|
what projector do I buy preferably one with lasers
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2017 08:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 04:50 |
|
|
or just drop $600 on the Nikon P900 getting rid of all the chromatic aberration doesn't matter as much as long as you can get footage of a dope deal from 2 blocks away https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-0X3xJf-kg
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2017 06:58
|
|
|
Mad Wack posted:are we still sharing how we listen to music https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8V3mIL0EXc
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
Only 2 months until NAB guys Super-hyped for Blackmagic to release yet another camera whose features solely consist of "record" and "show audio levels"
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2017 08:13
|
|
|
I miss going to NAB. One year I found a vuln in one companies products, the engineer there didn't give a gently caress when I demoed it to them in person, so a filed and got a CVE.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2017 04:30
|
|
|
pagancow posted:ok its obvious youre on a budget because Youtube wont be paying you for a few years but yo gently caress B&H they are a lovely company. Buy your stuff from Adorama if you're in NYC. They had a really good deal to build out their warehouse facility in the Navy Yard, and then right when their workers were tired of their bullshit and started talking about unionizing they immediately move it to NJ. last year the feds filed a lawsuit against them for being racist and their response was to offer to pay a $120k settlement.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2017 06:47
|
|
|
pagancow posted:in a world...where numbers don't matter
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
LG inexplicably rebranded HDR10 to HDR Pro for no good reason other than to confuse people and make them less likely to buy their TV because well this Xbox works with HDR10 and this doesn't have that. guess I better buy a safnsung. Linguica posted:Having four different HDR standards is bad, you know what we need to do? Make a fifth standard https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-and-amazon-video-deliver-next-generation-hdr-video-experience-with-updated-open-standard-hdr10 we have to pay licensing fees for HDR so if we make our own HDR, people will have to pay us!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
pagancow posted:just wait until you see a calibrated rec.709 next to a 4,000 nit display in a best buy. It will move TVs people overwhelmingly bought TVs at Best Buy that had motion interpolation demoed so guess what is enabled by default now
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2017 08:16
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Just suck it up and get davinici resolve. You wont get any color management until you buy some hardware. The free version of DaVinci Resolve is a disgustingly good deal - the real things you get if you pay $300 (used to be $1000, used to be $30,000) are multi-GPU support, >UHD export, noise reduction, and the ability to have multiple people working on the same project simultaneously. Woo.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
Linguica posted:wait was the davinci resolve thing a real suggestion. i thought it was pagancow pagancowing Yeah he is - they've taken what was previously just a color correction app (albeit very good) and tacked on editing. Originally it was about as good as you'd expect it to be, but now it's getting to be surprisingly decent. If you're actually editing for anything real you'll still want to do Avid/Premiere. I wouldn't say that this is a 'broken clock twice day' situation but pagancow is pretty much this: technically right on average but the getting there is insane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WBzHm2fqHE Blackmagic's business strategy is apparently 'wait for some pro A/V company to nearly go bankrupt, bail them out, actually finance their product development' and surprisingly this actually works well, because you can still charge comical amounts of money for hardware as opposed to even 'pro' software. lol if you think someone's gonna color correct a TV series with a MacBook Pro and an iPad as a control surface when the budgets currently exist to support post houses that cost 4 and 5 figgies per hour. Jimmy Carter fucked around with this message at 06:53 on May 11, 2017 |
|
#
¿
May 11, 2017 06:48
|
|
|
is there a commonly-accepted reason why The Scene has not standardized on HEVC yet? I’m guessing it’s just because dumpster hardware doesn’t have hardware decoding support yet
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:because "the scene" is notoriously slow in changing their ways? some of them were still splitting movies up into chunks that would fit on CD-Rs in the early 2010s SD things get put into MP4 containers, everything else into MKV because
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
Option A here's this codec which costs x dollars to use and has hardware support so customers can watch for an extended amount of time and view more ads Option B here's a codec which costs $0 but might cost 2x possibly more, and requires a development cost of >$0 to support oh and might have hardware support in like 4 years
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
