|
There are three matt qbs in the playoffs and I got the two bad ones  (four if Matty Ice goes down)
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 05:10 |
|
|
Doug Baldwin
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
Thomas Rawls
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 03:01
|
|
|
Paul Perkins RB
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 03:05
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:hahahaha theres no way I have a QB in the last three rounds and I'm already dead in the water I'm glad you changed that. I was gonna say you can wait for Brock. I am sure he'll be there.  I love that by the second turn, you seemingly went into full panic mode. Did my plan rattle you too! I'll go Jarvis Landry
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
Jason Witten and Adam Veterinary
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
Ben Nevis posted:Jason Witten and Adam Veterinary Who is Adam Veterinary? If you mean Vinitairi, the Colts are not in the playoffs
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
Sataere posted:Who is Adam Veterinary? If you mean Vinitairi, the Colts are not in the playoffs drat, I'm old fashioned. Ghostkowski.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
NE defense
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 04:53
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I'm glad you changed that. I was gonna say you can wait for Brock. I am sure he'll be there. Trying to figure out a playoff draft strategy amidst a super hectic 13 hour work day (4 claims is an "average" day, I did 9 today...) NOT IDEAL Luckily my OT will help pay one lucky goon
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Trying to figure out a playoff draft strategy amidst a super hectic 13 hour work day (4 claims is an "average" day, I did 9 today...) Yeah I was lucky. This week has been really light, so I got to nerd out a bit. I mean, my strategy was essentially who is going to advance farther in the playoffs and grab the top two quarterbacks, so I'm batting. 500
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
Tyreek Hill WR
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 12:05
|
|
|
Seattle DEF
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 13:26
|
|
|
I'd like to point out a couple scoring things. First, no negative points for turnovers on the offensive side. It should be -2 pts for fumbles lost and interceptions. Second, I think the defensive scoring should cap at 0, since we are forced to use all defenses available. So maybe make it 10, 7, 5, 3, 0 instead of 10, 7, 3, 0, -3.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
Ninja Bob is up, will email shortly, and we still need Ben to sign up at MFL..
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I'd like to point out a couple scoring things. First, no negative points for turnovers on the offensive side. It should be -2 pts for fumbles lost and interceptions. Second, I think the defensive scoring should cap at 0, since we are forced to use all defenses available. So maybe make it 10, 7, 5, 3, 0 instead of 10, 7, 3, 0, -3. yeah the turnovers was an oversight, good catch. Site makes my head spin Those were DEF scoring defaults, I went ahead and adjusted Everybody take a look at the scoring etc, bitch now or forever hold your peace/piece El Caganer fucked around with this message at 17:36 on Jan 6, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 17:29
|
|
|
El Caganer posted:Ninja Bob is up, will email shortly, and we still need Ben to sign up at MFL.. Ah, this is true. MFL is spotty at work. I can get their main page, but not many of the others. Is there a direct signup link or something so I can see if that works from here?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
Ben Nevis posted:Ah, this is true. MFL is spotty at work. I can get their main page, but not many of the others. Is there a direct signup link or something so I can see if that works from here? I don't even know.. it's not a big deal if you can remember to do it tonight, I just need you in by the time we finish. Assuming we finish.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
Steelers DEF
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
The nice thing about this is I got a four man one started with some co-workers. We are just emailing our picks and flying through. So I get to gamble through the Super Bowl
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Now that I'm not the one holding us up, I'm impatient... Spoeank!
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
GOLDEN sTATE warriors (and Sterling Shepard). (Sorry I was in a meeting)
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:GOLDEN sTATE warriors (and Sterling Shepard). It's fine. We are making our way through at a reasonable pace. Check your PMs when you get a second. No rush there either.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
Malcolm Mitchell
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 21:44
|
|
|
One more thing with the rules. Make it 0.04 pts for every yards passing and 0.1 pts for every yard rushing and receiving. Fractional scoring is the only way to play.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
Jared Cook
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 21:56
|
|
|
Sataere posted:One more thing with the rules. Make it 0.04 pts for every yards passing and 0.1 pts for every yard rushing and receiving. Definitely agreed on this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 22:00
|
|
|
Chiefs DEF
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Matt Bryant
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
Dion Lewis and Cole Beasley
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
Ninja Bob posted:Definitely agreed on this. All set
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Ben Nevis posted:Dion Lewis and Cole Beasley Really thought you were gonna go Latavius Murray there. I pick Not Brock. (Conner Cook)
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
Sataere posted:Really thought you were gonna go Latavius Murray there. Considered, but the short shelf life plus how horribly the Raiders ran against the Texans a few weeks ago made me think it's not worth it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
Dan Bailey PK
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:32
|
|
|
Falcons D
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:33
|
|
|
Ben Nevis posted:Considered, but the short shelf life plus how horribly the Raiders ran against the Texans a few weeks ago made me think it's not worth it. A bit sad everyone didn't sleep on Lewis, but I I think OAK wins, and that will add some value.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
Sataere posted:A bit sad everyone didn't sleep on Lewis, but I I think OAK wins, and that will add some value. I'm kinda feeling Houston there. OAK won last time, but it was close and on the back of a few questionable calls. OAK is going to be down to a third stringer at QB and their LT has an injured leg, so I think it swings HOU this time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
Ben Nevis posted:I'm kinda feeling Houston there. OAK won last time, but it was close and on the back of a few questionable calls. OAK is going to be down to a third stringer at QB and their LT has an injured leg, so I think it swings HOU this time. My counter argument is Brock.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:56
|
|
|
Sataere posted:My counter argument is Brock. It was a 1 score game with Brock last time! Though uh, I wouldn't really recommend drafting him.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 05:10 |
|
|
Cowboys DEF
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 00:00
|
|