|
just a reminder that the bears had the second worst season in their franchise history that's like 100 years old and they DIDNT CHANGE A loving THING
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2017 16:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 04:04 |
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:bears haven't had a good safety since mike brown and i want them to draft hooker I'd rather have Adams from LSU
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 02:00
|
|
|
look to win a Superbowl you need a guy who can average 50 yards per game receiving. maybe 55. without players like that on the team you're going nowhere
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 16:07
|
|
|
Kawalimus posted:That's not my point. See if you just have all the great players then you don't need a Sharpe. Also Sharpe's numbers then were more like a TE's numbers were expected to be. Back then the only real amazing passcatching TE like they have more of today was Tony Gonzalez. And Sharpe was up there but had gotten older by that point. Sharpe would have had a much better season receiving totals if we had a better QB. The next year under Grbac he made the pro bowl. THough his numbers were basically the same but there were lots of reasons for that. there's no functional difference between an ismail and a sharpe, either way you're hoping for a guy to break a play all the way to the endzone (because your offense is bad enough it cant sustain drives) and outside of an insane, crazy fluke (sharpe's 96 yard play) you want the faster guy doing it that play is also funny because sharpe didn't make anyone miss and didn't outrun anyone , he caught a ball off balance and stayed on his feet and that was it mastershakeman fucked around with this message at 19:33 on Jan 7, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 19:30
|
|
) a Sharpe. Wallace is an Ismail. He'll make a bomb play but he won't make those insane catches in traffic like Boldin did in the Superbowl late. The Sharpes and Ismails complement one another.
|
I can't believe the Steelers have never beaten Brady in the playoffs
|
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2017 05:13
|
|