Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
SgtScruffy
Dec 27, 2003

Babies.


http://www.pressherald.com/2017/01/03/gov-lepage-says-hes-signed-off-on-legal-marijuana/

LePage has signed it, though it looks like he's asking for a suspension of the ability to legally sell until they can figure out infrastructure

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SgtScruffy
Dec 27, 2003

Babies.


Mods please change thread name to mbanje megathread

SgtScruffy
Dec 27, 2003

Babies.


TapTheForwardAssist posted:

While several initiatives in 2018 look pretty likely, here's one loooong shot: North Dakota is trying to get full-legal on the 2018 ballot: https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/north-dakota-cannabis-legalization-petition-okd-for-circulation

On the face of it, it seems pretty impractical since it was only two years ago they legalized MMJ, and that hasn't even begun to fire up yet. That said, Massachusetts only legalized MMJ in 2013 and went full Recreational in 2016, so it's not unprecedented. And I grant that doing it so close to the prior initiative has a few advantages, including a lot of institutional memory, maybe a lot of the same people re-volunteering, able to use the same locations/methods to get signatures, etc. And theoretically you might get some advantage from the outraged anti-weed people being burned out from losing in 2016, and indifferent to further increases.

Taking all that into account though, just over three years ago a poll in ND showed 47-41 in favor of Medical, but only 24-68 in favor of recreational. Though I'm sure those numbers have improved given the national trend, that's still a significant gap to have to make up.

With numbers like those three years ago, the anti-legalization crew probably can just sit back and let it happen, then when the ballot gets voted down something like 35-65, they can be able to say "the people of ND have spoken and recreational cannabis has no place here" and can cruise on that for 10 years or however long it takes for more tide to turn.

SgtScruffy
Dec 27, 2003

Babies.



Of note this just allows doctors to prescribe/recommend CBD Oil; it doesn't allow for any sort of selling etc of actual cannabis

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply