standard agreement says you can't remove the logos (and that theirs has to be at least as large as yours). So they still boned.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
Amazon lists Star Citizen as "built with Lumberyard" on their Lumberyard page still.
SoftNum fucked around with this message at 18:16 on Dec 16, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Chalks posted:Wow. Games have had this technology for decades but CIG claimed it was brand new - and now we know why. They have no idea what they're doing so they've re-engineered the whole concept from scratch and done it in a really stupid way. What is supposed to be new about this clip? Engines have been doing everything I see there for at least 5 years, even the fiddly bits. idgi? EDIT: Hell, the lighting looks faked, and the texture normal map is obviously hosed up (that's the two pieces on the side that look mis-colored under the flashlight.) It looks like there's texture missing behind the shadow behind the desk (the checkerboard). Also it looks like it's billboarded cause it follows the camera. SoftNum fucked around with this message at 20:59 on Dec 16, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
Nyast posted:Where's this "Crytek is broke" storyline coming from anyways ? Honnest question. Because if you admit any fault or failing you are a failure and might as well not exist. Unlike their hero Chris and Star Citizen, which never has faults and is always getting bigger and moving forward; and has never made a mistake.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:LMAO!! I drat near spit my coffee. As proof that CryTek violated their contract, he posts...and opinion video that doesn't have any facts of that? Not to mention this is classic reddit arguing of "if you can't spend several hours watching lovely videos that may or may not prove my point then get out."
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Crytek has employed a legendary Wall Street law firm to pursue damages against the developers of perpetually-delayed space-sim Star Citizen. I assume brietbart would be anti this lawsuit since you know it's holding a business responsible for anything ever.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
PederP posted:In what bizarro reality does PC gaming need saving? Where does this strange hatred of consoles come from? I much prefer PC gaming, but I've owned a few consoles as well, and I can't really see the conflict. There was a brief period where PC games, especially in the US, were close to disappearing from stores and malls. But that's like 10-20 years ago now, and was a short interlude. PC gaming need to be saved from the PC police and the modern world, and go back to a time when everyone who gamed was just like CIG fans. I think this is actually what they believe. (ignore that PC gaming was never really just for pasty white boys)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
Clearly you "launder money" by hiring an expensive law firm to sue someone you are under contract with. Do they even know what money laundering is? EDIT: vvv Thanks! SoftNum fucked around with this message at 14:58 on Dec 20, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Codezombie posted:I was around in the 80's, the 80's sucked. I'm glad it's gone. Like most things I think the answer boils down to "because some dumb TV show said so."
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 17:41
|
|
|
What does "warbond" mean and why does it save $10?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Soooooo CIG is saving PC gaming by creating (yet another) first person shooter with a single player focus? EDIT: Why aren't the more sane citizens angry about CIG wasting their money on big name actors for a single player FPS? SoftNum fucked around with this message at 20:44 on Dec 20, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:So why are they all the sudden really pushing the part of the game that no citizen really wants? Because it's loving dead easy to make a single player FPS.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
Given previous experience with poo poo like this, almost assuredly someone (Crobberts?) probably said "fix these two minor things for the stream tomorrow" yesterday, and the devs with basically no sleep, etc. broke like _everything_ instead and there was no time to roll back before the live stream started.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
so it IS prerecorded bullshit? and they're going to stream it on twitch to make it seem like it's live? laffo
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 02:16
|
|
|
I love the tone too like "no you COMPLETE IDIOTS when we paid for a spot on IGN and said there was a livestream, it didn't mean live stream, it meant a playedback video where we are going to *chat* live at you. If you didn't know that you were stupid."
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 02:28
|
|
|
Latin Pheonix posted:One of my first thoughts was that this might be a carrot to attract/retain talent given their abysmal recruiting record, but as you say, why dilute the ordinary shares instead of just creating a new class? Maybe they couldn't be bothered to amend their company articles to create a new class of share? They're based on model articles after all... I've known small (read 5 employee) business owners to illegally classify their employees as (voting?) share holders in order to not be required pay them overtime. It would take balls to do it at this scale tho.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 16:31
|
|
|
Can someone explain where the "derek smart totally doxxed people" rallying cry comes from?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 17:12
|
|
|
kw0134 posted:So in the far future we've lost the tech for HUDs? Why is everything on LCDs? Cars nowadays have that tech, holy poo poo I'm getting an aneurysm from how infidelitious this fidelity is. My question is more "is any of the information on those HUDs affectable in game, and how much of it is actually important to spaceflight?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
you can see the input lad ont eh menus too.. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 21:44
|
|
|
also the stutter ad the model switches animations is super awesome.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 21:45
|
|
|
is that mark hammil?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
haven't we seen all this before?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 21:58
|
|
|
they really need to lerp their animation switching jfc.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
the shifting dof is slightly nauseating Edit: I only started drinking. am I doing it wrong?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
HOT TOILET ACTION
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:it felt like a 3 hour tour 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
My favorite part of the stream was where none of the animations were lerped. lerping between animations is like rule -2 of working with 3d animation scripts. (lerping is linear interpolation, where you make sure the model doesn't jitter between animation scripts. It's _built in_ to most engines. )
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 00:44
|
|
|
it looks like a game in 1 year of dev. Not 5.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 10:14 |
|
|
XK posted:It looked pretty ok. I can't particularly criticize the graphical elements, outside of the bugs and inconsistent framerate There was nothing noteworthy about it either. It was just, average? the real problem is that this looks like something that's been worked on for a year,m not 5 years with 400 programmers.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 04:05
|
|
