Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Zeno-25
Dec 5, 2009

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Isn't the real question here if there are enough Democratic partisans/faithless electors in the MI, PA, and WI delegations to the Electoral College to swing the result of the election in a constitutional manner? It would be meaningless to send it to the House as Trump would just win there instead.

Also, is all this intel leaking about Trump being a useful idiot for Russia setting the stage for faithless electors to swing the election? As if Federalist 68 wasn't enough justification already...

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zeno-25
Dec 5, 2009

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Dr. Arbitrary posted:

If even one elector chooses a third option, the top three go up for consideration.

I thought this only applied if no candidate reaches 270 in the Electoral College?

  • Locked thread