|
Isn't the steam average always something silly though? Like I wouldn't be surprised if I haven't played about half of my library. E: Okay, nevermind. According to the achievement list 86% of players have completed the tutorial. Would have thought lower. I mean, it looks like a great game and I very much enjoy the LP but it looks like a game I'd personally bounce off pretty hard if I tried to play it. Teledahn fucked around with this message at 02:51 on Dec 28, 2016 |
# ¿ Dec 28, 2016 02:48 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:47 |
|
Scruffy, always do live commentary.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2017 07:43 |
|
You're trying to use low hormone levels and superior vision as an insult?Samovar posted:I've never heard that. Is there a paper that discusses that? I don't have a link to any specific case studies, but the demographics and genetic factors are fairly clear. 8.3% of (human) males have some sort of colour deficiency, while the rate is only 0.5% for females. The kindergarten explanation is that males (XY) are more vulnerable to genetic damage and defects than females (XX), as the X chromosome contains all of required genetic information for a human being and the Y mostly modifies that being into an emotionally stunted, overly muscled, generally hairy being. Two X chromosomes means a second chance if one has a nonfunctional gene. It's also exceedingly rare for humans to have serious deficiencies seeing blue light generally, being unable to distinguish the green shades from redder hues is much more Anyway. Enter the Gungeon is also neat. Please do continue on, dear dscruffy1. E: Well there's a heck of a post for the top of a new page. Teledahn fucked around with this message at 10:28 on Jan 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 09:53 |
|
Aerdan posted:Objection! You are correct on all points, however I believe the link between higher testosterone levels (typically a male trait but hardly unknown in females) and ease of muscle growth (along with body hair) is generally well established. Whether emotional facility and empathy is a societal or biological factor is perhaps best left for another thread. I should note; I would hardly wish for my post to be taken as undeniable inviolate irrefutable truth, merely amusingly wrong just enough to be informative. Also amusing. We like that here. Teledahn fucked around with this message at 10:29 on Jan 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 10:27 |
|
Samovar posted:You may like things amusing, but I demand everything should be as unfunny as possible. ??? ... ??!?!??!!???!???? E: \/ \/ \/ That is super neat! I'd never heard of such a fourth colour receptor. Teledahn fucked around with this message at 10:43 on Jan 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 10:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:47 |
|
Either that or start paying a bit more attention to the 'unsaved-changes-do-you-want-to-save' queries.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2017 05:57 |