|
Bucs going 4-12 next year because the pendulum of progress has reached its apex
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 13:29 |
|
big money big clit posted:David Johnson has 20 touchdowns by himself. I think the proper word is "had"
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
Rex is mediocre and will take Washington to a solid 6-10 average record for the three years he is there before being fired again.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2017 23:21
|
|
a neat cape posted:Anquan Boldin is in no way shape or form Shannon loving Sharpe you delusional moron why are you so angry
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 04:05
|
|
a neat cape posted:I'm a fan of the San Diego Chargers Maybe you should get a therapist.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 04:08
|
|
Kawalimus posted:That really isn't what I mean though. The offensive unit in 2000 wasn't much good at all, especially the passing game. I guess Jamal Lewis and Priest Holmes(Pre KC but still) is a solid combination. But through the air, woof. That team shouldn't really have made it too far and everyone knew our offense was going to be our undoing, until it wasn't. And Sharpe is the guy who carried it to do better than it even should have. Because even though we were a dog poo poo passing team he was always able to get the team their one TD, their one big play they needed to just let the defense do their thing. So the fatally flawed team didn't die after all. The Bucs won the Super Bowl in 2002 and I have zero complaints about that team nor do I have a reason to look for something to complain about because whatever I could find to complain about is irrelevant because the Bucs won the Super Bowl in 2002.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
When 90% of your post about your Super Bowl winning team is about the negatives of that Super Bowl winning team you are just complaining... ...about a Super Bowl winning team.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 04:30
|
|
|
You sound like a patriots fan.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 04:34
|
|
Kawalimus posted:Well yeah but that's got nothing to do with looking back at the Superbowl team and talking about its strengths and weaknesses. Those are two separate deals. Yeah that bad offense really held you guys back that year.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 12:01
|
|
Kawalimus posted:Again that's completely missing the point. The offense was bad. That's the whole point how we were able to win with just strong defense. And for most of the year not even a scoring defense like the Bucs could be in 2002. We just had to stonewall the other team the whole game if we could and get that one or two big offensive play a game and that was what we had. This was before the days of Ed Reed. That sucks man. Wish you guys could have had more success that year.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 14:54
|
|
Cavauro posted:There is a difference between complaining and pointing out negative things that you wish had been different. Thje difference is this: *honks your nose, gently* now honk mine When you win a SB and all you talk about is the negative aspects of that team, you're just complaining.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 15:40
|
|
go go go go ROSCOE! posted:That's exactly what Cavauro was saying Then it would seem I agree
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 17:01
|
|
Amy Pole Her posted:Stop talking to Kawalimus he clearly has a mental disorder It's kind of humorous.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 00:20
|
|
|
drat sounds like that was a horrible season.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
Yeah those wildly fluke plays were happening all the time during that horrible season.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 19:50
|
|
Kawalimus posted:If that didn't happen I guarantee you the 49ers go on to win this game by a comfortable margin. i guarantee you it didn't happen though so it doesn't matter i wonder how the bucs could have lost in 2002... no i don't because they won and it rules.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2017 02:01
|
|
Kawalimus posted:That's why you have to appreciate these things when they happen. yeah i appreciate their 2002 win by talking about all of the ways they could have possibly lost
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2017 03:23
|
|
Kawalimus posted:That's fun though. What if the Eagles had won that NFC Championship? What would've happened in the Superbowl then? The Raiders might have won. Would that franchise have collapsed then? Who knows. The win was way more fun.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
They are drafting Watson.
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2017 22:55
|
|
go go go go ROSCOE! posted:Watson is gonna pull an Eli I wouldn't blame him tbh
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2017 23:19
|
|
go go go go ROSCOE! posted:His name is Dean and he pees Has he ever been to Moscow?
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Welcome Cowboys fans!!
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 02:06
|
|
all-Rush mixtape posted:Things that made you happy: Swept the Colts for the first time ever. I mean, Goddamn, it's been 15 seasons, you'd think it would've happened earlier. Still, both of those games made me happy. And the best thing? Pagano's coming back! i don't think you need to "fix the offense" as much as "get a QB from a d3 football team"
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2017 23:04
|
|
Kawalimus posted:??? I was joking around. You're an idiot
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 13:29 |
|
|
lol
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2017 04:23
|
|