Pioneer Kuro Plasma
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
I torrent all my blu-ray rips then Archive them on LTO tapes
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
just give me the red mags out of the camera I'll cut my own copy together.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
univbee posted:baby got FLAC
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2017 17:22
|
|
|
univbee posted:hdcp is amazingly dumb given how easy it is to bypass Boxes which downgrade HDCP 2.0 to very-easily stripped 1.4 have been ruled to not be in violation of the DMCA because no actual encryption is broken. Jimmy Carter fucked around with this message at 18:47 on Aug 7, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:is there a price floor for dolby vision displays? like do the specs basically necessitate better tech and materials, or will we see even cheapo displays with it eventually you can get DoVi sets from TCL for like $650
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
I just signed up for MoviePass it’s gonna be great for next 3 months before they run out of cash. Gonna see all the NC-17 films I can on VC money.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 06:45
|
|
|
pagancow posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgBH_UoTu_U have there been any major films released which were shot and mastered in 8K?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
Guardians of the Galaxy 2 was shot in 8K but VFX and mastering were at 2K
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
The answer is, as always, Sony has a random model for you https://www.sony.com/electronics/cyber-shot-compact-cameras/dsc-rx0
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
josh04 posted:also man, hi-8. i transferred a bunch of hi-8 tapes earlier this year and they are a bad, bad format. I think there's still a couple of 767s which are close to retirement that have Hi-8 decks for inflight movies because it didn't make financial sense to put "modern" inflight systems in them.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
ALDS Postseason branding package looks like someone left one of the component video cables unplugged on a plasma TV circa 2006 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:digital video existed but it was really expensive and still looked worse than 16mm film. a digital video camera that allowed the same control over the image as a movie camera (manual focus, swappable lenses, manual exposure, etc) was way more expensive than renting a 16mm film camera and still looked worse. it’s always been about learning about the limitations of things and how to work with it. you still gotta get a grip truck to light stuff with film or digital (unless you’re that guy who covertly shot a movie at Disney World). Sound is still sound.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2017 17:06
|
|
|
pagancow posted:hahahahahahahahhahahahahhagahaha it’s an open secret that Disney is sitting on a 4K restoration of the original, un-specialialized trilogy
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
Munkeymon posted:what is the deal with foveon? I remember reading about them in a magazine back when I read magazines and I assumed that technology was everywhere now. is it all the money to license or super loving hard to make the sensors or what? They got bought by Sigma and they still churn out a few cameras here and there. You can get an image that is a ~40 megapixel equivalent out of a $1200 body, instead of having to drop $3-4k. It'll be sharp af, but the tradeoff is that it's worse at low light, dynamic range, speed, and focusing compared to the big boys. Good for shooting landscapes (maybe portraits), but that's mostly it. It lets you win any arguments about who has the most hipster camera.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
yo pro tip: you can go to the Sony Experience in NYC and they’ll just let you borrow any camera body and 2 lenses for free for the day. The only things they didn’t have were the A7R III and the RX0.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 27, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
more bits = better than
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:well, everyone was wondering what they were going to do regarding hdmi 2.1 supporting variable refresh TV taxes can be weird in some areas. Like, it has an HDMI port = it's a TV, but DisplayPort = it's a monitor (and a computer peripheral and thus taxed lower). There can also be taxes based on screen size, which is why you'll see HDMI ports on EU SKUs (watching TV on a smaller-sized computer monitor more popular there) but not US, since you're paying a per-port licensing fee and everyone watches on their 65-inch class Vizio they got from wal-mart.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2018 20:28
|
|
|
if you're truly a hardcore video user, your NLE is going to be an install of FFMPEG and a hand-crafted bash script.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2018 04:35
|
|
|
carry on then posted:"i call this gun the FRAMERIPPER" Big loving GOP
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2018 03:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 04:50 |
|
|
Aix posted:im gonna make sure the next good codec will be called "ayyvi"
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2018 19:20
|
|