|
EvilHawk posted:Congrats Spurs you've joined Plymouth on the list of teams that have lost to Liverpool in 2017 he should join up with benitez so colback never plays again ftw
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 01:01 |
|
|
Spangly A posted:everyone said this about ronaldo and rooney/tevez's work. Are you arguing that Suarez is not a better partner up front than Robert Firminho? that's loving insane m8 no, i just dont think theyre good enough to break into Barcelona's starting XI. theyd look like Liverpool caliber players in that system. and to be fair to Liverpool, if they could stop gifting away games due to poor concentration and having an unsettled defense, they could pose a real threat to the world class clubs. similar to Dortmund in that respect.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
Liverpool are mint, Spurs are shite = 2 easy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
Xabi posted:2 easy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
We look good when teams try to attack us. Am glad Klopp finally dropped Can, we look so much better and mobile with Wijnaldum in the side.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
Arsenal got lucky. Clear handball for the first goal, no red card? Undeserved loss for Hull imo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
PirateBob posted:Arsenal got lucky. Clear handball for the first goal, no red card? Undeserved loss for Hull imo. Why would it be a red card?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
blue footed boobie posted:Why would it be a red card? Not for Sanchez' handball, I was referring to the situation where Hull were through against the last defender. Only a yellow given by the coward Clattenburg.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
Ewar Woowar posted:We look good when teams try to attack us.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
PirateBob posted:Arsenal got lucky. Clear handball for the first goal, no red card? Undeserved loss for Hull imo. Seeing as it wasn't a handball for Alexis' first goal and clearly DOGSO for the second, plus Hull didn't actually score, I would say it was a pretty deserved loss.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
Amazing 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 03:27
|
|
|
This sums up all the things I could say about Arsenal tbh
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 04:19
|
|
|
Shoren posted:Seeing as it wasn't a handball for Alexis' first goal and clearly DOGSO for the second, plus Hull didn't actually score, I would say it was a pretty deserved loss. So the ref admitted in the tunnel at half time after seeing a replay it was clearly a handball. So yes it was obvious. Secondly the second handball given a pen the arm was by his side. Then not giving gibbs a red for Dogso. It was obvious bent reffing mate.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 06:51
|
|
|
if the only reason the ball ends up in the net is it hit someones hand it probably shouldn't be a goal
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 08:47
|
|
|
Jose posted:if the only reason the ball ends up in the net is it hit someones hand it probably shouldn't be a goal If your hand is raised above your shoulder its probably safe to say its in an unnatural position.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 11:22
|
|
|
Byolante posted:So the ref admitted in the tunnel at half time after seeing a replay it was clearly a handball. So yes it was obvious. Secondly the second handball given a pen the arm was by his side. Then not giving gibbs a red for Dogso. It was obvious bent reffing mate. If he was bent why did he apologise? Maybe a half time crisis of conscience?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 12:30
|
|
|
fat gay nonce posted:If he was bent why did he apologise? Maybe a half time crisis of conscience? Thierry Henry apologised after the game to the Irish, didn't stop it being a dogs act and bent to gently caress
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 12:35
|
|
|
EvilHawk posted:No Gomez is criminal. What's the point of him if you're down two CBs and you play a poo poo DM there instead Because the last time he played he looked like a teenager who's been out injured for over a year, and he needs time to get back in form?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 13:01
|
|
|
Strawman posted:Because the last time he played he looked like a teenager who's been out injured for over a year, and he needs time to get back in form? The last time he played was literally right after he got back from injury, in a back four consisting of Lucas, Moreno, and TAA (IIRC). He's played plenty of times for the u23s since and looked decent again. It didn't matter in the end (luckily).
