|
CrazyLittle posted:would you prefer ios-xr? how about ASA os?
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 22:32 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 15:16 |
|
i don't "prefer" anything i just get a little grated by nbsd having specific opinions on EVERYTHING when its clear he knows nothing about networking beyond top of rack switches
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 22:54 |
|
arista seems like they won't get sued out of existence which is good because we have a bunch of them. alternatively quanta will sell you 48 10GbE ports for about 3.5k USD and then you put linux on it
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 00:22 |
|
i wouldn't mind doing layer 2 poo poo with whitebox/commodity switches but lol if you do your layer 3 with cheap garbage
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 02:32 |
|
I got a 2 layer poo poo for u right here
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 02:42 |
|
poo poo lasagne
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 02:58 |
|
Bloody posted:I got a 2 layer poo poo for u right here
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 03:39 |
|
Bloody posted:I got a 2 layer poo poo for u right here More like layer 8 poo poo
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 06:56 |
|
,
|
# ? Dec 21, 2016 23:48 |
|
lol
|
# ? Dec 21, 2016 23:52 |
|
mishaq posted:no routers use nx-os so a nexus 9000 is ... not a router?
|
# ? Dec 21, 2016 23:56 |
|
mishaq posted:i don't "prefer" anything i just get a little grated by nbsd having specific opinions on EVERYTHING when its clear he knows nothing about networking beyond top of rack switches it's true that i know fuckall about telecoms but this is not a thread about telecom providers
|
# ? Dec 21, 2016 23:57 |
|
It's 2016 just slap together whatever has the ports you want, unless you care about latency. Ooo my web interface lmao. ACTUALLY that's a below center rack switch not a top of rack switch ahaha we gotcha now!!! *pays extra licensing fees*
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 00:04 |
|
Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:It's 2016 just slap together whatever has the ports you want, unless you care about latency. Ooo my web interface lmao. cisco's "low latency" switches are their commodity trash lol
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 00:21 |
|
Yeah if you do care about latency you gotta actually know about vendors, or at least about arista because that's the one that's low latency.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 00:26 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:so a nexus 9000 is ... not a router? technincally... no? quote:Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 00:26 |
|
mishaq posted:lol if you think the majority of juniper, ericsson or nokia's revenue is due to "it spend" and not "verizon/at&t/telia sonera spend" Yeah but all of those guys have started mandating the move to SDN where they just buy COTs hardware and all the routing, switching, firewalls and poo poo go through that instead.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 02:29 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:so a nexus 9000 is ... not a router? nope
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 15:22 |
|
nbsd is literally incapable of not being a know it all on every possible topic in yospos lol Asymmetric POSTer fucked around with this message at 22:00 on Dec 30, 2016 |
# ? Dec 22, 2016 15:23 |
|
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 15:24 |
|
Janitor Prime posted:Yeah but all of those guys have started mandating the move to SDN where they just buy COTs hardware and all the routing, switching, firewalls and poo poo go through that instead. for on prem/hosted cpe and maybe simple provider edge poo poo, yeah still a long way away from the core not using dedicated hardware for routing due to performance of asics vs software and last mile access infrastructure will always be some form of hardware, but that's easily commoditized yeah
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 15:28 |
|
some omron cherry sanwa denshi
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 15:50 |
|
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 15:54 |
|
mishaq posted:for on prem/hosted cpe and maybe simple provider edge poo poo, yeah facebook and google are probably the most sdn on a network level.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 16:27 |
|
CrazyLittle posted:facebook and google are probably the most sdn on a network level. datacenter networking is an entirely different beast than service provider networking it's pretty loving cool though that the major buyers of submarine network capacity these days are google/facebook/microsoft et al instead of traditional telcos because of datacenter interconnection needs
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 18:36 |
|
mishaq posted:datacenter networking is an entirely different beast than service provider networking hell yeah
|
# ? Dec 22, 2016 20:00 |
|
|
# ? Dec 23, 2016 00:38 |
|
speaking of telecoms. is anyone terminating end user sessions on cheap commodity linuxes or is it cisco/juniper/alcatel all the way down
|
# ? Dec 23, 2016 08:01 |
|
i would imagine that would depend on who is responsible for managing your cpe and whether or not you give a poo poo about your sla being honored
|
# ? Dec 23, 2016 15:26 |
|
optus (Singtel in Australia) wrote an open source LNS called l2tpns to terminate l2tp DSL customers on but it hasn't been used for ages
|
# ? Dec 23, 2016 23:28 |
|
cheers, that looks very interesting. the other one I've seen mentioned is https://github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd
|
# ? Dec 24, 2016 00:06 |
|
HAH
|
# ? Dec 24, 2016 00:22 |
|
Olivil posted:
let's put a metal lever on a live high voltage machine i could never trust those fuckers
|
# ? Dec 24, 2016 00:46 |
|
come on DSLAM and welcome to the LAN
RISCy Business fucked around with this message at 06:24 on Dec 24, 2016 |
# ? Dec 24, 2016 06:22 |
|
Olivil posted:[MAGIC]
|
# ? Dec 24, 2016 09:45 |
|
abraham linkedin posted:come on DSLAM and welcome to the LAN lol lol
|
# ? Dec 24, 2016 21:56 |
|
mellanox's 10gbe/40gbe switches are surprisingly cheap. what the catch?
|
# ? Dec 25, 2016 04:10 |
|
Raere posted:mellanox's 10gbe/40gbe switches are surprisingly cheap. what the catch? i have indirect experience with some mellanox poo poo and its pretty good infiniband and ethernet in the same box
|
# ? Dec 25, 2016 16:46 |
|
Switching is the easy bit, routing is when the price escalates.
|
# ? Dec 25, 2016 17:29 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 15:16 |
|
i like ubiquiti but the lack of stacking severely limits their usefulness in anything other than the smallest scenarios
|
# ? Dec 25, 2016 17:38 |