Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
qirex
Feb 15, 2001

fritz posted:

tron guy kicked the whole thing off a week or so ago : https://medium.com/@jmaynard/mpga-d4b72ec08ed4

he's literally mad that people with different opinions exist and dare to want to go to an event

idk how the exact people who spend so much time and energy whinging about "snowflake culture" are all such whiny bitches

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

qirex posted:

idk how the exact people who spend so much time and energy whinging about "snowflake culture" are all such whiny bitches
every accusation is a confession

Doc Block
Apr 15, 2003
Fun Shoe
what a bunch of insufferable people

and LOL @ an overweight person like Susan Sons teaching a martial arts session.

DONT THREAD ON ME
Oct 1, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
Floss Finder

Doc Block posted:

what a bunch of insufferable people

and LOL @ an overweight person like Susan Sons teaching a martial arts session.

no no, she's teaching a marital arts session

neutral milf hotel
Oct 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
esr is something special

https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/858488129266868225

http://lists.penguicon.org/pipermail/penguicon-general-penguicon.org/2017-May/000159.html

quote:

Coraline Ehmke has said to me, directly on Twitter, that "You should
feel unsafe." In context, that she desires me to feel unsafe.

https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/858488129266868225

That, gentlemen and ladies, was the mask slipping. In SJW-land,
there will never be "safe space" for those who oppose the commissars.

rjmccall
Sep 7, 2007

no worries friend
Fun Shoe

FMguru posted:

every accusation is a confession

Jay Maynard posted:

Sumana Harihareswara, who I found out the hard way was a hard-core feminist as well;

:stonk:

jony neuemonic
Nov 13, 2009


actually if you won't tolerate my bigotry, you're the bigots. checkmate sjws.

George
Nov 27, 2004

No love for your made-up things.
look at these 1984 sjw thought police gestapo sjws telling me i should be afraid that history will frown on my essay calling brown people alien poo poo zombies

aardvaard
Mar 4, 2013

you belong in the bog of eternal stench

a-ha! i have caught you in a web of your own lies! for you see: how can you claim to be tolerant - if you do not tolerate my intolerance????

Gazpacho
Jun 18, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
Slippery Tilde
granted that some sjws don't know how to chill, anti-sjws respond by demonstrating that they, too, can refuse to chill

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene
best-selling authors should not be invited because your inclusion some how excludes me, the real sci if fan :colbert:

Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 05:53 on May 7, 2017

Gazpacho
Jun 18, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
Slippery Tilde
lol if some half your age accuses you of being a bigot and you don't respond with "ok whatever"

Suspicious
Apr 30, 2005
You know he's the villain, because he's got shifty eyes.
will someone please think of the middle age white men

Gazpacho
Jun 18, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
Slippery Tilde
maynard raymond is a tremendous tool but that doesn't mean people should feel at liberty to make veiled threats to his personal safety

Gazpacho fucked around with this message at 07:03 on May 7, 2017

rjmccall
Sep 7, 2007

no worries friend
Fun Shoe
i still want to know what's the "hard way" of finding out that someone is a feminist

i assume it involves acting like a total rear end in a top hat and getting called out for it

Cybernetic Vermin
Apr 18, 2005

Gazpacho posted:

maynard raymond is a tremendous tool but that doesn't mean people should feel at liberty to make veiled threats to his personal safety

he "feels unsafe" because the event went out of its way to have unisex bathrooms. i think his right to personal safety, as he views it, is pretty much void here

The Management
Jan 2, 2010

sup, bitch?

rjmccall posted:

i still want to know what's the "hard way" of finding out that someone is a feminist

i assume it involves acting like a total rear end in a top hat and getting called out for it

he was referring to his erection

Gazpacho
Jun 18, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
Slippery Tilde
i don't care if his definition of "unsafe" is silly. throwing the same inflammatory language back at him, in public view, is irresponsible & not conducive to desired outcomes

Cybernetic Vermin
Apr 18, 2005

Gazpacho posted:

i don't care if his definition of "unsafe" is silly. throwing the same inflammatory language back at him, in public view, is irresponsible & not conducive to desired outcomes

well, have fun uselessly wringing your hands for the benefit of the worst of humanity i guess

Doc Block
Apr 15, 2003
Fun Shoe

rjmccall posted:

i still want to know what's the "hard way" of finding out that someone is a feminist

i assume it involves acting like a total rear end in a top hat and getting called out for it

he probably hit on her, got turned down, and probably assumed the reason she didn't respond well was because of feminism and not because she just wasn't interested and/or didn't care for his PUA poo poo.

Gazpacho posted:

i don't care if his definition of "unsafe" is silly. throwing the same inflammatory language back at him, in public view, is irresponsible & not conducive to desired outcomes

LOL it's obvious she didn't mean that someone should physically harm him, but you go right on ahead white knighting for esr

Doc Block fucked around with this message at 08:25 on May 7, 2017

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






Doc Block posted:

what a bunch of insufferable people

and LOL @ an overweight person like Susan Sons teaching a martial arts session.

Excuse me, but fatshaming is explicitly forbidden in the penguincon code of conduct

neutral milf hotel
Oct 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
mods plz rename me tron guy's package

George
Nov 27, 2004

No love for your made-up things.

