|
So I'm guessing this is final confirmation that Deckard is ~not~ a Replicant after all?
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 16:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 02:17 |
|
|
Young Freud posted:The thing I hope they go with is something brought up in the K.W. Jeter books, that the replicants are built off templates of human beings, that, like Rachel, they're sort of clones with added genetic engineering. That way, Deckard in the first film could still be a replicant but you have his template still around. But why would he look different, older?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
I'm kinda disappointed by the costuming so far... c'mon, t-shirts? I know it's been 30 years and fashion changes, but one of the best thing about the original was all the bizarre fashion. Seriously, Deckard was like a goddamned Dr. Who:  
testtubebaby fucked around with this message at 19:08 on Dec 22, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Having dealt with all the Replicants, Blade Runners are now employed as the defacto Los Angeles fashion police. This was not called execution. It was called good taste.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2016 13:28
|
|
|
Marginally scared... don't like some of the cinematography and sets that feel too clean. Blade Runner is a movie that's if nothing else atmospheric and I want to see and feel that atmosphere tangibly. No one can fill the air with poo poo and make it look as good as Ridley.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 01:02
|
|