|
I feel like it's become popular to take swipes at the idea of "civility". The problem with this is that civility, per se, isn't the problem. There's a difference between civility and spinelessness, IMO. You can be perfectly civil while saying "no I don't agree with you in any way and your ideas are atrocious".
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2017 08:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 19:38 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:The person you say that to will call you uncivil for saying that and use that to discredit you. That's the problem with "civility" as a primary political value. I think we can safely agree that anyone who wants "civility" as a primary political goal is at best a silly ninny.
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2017 08:23 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Agreed, but then we aren't published in the New Yorker, are we. Where I come from, that's a point of pride.
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2017 08:35 |