BeOSPOS posted:

mods plz rename me tron guy's package

its explicitly defined

Agile Vector
May 21, 2007

scrum bored



Suspicious posted:

will someone please think of the middle age white men

bit early in the week for a new kelly comic

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-
"wrong side of history" is such a stupid phrase

power botton
Nov 2, 2011

big scary monsters posted:

"wrong side of history" is such a stupid phrase

how does it feel to be on the wrong side of history

JawnV6
Jul 4, 2004

So hot ...
ugh

fritz
Jul 26, 2003


indeed : http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7524

Silver Alicorn
Mar 30, 2008

𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓭 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓾𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓽 𝓸𝓯 𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓮
what isn't esr up to?

George
Nov 27, 2004

No love for your made-up things.
Actual contribution to free software projects

Max Facetime
Apr 18, 2009


this is bad ... (reads on) ... this is worse !!


would Eric expect the King and Queen of Cheese to have male parts or female parts..?

Symbolic Butt
Mar 22, 2009

(_!_)
Buglord

that's a shitton of comments, I'm surprised esr is "popular" like that

The Management
Jan 2, 2010

sup, bitch?
hopefully he's up to his eyeballs in quick drying cement

George
Nov 27, 2004

No love for your made-up things.
but guys, hes a calm and rational experimental mystic

RISCy Business
Jun 17, 2015

bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork bork
Fun Shoe

George posted:

yeah the jokes write themselves

finally catching up on this thread and :sbahj:

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-

power botton posted:

how does it feel to be on the wrong side of history

:argh:

fritz
Jul 26, 2003

George posted:

but guys, hes a calm and rational experimental mystic

also a blogger for the libertarian science fiction society : http://lfs.org/blog/freedom-in-the-future-tense-a-political-history-of-sf/

Gazpacho
Jun 18, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
Slippery Tilde
"programmer"

fritz
Jul 26, 2003

charles stross, as seen at http://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/11889097.html

quote:


I am burned out on esr ever since the legendary Scottish Panel at the last San Jose worldcon. (I got to share a mike with his halitosis when he started ranting at China Mieville about pyramids of skulls.)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fritz
Jul 26, 2003

i found this description of that panel btw

quote:

http://www.emcit.com/emcpr085.shtml
That Scottish Panel

One panel was so memorable that it deserves its own section. After all, it has already generated hundreds of messages on RASFF. Clearly it made a big impression on people.

The title of the panel was "Socialists in Kilts: Revolutionary Scottish SF – Banks Stross & MacLeod". Quite a mouthful, and quite a panel. As it turned out, the panelists did not include a single Scotsman, and only one Socialist, China Miéville. Charlie Stross was perhaps the most appropriate panelist, being mentioned in the title and living in Scotland. However, he did make a point of the fact that he was neither Scottish nor a Socialist. The other two panelists, presumably added to provide an alternative political view, were Laurence Person and Eric Raymond, both of whom are American Libertarians of the lunatic stripe. It was their arrogant and childish behavior that made the panel so notable.

Before going any further I should declare my own political interest. In Ken MacLeod terms I am closer to Anarcho-Capitalism than anything else. Dave Reid might have been a bastard, but he was right a lot of the time. Certainly I find New Mars far preferable to living under the iron jackboot of the Cassini Division. I have spent the last decade or so of my working life creating competitive markets in the electricity industry. I am, in short, the sort of person who, in less guarded moments, China will accuse of murdering babies in Africa. However, because I have to try to make Capitalism work in the real world, and in an industry where a perfectly competitive market is almost impossible, I am well aware of the practical difficulties involved. Messrs Person and Raymond, on the other hand, seemed to have no concept of practical issues at all. In fact they didn’t seem to care, as long as they had an opportunity to toss insults around. I have never been so ashamed of my own side in a political debate in all my life.

The format of the panel was established very early. Poor Charlie tried manfully to be responsible and sensible, and he did manage to get the mike for long enough to give a fascinating exposition of modern Scottish political history. China spent most of the panel trying not to explode, and not quite always succeeding. Person and Raymond behaved for much of the time like a couple of mischievous schoolboys poking at a caged lion with a very long stick. For the most part they had nothing constructive to say, but they took every opportunity to be snide, rude, insulting and otherwise badly behaved. They seemed to have no interest in civilized debate. Perhaps it is not surprising that two Americans would have no idea what Socialism is (or rather would assume that Socialism and Stalinism are identical and indivisible), even though they have the shining example of California to look at. But if Person and Raymond did know anything about political theory, they clearly had no great interest in displaying it.

The success of the panel seems to have been to a large extent a result of how badly two of the panelists behaved. That got people interested, and that got them talking about the actual subject. Practically, however, I only noted two things of interest arising from the panel. The first was a comment from Farah Mendlesohn along the lines of, "anyone who says, ‘Ken MacLeod believes’ is at least 24 hours out of date". Whilst that may have been a little unfair to Ken, it certainly made the point that the Fall Revolution series is a debate, not a statement of belief. Person and Raymond persistently ignored this view, even after they had been beaten over the head with it several times.

The other thing I noticed (and I think I have Janet Lafler to thank for pointing this out) is that extremist Libertarians have one more thing in common with extremist Communists. Both of them believe that their political theory has been scientifically proven. In his few lucid moments, Raymond was fond of claiming how Hayek had "proved" that Socialism was unworkable, and that by implication Raymond’s own political ideas would inevitably triumph. In practice, of course, every political ideal is unworkable. Indeed politics would not exist if that were not the case. Anyone who believes otherwise has nothing useful to contribute to political debate.

  • Locked thread