Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Is Communism good?
This poll is closed.
Yes 375 66.25%
No 191 33.75%
Total: 523 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Communism is so great that the east Germans had to build a wall to keep the capitalists out.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Bob le Moche posted:

Why would blogging even be a "job" under the dictatorship of the proletariat? Blogging also can just be this thing that you can do if you feel like it during the immense amount of free time you get after doing whatever short amount of highly-automated work is required of you to fulfill the basic needs of the collective.

If nobody wants to clean the toilets, then if the workers want clean toilets they can all agree to do a bit of extra non-toilet-cleaning work so the person who cleans the toilet gets some extra perks, or whatever. This is the opposite of our society where people who do the lovely but necessary jobs nobody wants to do are forced do them because they are kept super poor and desperate, and they are treated with contempt by everyone else.

Edit: yes, communism is good.

so how many extra perks does the toilet cleaner get? who decides that? what if he does a crummy job, do his perks get reduced by some amount? what if I don't make a mess in the toilet, should I have to do extra non-toilet cleaning work to support you disgusting monsters that can't figure out how to poo poo without it getting everywhere? jhfc, goons. it amazes me that you think some system that substitutes "or whatever" for money would ever work

mags
May 30, 2008

I am a congenital optimist.

Despera posted:

Communism is so great that the east Germans had to build a wall to keep the capitalists out.

I wish we had a wall around your posting.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

mister magpie posted:

I wish we had a wall around your posting.

Can't build a wall around the truth

Bob le Moche
Jul 10, 2011

I AM A HORRIBLE TANKIE MORON
WHO LONGS TO SUCK CHAVISTA COCK !

I SUGGEST YOU IGNORE ANY POSTS MADE BY THIS PERSON ABOUT VENEZUELA, POLITICS, OR ANYTHING ACTUALLY !


(This title paid for by money stolen from PDVSA)

gobbagool posted:

so how many extra perks does the toilet cleaner get? who decides that? what if he does a crummy job, do his perks get reduced by some amount? what if I don't make a mess in the toilet, should I have to do extra non-toilet cleaning work to support you disgusting monsters that can't figure out how to poo poo without it getting everywhere? jhfc, goons. it amazes me that you think some system that substitutes "or whatever" for money would ever work

I'm genuinely sorry that social relations between human beings that are not mediated through the market are so alien to you that you cannot even conceive of them. This is really sad and not actually your fault, for you are a product of capitalism and this is what it does to people.

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Bob le Moche posted:

I'm genuinely sorry that social relations between human beings that are not mediated through the market are so alien to you that you cannot even conceive of them. This is really sad and not actually your fault, for you are a product of capitalism and this is what it does to people.

Yes, every time I want a dozen eggs I want to negotiate a fair amount of labor "or whatever" in trade, what a simple system that isn't at all 100% retarded, because, you see, we live in caves 10,000 years ago

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

gobbagool posted:

Yes, every time I want a dozen eggs I want to negotiate a fair amount of labor "or whatever" in trade, what a simple system that isn't at all 100% retarded, because, you see, we live in caves 10,000 years ago

That isn't actually how primitive economies worked. Barter economies only appear after currency.

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Shbobdb posted:

That isn't actually how primitive economies worked. Barter economies only appear after currency.

so... currency predates barter. makes perfect sense. not to be a typical local, but I suppose you can give us some evidence of that?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I don't think communists actually have a problem with currency because it's quite useful, they have a problem with the distribution of it.

Bob le Moche
Jul 10, 2011

I AM A HORRIBLE TANKIE MORON
WHO LONGS TO SUCK CHAVISTA COCK !

I SUGGEST YOU IGNORE ANY POSTS MADE BY THIS PERSON ABOUT VENEZUELA, POLITICS, OR ANYTHING ACTUALLY !


(This title paid for by money stolen from PDVSA)

gobbagool posted:

Yes, every time I want a dozen eggs I want to negotiate a fair amount of labor "or whatever" in trade, what a simple system that isn't at all 100% retarded, because, you see, we live in caves 10,000 years ago

Don't confuse the fact that commies show humility and do not like to pretend to have the solutions all planned out for all the future hypothetical problems of socialist society; or the fact that, unlike crypto-fascist liberals, they actually have trust in the people's ability to democratically manage their own affairs once liberated from the shackles of capitalism; with anything other than just that.

"Or whatever" can absolutely include a currency system, and probably will, but might not. Capitalism is not defined by the existence of money but by the existence of private property, and the ability for those who own more than they need to invest it in capitalist ventures and thus claim a portion of the value produced by others. This is the crucial change that communists fight for: the democratic ownership of the means of production and the collective stewardship of nature, in common, for the people's benefit, instead of for the exclusive benefit of a few bourgeois super-oligarchs who are happy to let the masses starve and destroy our planet.

