Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
PleasingFungus
Oct 10, 2012
idiot asshole bitch who should fuck off

Dolash posted:

Here's a question for those of you in the States who've been moving in the direction of "leftists and minorities should be armed for their protection", the Clinton and Obama administrations both had a whole lot of militia activity whose whole rhetoric and style was built around preparing for some kind of upcoming civil war or calamity, but were for the most part left alone. Can other groups reasonably hope to adopt that style of rhetoric without immediately becoming labeled as terrorists?

Ask the original Black Panthers!

(Terrorist designations seem inevitable for any heavily-armed leftist group, yes. And I'd expect such designations to have considerably more consequences than those applied to militia groups - partially because the left, being predominantly urban, is easier to reach, and partially because the State is always better armed against threats from the left than the right.)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread