|
Bolow posted:I don't disagree with anything that dude says but fascism has to be met with a shitload of resistance and it can't be debated with or allowed to have any platform to speak on. I'd say it's about time to have actual proper hate speech laws but not with this loving administration at the helm And therein lies the rub. How would you write such a law? Hot Karl Marx posted:Canada has hate speech laws joat mon fucked around with this message at 22:30 on Jan 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 22:28 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 15:48 |
|
Bolow posted:Speech promoting hate or encouraging genocide against minorities, religion, or sexual orientation seems like a pretty solid place to start. What words would promote hate? Would intent matter? Are 'minorities' racial or demographic minorities? MA-Horus posted:brb gonna go back in time to 1941-1945 and tell my grandma's brothers not to murder nazis because we have to respect their feelings joat mon fucked around with this message at 23:16 on Jan 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 23:12 |
|
Well, I'm glad I'm not in Canada. (I hope no Canadians find that hateful)
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2017 23:21 |
|
Robert Clary (LeBeau) was the one in concentration camps
|
# ¿ Jan 27, 2017 04:32 |
|
Heh. I like it.
|
# ¿ Jan 30, 2017 16:24 |
|
So, girl with MAGA hat = Nazi. Got it. How about sexually assaulting "nazis"? Good to go?
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2017 05:36 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 15:48 |
|
It's not arguing in bad faith, it's pointing out what should be an absurdity. How's this - the thread consensus is that punching who speak of disenfranchising others is acceptable at worst, good and necessary at best. Does macing people who wear the apparel of an opposing political faction fall under the same exception? Where is the line?
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2017 05:56 |