Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

DEUCE SLUICE posted:

clear plastic over the air inlet of the vpn appliances

no, you organize your fellow workers in bangalore and raise their standards of living, too

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


Notorious b.s.d. posted:

no, you organize your fellow workers in bangalore and raise their standards of living, too

lol

PIZZA.BAT
Nov 12, 2016


:cheers:


Notorious b.s.d. posted:

solidarity, motherfucker, do you speak it?

I mean I'm all for workers of the world uniting but it's a genuine question. I'm guessing cutting the cables would be how you initiate the strike in this case

champagne posting
Apr 5, 2006

YOU ARE A BRAIN
IN A BUNKER

Rex-Goliath posted:

I mean I'm all for workers of the world uniting but it's a genuine question. I'm guessing cutting the cables would be how you initiate the strike in this case

flipping a power switch would be enough to deter even the most committed middle manager.

The Management
Jan 2, 2010

sup, bitch?
oh look, we're already discussing how to bring work to a halt. I wonder why unions have a bad reputation.

champagne posting
Apr 5, 2006

YOU ARE A BRAIN
IN A BUNKER

Work stoppage is the prime weapon of a union.

PIZZA.BAT
Nov 12, 2016


:cheers:


The Management posted:

oh look, we're already discussing how to bring work to a halt. I wonder why unions have a bad reputation.

i'm squinting my eyes @ this post not sure if joking or not

Asymmetric POSTer
Aug 17, 2005

Rex-Goliath posted:

i'm squinting my eyes @ this post not sure if joking or not

its from the management :tinfoil:

bring back your donald av

The Management
Jan 2, 2010

sup, bitch?

mishaq posted:

its from the management :tinfoil:

bring back your donald av

the trumpatar was a gift from my biggest fan. I thought it lent a voice to my posts that was not in line with my core message.

The Management fucked around with this message at 17:03 on Jan 20, 2017

BangersInMyKnickers
Nov 3, 2004

I have a thing for courageous dongles

The Management posted:

oh look, we're already discussing how to bring work to a halt. I wonder why unions have a bad reputation.

eat poo poo, scab

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde
After God had finished the rattlesnake, the toad, the vampire, He had some awful substance left with which He made a scab.

A scab is a two-legged animal with a cork-screw soul, a water-logged brain, a combination backbone of jelly and glue. Where others have hearts, he carries a tumor of rotten principles.

When a scab comes down the street, men turn their backs and angels weep in heaven, and the Devil shuts the gates of Hell to keep him out.

No man has a right to scab so long as there is a pool of water to drown his carcass in, or a rope long enough to hang his body with. Judas Iscariot was a gentleman compared with a scab. For betraying his master, he had character enough to hang himself. A scab has not.

Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage. Judas Iscariot sold his Savior for thirty pieces of silver. Benedict Arnold sold his country for a promise of a commission in the British Army. The modern strikebreaker sells his birthright, his country, his wife, his children and his fellow men for an unfulfilled promise from his employer, trust or corporation.

Esau was a traitor to himself: Judas Iscariot was a traitor to his God; Benedict Arnold was a traitor to his country; a strikebreaker is a traitor to his God, his country, his wife, his family and his class.

Bhodi
Dec 9, 2007

Oh, it's just a cat.
Pillbug

BangersInMyKnickers posted:

eat poo poo, scab

lampey
Mar 27, 2012

there are unions for grocery stores here in CA. why can't IT unionize?

The Management
Jan 2, 2010

sup, bitch?

lampey posted:

there are unions for grocery stores here in CA. why can't IT unionize?

because grocery stores employ low skill, low wage, largely replaceable employees with nothing but the power of collective bargaining to give them any leverage.

IT workers are (relatively) highly skilled, highly paid, possessing domain and corporate knowledge that makes them difficult to replace. they also generally receive a decent benefits package and have a robust and competitive employment market.

the reasons that make it reasonable to unionize grocery stores do not apply to computer touchers.

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde

The Management posted:

because grocery stores employ low skill, low wage, largely replaceable employees with nothing but the power of collective bargaining to give them any leverage.

IT workers are (relatively) highly skilled, highly paid, possessing domain and corporate knowledge that makes them difficult to replace. they also generally receive a decent benefits package and have a robust and competitive employment market.

the reasons that make it reasonable to unionize grocery stores do not apply to computer touchers.

lmao

Skinnymansbeerbelly
Apr 1, 2010
the biggest obstacle to socialism in america: the workers

Asymmetric POSTer
Aug 17, 2005

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

The Management posted:

because grocery stores employ low skill, low wage, largely replaceable employees with nothing but the power of collective bargaining to give them any leverage.

IT workers are (relatively) highly skilled, highly paid, possessing domain and corporate knowledge that makes them difficult to replace. they also generally receive a decent benefits package and have a robust and competitive employment market.

the reasons that make it reasonable to unionize grocery stores do not apply to computer touchers.

you would think the high skill would make IT amenable to craft unions (as opposed to industrial unions)

Chumbawumba4ever97
Dec 31, 2000

by Fluffdaddy

The Management posted:

because grocery stores employ low skill, low wage, largely replaceable employees with nothing but the power of collective bargaining to give them any leverage.

