Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

Zikan posted:

Noted pornography watcher Josh Marshall of TPM interviewed Keith Ellison on his show:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/why-does-keith-ellison-want-to-be-chair-of-the-dnc

After about 15 minutes or so they get into the nitty gritty in a way I think is useful.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

I mean I know the DNC position is the most insider position possible and that the members voting probably haven't learned a goddamn thing from the presidential election, but looking at this:

quote:

Perez aides say he's raised more than $825,000 for his campaign, with 73 percent of the donors contributing $200 or less.

against this:

quote:

His aides disputes Perez's lead in the race and claim a hefty advantage, though they would not share their internal count. Ellison staffers say he's raised nearly $1 million for his campaign, with 98 percent of donors contributing $200 or less.

If the idea is to get a person in there who can squeeze the maximum amount of cash and keep turnout high...the man raised a million dollars for a goodamn DNC race, mostly off the backs of voters, not donors. Hell Perez got ~200,000 dollars from some sugar daddy and still raised considerably less.

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

I mean, we at least agree that the Podesta emails were real right? So primary salt aside, I think the decisions Perez made in this strategy session reflect poorly on his potential term as DNC chair.

quote:

Labor Secretary Advised Clinton To Cast Sanders As Candidate Of Whites To Turn Off Minorities
Labor Secretary Tom Perez, who has spent a considerable amount of time boosting Hillary Clinton’s campaign, offered advice in February on how to change the narrative so people of color were discouraged from supporting Bernie Sanders.

The advice was sent in an email to Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, which was published as part of a third batch of emails released by WikiLeaks.

“Nevada is an opportunity to fight back on so many levels,” Perez argued. “First, the current storyline is that she does not connect well with young voters. Given that Nevada is far more demographically representative of America, I am confident that HRC can do well with all African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans (don’t forget the sizeable [sic] population of Asian Americans in Nevada, including Filipinos.).”

Perez continued, “Emmy and the team have a good plan to attract all minority voters. When we do well there, then the narrative changes from Bernie kicks rear end among young voters to Bernie does well only among young white liberals—that is a different story and a perfect lead in to South Carolina, where once again, we can work to attract young voters of color. So I think Nevada is a real opportunity, and I would strongly urge HRC to get out there within a couple days of [New Hampshire].”

Like others in Clinton’s campaign, he described Nevada as Clinton’s “firewall” and was unconcerned about how minorities would feel if they were described in such an exploitative way.

Clinton only won African Americans decisively in the Nevada caucus, according to entrance polls. But more Latinos voted for Sanders so Nevada did not make it abundantly clear that Sanders was incapable of attracting support from people of color.

Regardless, the Clinton campaign relied on the weaponization of identity and a politics of division to cast Sanders as a campaign for angry white people. It had an impact on discourse about the Sanders campaign and influenced supporters, like Salon’s Amanda Marcotte, who played a big role in the election folklore around “Bernie Bros.”

Marcotte wrote in March, “The Democratic case that their party is the party for everyone is undermined if the people who have traditionally held power in our society for most of its history, white men, continue to control the direction of the party. Sanders [would] probably win women and people of color in a general, but they [would] be voting for a candidate the white men picked.”

Considering how the Clinton campaign was explicitly interested in isolating Sanders by smearing him as some messiah for angry white men, what Marcotte wrote is even more disgusting. People of color were driven away from the Sanders campaign because people like Perez and others worked intensely to make him appear out-of-touch with minorities.

There was never evidence Sanders supporters were motivated by white male angst. In fact, American National Elections Studies found white identity was more important to Clinton supporters than Sanders supporters.

Perez also advised Clinton, “In my HRC advocacy, I now say how these people don’t have the time to wait for Senator Sanders to complete his quest for the perfect health care system, or the perfect immigration reform bill.”

“It gets a lot of good nods, especially when I talk about Kennedy McCain immigration and how Bernie opposed this, and immigrants are still suffering the consequences of inaction.”

In other words, the pain and suffering of minorities, to Perez, was something Clinton could rely upon to discourage minority voters from supporting radical change promoted by Sanders. If the campaign convinced them to be afraid and uncertain, they would support a technocrat, who triages the status quo and only commits to incremental changes, which are manageable to the system.

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

If it was Perez on his own, not Perez as a foil to Ellison with the blessing of the White House, I'd be fine with him. I was hoping he'd be Clinton's VP pick. If you search my post history, I've remarked previously why I support Ellison for his merits to the position, but I'm phoneposting.

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

Why would Biden's endorsement be a big tipping point? The man isn't in office anymore and always had O'Malley numbers when he ran for president. Most of the DNC members are sitting politicians or party chairs, wouldn't they be the ones most likely to know how badly the Obama years hosed them? Or is that indicative of the institutional rot?

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011


So who do we believe here?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011


Governor Malloy, second most hated governor in America, is not really an endorsement you want imo.

  • Locked thread