Communists are not communists because they have this perfectly planned out system, that they fantasize about one day being in a position where they can magically single-handedly impose it, as planned, onto everybody else. They understand history as a process which is shaped by economic forces and the masses of millions of people. Communists are communists because they recognize the contradictions of capitalism, the horrors that it produces, and the inevitability of its collapse. They are communists because they realize that when liberal bourgeois society fails and capitalism does inevitably collapse, the only remaining choice is between genocide, war, and fascism on one side, or socialism on the other.

Bob le Moche fucked around with this message at 21:49 on Jan 23, 2017

Bob le Moche
Jul 10, 2011

I AM A HORRIBLE TANKIE MORON
WHO LONGS TO SUCK CHAVISTA COCK !

I SUGGEST YOU IGNORE ANY POSTS MADE BY THIS PERSON ABOUT VENEZUELA, POLITICS, OR ANYTHING ACTUALLY !


(This title paid for by money stolen from PDVSA)

gobbagool posted:

so... currency predates barter. makes perfect sense. not to be a typical local, but I suppose you can give us some evidence of that?

Here's an article on the topic: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/02/barter-society-myth/471051/

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Yes History has been kind to communism

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

what a perfect encapsulation of The ATlantic, and this whole moronic derail


Economically Illiterate Magazine posted:

Adam Smith said that quid-pro-quo exchange systems preceded economies based on currency, but there’s no evidence that he was right.


or, you know, evidence that he was wrong either

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

gobbagool posted:

so... currency predates barter. makes perfect sense. not to be a typical local, but I suppose you can give us some evidence of that?

"Debt the First 5000 Years" by David Graeber would be the canonical text on the topic.

Barter intuitively makes sense and was created as a "just so" story by early economists. However, this story is wholly unsupported by anthropology. If you look at primitive societies, you don't find barter anywhere. Instead, the only places where barter has been found to exist are places where a currency system has broken down (prisons, frontier settlements, post-disaster, etc.).

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015
Gift economies aren't actually barter, hth.

Neither are tributary economies.

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Despera posted:

Yes History has been kind to communism

Communism, anarchism, primitivism, all great and successful ideologies that a certain subset of goons seem to think will solve their problems like that they can't get a date or fit through the door without turning sideways

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

Bob le Moche posted:

Don't confuse the fact that commies show humility

Sure as hell not on this board

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015

gobbagool posted:

Communism, anarchism, primitivism, all great and successful ideologies that a certain subset of goons seem to think will solve their problems like that they can't get a date or fit through the door without turning sideways

Excuse me sir but we're here to watch a movie.

Bob le Moche
Jul 10, 2011

I AM A HORRIBLE TANKIE MORON
WHO LONGS TO SUCK CHAVISTA COCK !

I SUGGEST YOU IGNORE ANY POSTS MADE BY THIS PERSON ABOUT VENEZUELA, POLITICS, OR ANYTHING ACTUALLY !


(This title paid for by money stolen from PDVSA)

gobbagool posted:

what a perfect encapsulation of The ATlantic, and this whole moronic derail

Notice how gobbagool so easily dismisses the research of anthropologists, sociologists, and historians because they don't fit the naive notions about pre-capitalist society that the bourgeoise has worked very hard to instill into him through business 101 textbooks and neoliberal think-thanks like the Adam Smith Institute.

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Shbobdb posted:

"Debt the First 5000 Years" by David Graeber would be the canonical text on the topic.

Barter intuitively makes sense and was created as a "just so" story by early economists. However, this story is wholly unsupported by anthropology. If you look at primitive societies, you don't find barter anywhere. Instead, the only places where barter has been found to exist are places where a currency system has broken down (prisons, frontier settlements, post-disaster, etc.).

So for a primitive subsistence culture gets by by stockpiling food and then eating it, each according to their need. seems like an effective alternative to our global economy. Now, where's my new iphone? My poor goddamned kids are both sporting iPhone 6s and that makes me sad

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

gobbagool posted:

Communism, anarchism, primitivism, all great and successful ideologies that a certain subset of goons seem to think will solve their problems like that they can't get a date or fit through the door without turning sideways

All are primarily criticisms of Capitalism and hypotheses for alternatives.

The alternatives may or may not be correct and do not entirely agree with each other but all are largely unified in their criticisms of the status quo, which are accurate, and demand a solution.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

gobbagool posted:

So for a primitive subsistence culture gets by by stockpiling food and then eating it, each according to their need. seems like an effective alternative to our global economy. Now, where's my new iphone? My poor goddamned kids are both sporting iPhone 6s and that makes me sad

That's actually not how they worked.

