Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Should it be legal for other people to assault you if they disagree with you?
This poll is closed.
Yes 183 49.06%
No 190 50.94%
Total: 328 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Sulphuric Asshole
Apr 25, 2003
How do you guys feel about Illinois Nazis?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sulphuric Asshole
Apr 25, 2003
Is punching the leader of the NBPP justified for his support of killing white babies?

Sulphuric Asshole
Apr 25, 2003
Ghandi protested without being violent.

Sulphuric Asshole
Apr 25, 2003

General China posted:

I think the end result of Ghandi and his protests was hundreds of thousands dead when it came to partition.

He did not help.

He got England out of India and freed people from a salt hoarding tyranny. I'd say that helped.

Sulphuric Asshole
Apr 25, 2003

TomViolence posted:

I don't know what resistance movements you studied last time you picked up a history book and did some analysis but any strategy built around getting punched in the face is a bad strategy.

The sit ins during the civil rights movement was a strategy built around getting punched in the face.

Sulphuric Asshole
Apr 25, 2003

TomViolence posted:

Think about this. Ever wonder why free speech is considered important in the first place?

Speech is the foundation of all political power. What is political power?

Political power is the ability to project violence.

The state protects speech so that people may exert political influence in order to direct and project the violence of the state against appropriate targets both at home and abroad.

Nazis seek to use this influence to enact a policy of ethnic cleansing. It cannot be argued that this agenda is in any way nonviolent. The threat of violence is ever-present in their rhetoric and in their mass manifestations as political agitators.

To violently confront such provocation is self defence.

If free speech allows for intangibly retarded definitions of "self defense" and "power" perhaps I haven't been critical enough of free speech all these years.

Sulphuric Asshole fucked around with this message at 20:28 on Jan 29, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sulphuric Asshole
Apr 25, 2003

TomViolence posted:

Their declared intent is to kill, evict or otherwise oppress anyone who isn't a white heterosexual male. If that isn't grounds for self defence, what the gently caress is? Does the knife already have to be buried in your gut before you're allowed to protect yourself?

No, but It has to be greater than a group of spineless retards saying poo poo without any actual follow through or ability to carry out their genocide. "Hey round up the trailer park and bring some extra percocet, we's gots us a holocaust"

Sulphuric Asshole fucked around with this message at 20:48 on Jan 29, 2017

  • Locked thread