|
Should it be legal for other people to assault you if they disagree with you? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
|
183 | 49.06% |
| No |
|
190 | 50.94% |
| Total: | 328 votes | ||
|
Call Me Charlie posted:I'll actually try to serious post. Actually you can. It is not a requirement to be for or against all violence against speech. It is in fact acceptable to judge things on a case-by-case basis, as it should be. That's not to say that I necessarily do support any specific case of violence against speech, but you're being overly reductive.
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 18:42 |
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Pretty difficult to fight organized fascism without arms imo. Somebody born without arms could just learn a very kick-focused martial art, like savate. It's 2017, there's no need to still have ableist beliefs like this one. SMDH.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
enki42 posted:Non-nazi people. Why would they say that? You do know that guns are very common here in America, right? Like we even have an amendment about them and everything.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
enki42 posted:This might be my not being an American showing - but it would be strange to openly brandish or even carry a gun to a protest, wouldn't it? People open carry and brandish in restaurants, my dude.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
enki42 posted:I think it's an argument worth having that the civil rights movement wouldn't have been successful without them, but what I was responding to was implying that MLK didn't accomplish anything. It wasn't saying MLK didn't accomplish anything, it was saying MLK was wrong on this specific issue. You don't think he was literally infallible, do you?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2017 22:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 18:42 |
|
|
enki42 posted:No, of course not. I think he was right in terms of his non-violent approach. Can you point to any specific instances of Nazis being defeated with non-violence?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2017 22:52
|
|