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015
"There is no other way, capitalism, or living like ancient hunter gatherers" - noted economist gobbagool

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

gobbagool posted:

or, you know, evidence that he was wrong either

there's actually a lot of evidence he was wrong, from current observations of uncontacted tribes to archaeological reconstruction of work flow in ancient societies. caroline humphrey, who also gets quoted in the ATL article, is one of the most respected scholars on the subject, by the way.

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Bob le Moche posted:

Notice how gobbagool so easily dismisses the research of anthropologists, sociologists, and historians because they don't fit the naive notions about pre-capitalist society that the bourgeoise has worked very hard to instill into him through business 101 textbooks and neoliberal think-thanks like the Adam Smith Institute.

Sure, let's take the lessons learned from observing stone age and worse civilizations and pretend somehow that they apply to our modern global civilization. I mean, obviously I'm the stubborn idiot here. Did you finish reading "everything I need to know I learned in kindergarden"? Seems like that would be extremely your poo poo

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Hey if it worked when the average lifespan was 20, it can work now

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

OwlFancier posted:

All are primarily criticisms of Capitalism and hypotheses for alternatives.

The alternatives may or may not be correct and do not entirely agree with each other but all are largely unified in their criticisms of the status quo, which are accurate, and demand a solution.

they demand a solution like you demand that donald trump listen to you on whatever your pet issue is

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Shbobdb posted:

That's actually not how they worked.

that's exactly what your article in the atlantic says about Iroquois Indians, did you not read what you petulantly demanded I read?

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015
You sound like someone who believes they're using the socratic method.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

gobbagool posted:

that's exactly what your article in the atlantic says about Iroquois Indians, did you not read what you petulantly demanded I read?

I didn't demand you read an article.

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

botany posted:

there's actually a lot of evidence he was wrong, from current observations of uncontacted tribes to archaeological reconstruction of work flow in ancient societies. caroline humphrey, who also gets quoted in the ATL article, is one of the most respected scholars on the subject, by the way.

funny, leftists always criticizing Adam Smith, but every single idea coming from the left about how to manage an economy always seems to end up with lots and lots of starving people. Weird, that!

edit: sorry, forgot to state the shibboleth: communism does not fail, it can only BE failed

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015
"The british empire, famously a communist dictatorship" - said by a famous projectionist

Dommolus Magnus
Feb 27, 2013
You'll find that this question has already been answered back in 1987 by the band Negativland, as heard here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2iKWMePyxU

Also, apparently Christianity is stupid, who knew?

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

gobbagool posted:

funny, leftists always criticizing Adam Smith, but every single idea coming from the left about how to manage an economy always seems to end up with lots and lots of starving people. Weird, that!

edit: sorry, forgot to state the shibboleth: communism does not fail, it can only BE failed

Ah, so you also don't understand Adam Smith. Things are starting to make sense now.

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

gobbagool posted:

funny, leftists always criticizing Adam Smith, but every single idea coming from the left about how to manage an economy always seems to end up with lots and lots of starving people. Weird, that!

yeah i'm not seriously going to get into a debate on the merits of communism with you in this incredibly serious thread, just wanted to drop in and give some background on the barter theory of money since i happen to know a little bit about the topic :shrug:

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Shbobdb posted:

Ah, so you also don't understand Adam Smith. Things are starting to make sense now.

Please, by all means, share your understanding of Adam Smith and within context explain how totally awesome communism or anarchism or whatever dumb alternative you support is in contrast to capitalism.

Agnosticnixie
Jan 6, 2015
"Anarchism is a failed system, why it can't even withstand a concerted assault by three fascist empires single-handedly with the full might of two spanish provinces"

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Doesn't matter even the stupidest Americans know communism doesn't work. I just like trolling them because it's soo easy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_voting

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Bloc_emigration_and_defection

Shibawanko
Feb 13, 2013

gobbagool posted:

So for a primitive subsistence culture gets by by stockpiling food and then eating it, each according to their need. seems like an effective alternative to our global economy. Now, where's my new iphone? My poor goddamned kids are both sporting iPhone 6s and that makes me sad

Information technology is bad for people and if communism means returning to some less sophisticated technological state where we drive bikes and simple cars and don't mine coltan (and of course, it does not) I only want it to happen more.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

gobbagool posted:

they demand a solution like you demand that donald trump listen to you on whatever your pet issue is

That... What?

What does that even mean?

  • Locked thread