IT workers are (relatively) highly skilled, highly paid, possessing domain and corporate knowledge that makes them difficult to replace. they also generally receive a decent benefits package and have a robust and competitive employment market.

the reasons that make it reasonable to unionize grocery stores do not apply to computer touchers.

movie actors and baseball players are highly skilled and highly paid and are in a union, hth

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde
i think yosposter The Management was makin a joke y'all

jony ive aces
Jun 14, 2012

designer of the lomarf car


Buglord
itt the management makes worse posts than shaggar

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


I'm taking a big poo poo.

Silver Alicorn
Mar 30, 2008

𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓭 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓾𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓽 𝓸𝓯 𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓮

Citizen Tayne posted:

I'm taking a big poo poo.
           /

Fabricated
Apr 9, 2007

Living the Dream

jony ive aces posted:

itt the management makes worse posts than shaggar

The Management
Jan 2, 2010

sup, bitch?
I'll never be as cool as shaggar

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

Uncle at Nintendo posted:

movie actors and baseball players are highly skilled and highly paid and are in a union, hth

movie actors are unionized because the entire industry is unionized. stagehands and lighting designers and screenwriters won't work on a non-union production.

baseball players are unionized because they work in an industry dominated by a monopsony. there is effectively only one employer: the MLB and its cronies. even with the union, the bottom-end major league players make 1/100th what the top-end players do.

meanwhile, in the un-unionized minor leagues:

"lawsuits posted:

The lawsuit portrays minor league players as members of the working poor, and that’s backed up by data. Most earn between $3,000 and $7,500 for a five-month season. As a point of comparison, fast food workers typically earn between $15,000 and $18,000 a year, or about two or three times what minor league players make.

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


Notorious b.s.d. posted:


baseball players are unionized because they work in an industry dominated by a monopsony. there is effectively only one employer: the MLB and its cronies. even with the union, the bottom-end major league players make 1/100th what the top-end players do.


lol no. The MLB doesn't employ a single baseball player.

The MLBPA was formed to fight for the removal of the Reserve Clause from player contracts. Prior to that happening, free agency did not exist and players essentially became the property of the team that they first signed with.

The minor league teams are all staffed with players who are employees of major league teams.

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

Citizen Tayne posted:

lol no. The MLB doesn't employ a single baseball player.

The MLBPA was formed to fight for the removal of the Reserve Clause from player contracts. Prior to that happening, free agency did not exist and players essentially became the property of the team that they first signed with.

The minor league teams are all staffed with players who are employees of major league teams.

all of the teams are franchises of the MLB. as you pointed out, they didn't even "compete" internally for talent until the union forced them to do so

i am not sure there has ever been a better real-world example of monopsony than professional sports leagues in the u.s.

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them

Citizen Tayne posted:

lol no. The MLB doesn't employ a single baseball player.

The MLBPA was formed to fight for the removal of the Reserve Clause from player contracts. Prior to that happening, free agency did not exist and players essentially became the property of the team that they first signed with.

The minor league teams are all staffed with players who are employees of major league teams.

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


Notorious b.s.d. posted:

all of the teams are franchises of the MLB. as you pointed out, they didn't even "compete" internally for talent until the union forced them to do so

i am not sure there has ever been a better real-world example of monopsony than professional sports leagues in the u.s.

Maybe, but saying that the players are employees of "MLB" is factually incorrect. Each of the teams is a separate business organization.

Hell, the real name of the Pirates is "Pittsburgh National League Base Ball Club."

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene
what the gently caress do you think the reserve clause conflict was over if not monopsony conditions in the market? lol

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

Citizen Tayne posted:

Maybe, but saying that the players are employees of "MLB" is factually incorrect. Each of the teams is a separate business organization.

Hell, the real name of the Pirates is "Pittsburgh National League Base Ball Club."

sure, and guys who work for "Covelli Enterprises" are not employees of The McDonalds Corporation. but they still work at mcdonalds. just as every mcDonalds is a frinchise of The McDonalds Corporation, each team is a franchise of the MLB.

the MLB literally negotiates the labor contracts with the players association.

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


It was about collusion, not a monopsony. Calling baseball a monopsony is factually incorrect.

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

Citizen Tayne posted:

It was about collusion, not a monopsony. Calling baseball a monopsony is factually incorrect.

the only buyer is the MLB, regardless of the internal corporate structures. teams are creatures of the league, with no independent existence.

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


No. There are 30 separate buyers, which compete with each other for labor. You are wrong and you don't know what you're talking about.

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene
if the mlb is not a monopsony, why does the mlb negotiate union contracts instead of the hypothetically independent teams?

why did the union have to force the mlb to permit franchises to bid over each other?

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


Single point of negotiation is easier? I don't know. I'm not involved with that. I'm just pointing out that you are wrong and don't know what you're talking about with regard to the baseball labor market.

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them
wtf is a monopsony

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene
the "market," such as it is, is itself a creature of the negotiations between the union and the single buyer, the MLB

if the MLB wished to end all competition for players once and for all, they could lock out the players and begin again without the union.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud
Apr 7, 2003


bump_fn posted:

wtf is a monopsony

A market with a single buyer, which is emphatically not what baseball is.

  • Locked thread