Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Barrel Cactaur
Oct 6, 2021

MegaZeroX posted:

The two studies I'm aware of that tackle the income of shoplifters are this and this . The former is from over 40,000 face to face interviews conducted from 2001-2002, and a summary of the data:

  • Those with family incomes over $122k adjusted to 2023 dollars were slightly more likely to steal than the 61k to 122k range, followed slightly by the 35k to 61k range, and the group making below 35k being the least likely. Its worth noting that the gap between all of these groups isn't that big though, and the biggest gap of these is the over $122k range to the $61k-$122k range
  • Men were much more likely to shoplift than women
  • Those with college degrees were the most likely to shop lift, followed by those with a high school degree, with those without a high school degree being the least likely
  • White people and Native Americans were the most likely to steal, with all other ethnicities being much less likely to
  • US-born citizens were far far more likely to steal than those born in another country
  • Those living in cities were more likely to shop lift, but like income, the gap isn't that big
  • Shoplifting was dramatically higher on the west coast than any other region of the US
  • Those with public insurance were dramatically less likely to steal than those with private or no insurance (presumably this is just combining the elderly being less likely to steal with

That being said, all of these factors pale in predictive power to measures of impulsiveness and antisocial behavior. The strongest predictive things were other kinds of theft, making money illegally, scamming people for money, pyromania, and destroying property.

The latter study I linked is much more narrow in scope. First, it only looked at those arrested for shoplifting, vs general shopper surveys. Second, the data is all the way from 1981-82, so its not clear how well things hold up. Third, all of the arrest data is only from a single city in the North West, which only had 34 arrests in the time examined. Nevertheless, keeping these limitations in mind, about 51% had family incomes over $51k in 2023 dollars, with about 57% of that 51% had family incomes over $119k.

So, in totality, at least a large percentage, probably a majority, of those shoplifting aren't low-income. And even for those that are low-income, they aren't necessarily stealing out of necessity. I grew up very poor and lived in homeless shelters, and "having any food" was never really a concern. Being unable to purchase video games, having no internet, living in a homeless shelter, sure, these were common. But having food and clothes was always a given. I'm sure there are places in the US where this isn't true, but those that are both poor and shoplifting aren't not necessarily stealing out of necessity.

If you want to understand this, it's the stratified justice system. If your position is precarious for some reason(probation, can't afford an arrest, etc) you avoid the risk that comes with getting caught. The more socially advantaged you are the less likely you are to have a prior or probation that could worsen punishment, the more you are capable of legal MAD that makes pursuing a minor theft not worth it from the stores perspective, the less likely you are to trigger the prole detector working the receipt checks, etc.

The meat prestige price point is telling about how broken retail is from supply and demand. Pricing items to move stock isn't as important as matching a magic spreadsheet in corporate. Which is based on a very out of touch rich person costs more = feels more valuable bit of psychology.

Barrel Cactaur fucked around with this message at 15:37 on Oct 23, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Barrel Cactaur
Oct 6, 2021

It is absolutely anti competitive to automatically coordinate pricing(though it's rare for it to get called out in the US before the monopolist has driven the tiny player out of business). The law predates computers. Amazon is doing it to always top the search results no matter sort criteria, knowing users will click them more than the competitor at similar prices. Pricing has no relation to the product underneath only on competition. Basically it turns capital advantage into consumer preference, buying out the market by temporarily subsidizing the consumer coming to Amazon.

Once it kills the competition the price automatically adjusts up to Amazons desired price. You also never get a deal, they only match.

Basically, it's a part of a strategy that relies on already having huge market share and cash on hand, it's a method for manipulation of the market.

Turning online shopping into a walled garden subscription system is the goal, where they can extract a huge rent on being the garden instead of any innovation. There is no free lunch, prime is funded by general price increases. 15 dollars a month simply can't cover the services. To enable those price increases Amazon must manipulate the market.

Barrel Cactaur fucked around with this message at 21:30 on Nov 16, 2023

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply