Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Is Communism good?
This poll is closed.
Yes 375 66.25%
No 191 33.75%
Total: 523 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

dk2m posted:

Assuming you're talking about the US - what capitalist class? What does that even mean in this day and age? It's not 1905 anymore, there are no evil guys twirling mustaches behind their huge oak desk. The people that run businesses respond to external pressures - communists don't. You can protest and peacefully change society in ours, you cannot in a communist system. There will be winners and losers like in every system, but the moral case in a communist society is built around the idea that anyone that doesn't fall in line is a traitor to revolutionary ideals. Even neo-communists STILL disdain socialists - if they can't even get along with fellow leftists, what hope is there for anyone else?

The basic practical questions of communism are never, ever answered. It's always couched in broad, sweeping "history is on our side" rhetoric.

And yes, I too remember rolling back child labor laws.

The like ten CEOs who own a huge portion of global capital cannot, in fact, be swayed or affected in any meaningful way by peaceful protest, and we are completely beholden to them in terms of the global power structure.

They're also the ones responsible for climate change killing us all in 10-15 years. So yeah, hope that helps.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011
Communism killed 20 million people but capitalism killing 7 billion will be fine because,

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

asdf32 posted:

Democracy was most certainly an ideological threat to the monarchy.

not nearly as much as bourg nationalists like napoleon

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

falcon2424 posted:

No, it's really not.

It was ok-ish for the time he was writing. But he does stuff that's stupid by modern standards. Like looking at the average contribution of inputs, instead of marginal contribution.

His models end up looking as a special case of a general equilibrium model, where you throw in weird constraints like, "and all production is linear, because reasons."

Marx is historically interesting. But his work isn't doing much in modern econ research.

I'm pretty sure the labor theory of value has held up even into the model of 21st-century global capitalism.

Also if you think Marxism made Russian and Chinese societies worse based off of the famines they caused, then fine. But you should actually travel to those countries and ask people who lived through those times whether they think their lives improved compared to those of people in neighboring countries. I think you'd be surprised.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011
That's true but you're pulling my leg if you think even complete state control over media can hypnotize people into thinking their lives are better off now than they used to be. There are plenty of people kicking around who suffered but didn't die during the Great Leap Forward and are still alive to this day.

Anyway ask Russians how they feel about "shock therapy" and American "democracy-building" efforts.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

steinrokkan posted:

How about asking former Soviet satellites about no longer being sucked dry by the Soviet imperial parasite?

I'm sure that despite getting to no longer have the Russians boss them around, most of the former Soviet satellite states still weren't happy with American business parasites sucking out what was left of their economies.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

steinrokkan posted:

Lol, sure thing, buddy, I'm mad I never had the opportunity to wait in line for the last roll of toilet paper or bribe a bunch of guys just to get a plumber scheduled to fix the sink. Or that I will never get to see the majestic sights of tree-melting acid rains from all the progressive Communist industry.

I'm not saying they liked Soviet-style collapse better. Unfortunately, that collapse was shortly followed by another catastrophe when we finished the job of picking the bones clean.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

hakimashou posted:

Denying, minimizing, or attempting to rationalize or justify the horrors of communism is denying, minimizing, or attempting to rationalize or justify the horrors of the holocaust, and for equally despicable motives.

Nah that's actually the far right line on things.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

Bulgogi Hoagie posted:

the world owes central planning a debt as well for ridding the world of the awfulness that was USSR

in the long term, central planning increased life expectancy, literacy, access to health care, and production in russia and china lol

basically


Cerebral Bore posted:

You mean the central planning that took the USSR from a burned-down peasant country to the world's second industrial superpower in ~30 years and this with the most destructive war in modern history throwing a spanner in the works?

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

Bulgogi Hoagie posted:

it also fractures your country into tiny pieces or forces you to switch to a free market model in the long term so that's good

the chinese government still owns pretty much all the land and their mixed economy is way more mixed than most other nations even now. also quasi central control over that economy means they're better equipped than the US to handle, say, a climate catastrophe that would require the government to be able to enact economic change instead of having the corporations pay you off to legislate how they want you to...

