|
anthonypants posted:the cia believes that rt is also a propaganda network because they do things like cover occupy wallstreet, or push the radical agenda that fracking is bad. the cia, and everyone else, believes that rt is a propaganda network because its mission is to disseminate news internationally to advance russian interests
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 09:05 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:if rt is anti-fracking its because it leads to lower energy prices. it's just anti-US government in general
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 22:28
|
|
|
raminasi posted:the cia, and everyone else, believes that rt is a propaganda network because its mission is to disseminate news internationally to advance russian interests
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:if rt is anti-fracking its because it leads to lower energy prices. but it also leads to more sick and dead americans
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 22:42
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:but it also leads to more sick and dead americans yes, but so does the American government since 2010
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:but it also leads to more sick and dead americans not really and even if it did its all Midwesterners so who gives a poo poo. give me that cheap energy. also if we hadn't stopped pursuing nuclear energy we wouldn't need so much nat gas.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 22:45
|
|
|
Fracking is good and if you disagree you are bad at physics and/or ignorant of just how much worse every other extraction method is given that nuclear might as well be Star Trek technology since the advanced countries have been voting to reject it forever now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 23:13
|
|
|
emoji posted:Fracking is good and if you disagree you are bad at physics and/or ignorant of just how much worse every other extraction method is given that nuclear might as well be Star Trek technology since the advanced countries have been voting to reject it forever now. Unless you're in Pennsylvania, where a previous administration made it legal to just dump untreated frack water into a river or municipal processing plant. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/us/27gas.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Producing literally anything artificial is insanely toxic and polluting if there are no regulations especially due to local corruption, yes. But it's still objectively better than all the other methods and can actually be done in a strict regulatory framework.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
raminasi posted:buzzfeed's dump of the trump piss doc is introduced with "none of this has been verified or is verifiable and some of it is already known to be factually incorrect but we're publishing it anyway for some reason" I dunno pissgate was pretty hilarious so buzzfeed earned points with me on that one
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
Pineapple goes on pizza.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2017 23:58
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:the cia believes that rt is also a propaganda network because they do things like cover occupy wallstreet, or push the radical agenda that fracking is bad. is this... is this a real post?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
The Management posted:is this... is this a real post?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 00:24
|
|
|
plz rename thread to blackula honeypot
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
emoji posted:Producing literally anything artificial is insanely toxic and polluting if there are no regulations especially due to local corruption, yes. But it's still objectively better than all the other methods and can actually be done in a strict regulatory framework. it's actually really bad because it isn't in any sort of regulatory framework and the gas companies are working very hard to it that way
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
I believe in the profession of journalism. I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of their responsibility, trustees for the public; that acceptance of a lesser service than the public service is betrayal of this trust. I believe that clear thinking and clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism. I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true. I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible. I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one’s own pocketbook is as much to be avoided as bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another’s instructions or another’s dividends. I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that the supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service. I believe that the journalism which succeeds best — and best deserves success — fears God and honors Man; is stoutly independent, unmoved by pride of opinion or greed of power, constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient, always respectful of its readers but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice; is unswayed by the appeal of privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance and, as far as law and honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship; is a journalism of humanity, of and for today’s world.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 01:38
|
|
|
Hed posted:I believe in the profession of journalism. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 01:38
|
|
|
we're gonna get another 4 years of trump in 2020 aren't we
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 01:41
|
|
|
Fabricated posted:we're gonna get another 4 years of pence in 2020 aren't we
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 01:44
|
|
|
Fabricated posted:we're gonna get another 4 years of trump in 2020 aren't we why do you think there will still be elections in 2020?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 05:29
|
|
|
infowars.com
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 05:53
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:it's actually really bad because it isn't in any sort of regulatory framework and the gas companies are working very hard to it that way You don't know what you're talking about. My first job was emission regs. Try 40 CFR Part 435.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 06:18
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:not really and even if it did its all Midwesterners so who gives a poo poo. give me that cheap energy. lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 06:33
|
|
|
the government of russia, the government of qatar and buzzfeed are my go-to sources for quality journalism
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 09:21
|
|
|
i really hope trump will kill buzzfeed
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 09:22
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:i really hope trump will kill buzzfeed i keep sending them dwayne johnson sex tapes and they just aren't holding up their end of the deal
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 14:16
|
|
|
guess we're talking about this in here now my point with my post back to anthonypants wasn't that they're definitely true you should believe the entire story completely immediately, but that rejecting it outright is being cynically overreactionary in the other direction, was trying to imply the correct perspective being skepticism while open to updates and new evidence before deciding solidly yes or no but failed pretty badly at anything other than thread making GBS threads basically posting on my phone in a canadian tire waiting room then disappearing to work was kind of dumb if i was actually trying to spur conversation regarding the actual story, it was originally reported by CNN not Buzzfeed which makes it less trustworthy imo, Buzzfeed has built an ok long-form journalism arm hiding behind all the listicle posts unlike CNN which has replaced everything with holograms retweeting and an animatronic taxidermied wolf blitzer the source of the docs has been confirmed as a former mi6 spy who i guess is currently in hiding http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-38591382 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/11/former-mi6-officer-produced-donald-trump-russian-dossier-terrified everything implying hes in hiding cause scared of russia vs "jfc I do not want to spend the next month of my life constantly hounded by reporters" is kind of hilarious though
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
buzzfeed has some okay reporting on domestic issues. too bad it's completely inaccessible due to their horrible clickbait site. the only way to find it is to follow their reporters on twitter
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 16:57
|
|
|
pr0zac posted:guess we're talking about this in here now
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 17:17
|
|
|
maybe he's former mi6 for a reason
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 17:21
|
|
|
http://www.metalinjection.net/latest-news/alex-jones-is-a-complete-fuckbag
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:33
|
|
|
I subscribe to game informer, mother jones, the atlantic, the economist, and scuba diving magazine support journalism you like
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:43
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:mcdonald's is home to the McChicken™ which is the best fast food chicken sandwich and probably the best all around fast food sandwich there is i like to put dave's insanity hot sauce on my mcchicken sanwdiches, op.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:50
|
|
|
Raere posted:I subscribe to game informer, mother jones, the atlantic, the economist, and scuba diving magazine please consider switching to the financial times instead of the economist, their takes on regulation and policy have a longer history of being sound and, more importantly, not batshit
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:52
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:i like to put dave's insanity hot sauce on my mcchicken sanwdiches, op.  If your dog is named Yard Dancer, I think we owe *each other* apologies.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
cnn is really bad
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
mother jones is also bad
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:57
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:cnn is really bad 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
mother jones is good overall
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 09:05 |
|
|
Raere posted:mother jones is good overall
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2017 03:07
|
|