|
Red card was arguably legitimate, but shouldn't have been a penalty. Redmond clipped his heel but it was outside the box.
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
Shoren posted:Red card was arguably legitimate, but shouldn't have been a penalty. Redmond clipped his heel but it was outside the box. He continued to pull him down into the penalty area though. edit: finally been able to see a replay. There's definitely still contact going into the box, the decision is technically correct even though it looks wrong. EvilHawk fucked around with this message at 22:15 on Dec 28, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
EvilHawk posted:He continued to pull him down into the penalty area though. The pull was outside the box and ended outside the box. Redmond was just flapping at him once Alli was in the box. Since contact initiated outside of the box it shouldn't have been a penalty. You can make the case that the Soton defenders wouldn't have gotten across so the red card was correct.
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:19
|
|
|
Shoren posted:The pull was outside the box and ended outside the box. Redmond was just flapping at him once Alli was in the box. Since contact initiated outside of the box it shouldn't have been a penalty. You can make the case that the Soton defenders wouldn't have gotten across so the red card was correct. Mike Dean clearly thinks the contact still continues into the box. If he does then it is a penalty: "If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area and continues holding him inside the penalty area, the referee must award a penalty kick."
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
EvilHawk posted:Mike Dean thinks it is a penalty: no need for any extra verbiage edit: same for any red card
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
Now Tottenham are just bein mean
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
I thought they were showing a replay of the first Son goal lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
4-easy
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
I can't believe anyone thinks that wasn't a peno
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:39
|
|
|
Wasn't even a foul mate
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:48
|
|
|
What happened to that whole "no red card for non-violent penalties" thing? Does that not apply to this?
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
pik_d posted:What happened to that whole "no red card for non-violent penalties" thing? Does that not apply to this? No. It doesn't apply to professional fouls (which includes grappling/holding). It's not "non-violent" penalties, it's accidental fouls v professional fouls. Blame the media for not reporting it correctly at the time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2016 22:57
|
|