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

Bulgogi Hoagie posted:

very reminiscent of hitler seizing jewish funds by the way

hey

as a jew

go gently caress yourself for trying to compare an innocent ethnic group to some landlords who would kill their own livestock before they allowed it to be taken away lol

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011
If you're not willing to expropriate you gotta get out of the Marxist kitchen.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

steinrokkan posted:

If those Jews are not going to let loose of their hoarded private property for the benefit of the people, there needs to be some solution to the problem.

you have a tenuous grasp of history

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

TomViolence posted:

The bolsheviks were a bunch of backstabbing, paranoid, powerhungry assholes in the years immediately after the civil war and no-one should earnestly attempt to rehabilitate that poo poo because it does the case for communism more harm than good.

yeah i should clarify that when stalin deported all those ethnic minorities and basically chewed up and spat out the peasantry for daring to resist him...that was not good

taking boug farms and land though...that's very good.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

Bulgogi Hoagie posted:

it's unfortunate that the two sets "ethnic minorities" and "bougie farmers" and "peasants" happened to overlap so much huh

you realise the kulaks were peasants right?

yea that's why i tried to clarify. stalin killed a ton of people he didn't have to because he was paranoid as gently caress and also wanted to consolidate all political power around himself. same with mao.

it doesn't matter anyway because the petty bourg is shrinking pretty quickly these days. but the idea of taking their stuff was never a bad idea, stalin was just a murderous dickhead.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

Bulgogi Hoagie posted:

people now arguing itt that corporations are exactly the same as a soviet centrally planned economy lol

What do you think "collectivism" means and what do you think a corporation is, lol.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

Bulgogi Hoagie posted:

my line of descent means jack poo poo but me having grown up in russia and having gone through it's systems may have something to do with you хуйло поганое

How old are you? Are you confusing communist Russia with the Russia we pillaged the economy of?

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

hakimashou posted:

They cribbed that from genocidal communism too

When the Nazis took power in Germany, communists in Russia had already murdered more than ten million people.

Hello to anyone reading the thread who wasn't sure that half of "anti communists" really just have far right sympathies.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

White Rock posted:

Question, what is the general take on say the french and american revolution, or smilar revolutions? Where they "worth it" it terms of body count? Why? Is the outcome all that matters?


Would the American civil war be a good thing if the north would have lost?

The Reign of Terror proves that the Assembly can never work and we should stick with the best system we have as proven by history, monarchy.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

SyHopeful posted:

The 1960s post-colonial Africa where former colonial powers attempted to destabilize all of the nascent nations to maintain control of the resources that attracted colonizers in the first place? Where Western powers propped up or installed corrupt politicians or autocrats like Mobutu, Bokassa, or Bongo? Where Lumumba was assassinated for friendly overtures to the Soviets even though even the CIA officer tasked with killing him said he was no communist? Where the Belgians supported Katangan secession so they could keep their hands on the resources there, or the Brits supporting Biafra for their oil? Where apartheid South Africa occupied Namibia and invaded Angola to fight efforts to build socialism? How about the myriad scandals of France's ELF?

Are we going to forget the intentionally under-developed conditions that existed in post-colonial Africa, a legacy of the extractive, exploitative nature of Western capitalism in Africa?

Of course not. We can't be anti-communist without ignoring the hundreds of millions of people killed by capitalist, imperialist exploitation.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011
There is enough food, water, and housing for everyone in the world, actually. Capitalism manufactures scarcity by design where there really is none.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

asdf32 posted:

Socialism is hardly more irrelevant than when talking about global poverty. If first world leftists got their nationalist revolutions the rest of the world would be hosed and expected to say thank you for the end of "exploitation".

It's really sad how little you know about pretty much anything.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011
Actually I think you'll find that most people are on board with abolishing jobs that only serve to make money off of other people while providing no value yourself.

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

Benjamin Arthur posted:

Capitalism has killed more people than both those ideologies combined though.

Also nazis were capitalists and were enabled into power by center-right liberals.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011

tekz posted:

That is honestly surprising to me. How open/free was the voting in that referendum?

More open than the 1996 elections when we intervened to fix the election and stop the populace from reelecting the communists. Of course the revisionists in this thread who want to pretend communism is some insane genocide philosophy would paper over this fact.

  • Locked thread