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 13:30
|
|
|
I was all fired up for epic Barton/Costa douchebaggery when the teams walked out to Arcade Fire's Wake Up, but it looks like Bumley will roll over easily. David Fishwick wept
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
Byolante posted:So the ref admitted in the tunnel at half time after seeing a replay it was clearly a handball. So yes it was obvious. Secondly the second handball given a pen the arm was by his side. Then not giving gibbs a red for Dogso. It was obvious bent reffing mate. Byolante posted:If your hand is raised above your shoulder its probably safe to say its in an unnatural position. Why are you commenting on what is legal and what is not when you have absolutely no understanding of the laws of the game? Law 12 (page 37) posted:
Additional considerations for Law 12 (page 120) posted:
First, Sanchez didn't deliberately handle the ball. He was stretching his leg forward to kick the ball into the net and his arm moved up instinctively to balance himself. His only intent was to kick the ball. Second, his hand did not move toward the ball at all during this move, it ricocheted twice after he kicked it and unfortunately for Hull it last struck his hand and ended up goalbound. Everything was so close that he had no chance of knowing the ball would bounce up as it did (unexpected ball) and had no way of reacting quick enough to move his hand regardless. Finally, the rules clearly state "the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an infringement" meaning it's not safe to say anything about unnatural positions because "unnatural position" isn't even in the laws. Handling is a foul because it's easy to gain an advantage from moving your arm into the ball. Just because you have arms hanging off your body does not mean that if the ball hits them then play should immediately be stopped. Don't forget that the assistant ref had a view clear as day that the ball struck Sanchez's had and yet he advised Clattenburg to let it stand. And the red card for Clucas was also bang-on correct. If you actually bothered watching the replays he does in fact move his arm back toward the ball (when his body is going away from it) and stops the ball from entering the net; again, the position of the arm has nothing to do with the infringement. It does everything that Sanchez's hand didn't and therefore it was a good call. Just because Clattenburg is an idiot and broke the rules by watching replays at halftime and proceeded to speak out of line by apologizing to the Hull players doesn't mean he got the calls wrong in this case. All it takes is actually looking at the facts and having a base level of critical thinking.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:53
|
|
|
Tek a bow Robbie Brady.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
The referees organization said it should have been disallowed as well
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
 lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Phwoar what a hit son
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Hoooo Robbie Brady has a peg on him
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Did Costa duck that?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
straight up brolic posted:The referees organization said it should have been disallowed as well And they're just as incapable of understanding the rules as Byolante is. Just because they feel morally outraged (or just plain biased) doesn't make the goal illegitimate. Also, tasty loving free kick from Brady. Lovely stuff.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
Lol noted Internet forums poster thinks he understand the rules better than the referees
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
the referees are instructed to not give handball goals because it leaves a bad taste in the mouth, not in the spirit of the game, etc. they are not enforcing the laws as they are written, but no one really cares.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
Shoren posted:And they're just as incapable of understanding the rules as Byolante is. Just because they feel morally outraged (or just plain biased) doesn't make the goal illegitimate. Lol your opinions are really really bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
straight up brolic posted:Lol noted Internet forums poster thinks he understand the rules better than the referees https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj0njC7H3Jk
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
Southampton's first goal probably shouldn't have counted yesterday for the same reasons, why isn't anyone making autism noises arguing about that?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:04
|
|
|
Shrapnig posted:Southampton's first goal probably shouldn't have counted yesterday for the same reasons, why isn't anyone making autism noises arguing about that? They aren't at risk of having an asterisk added to their Fourth Place Trophy
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:05
|
|
|
Shrapnig posted:Southampton's first goal probably shouldn't have counted yesterday for the same reasons, why isn't anyone making autism noises arguing about that? It was mentioned on MOTD How did Burnleys not score
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:07
|
|
|
Shoren posted:And they're just as incapable of understanding the rules as Byolante is. Just because they feel morally outraged (or just plain biased) doesn't make the goal illegitimate. That's possibly the dumbest post ever made on these forums and that includes some of Woobi's greatest hits. If the match official's organisation aren't the people with the greatest authority to rule the laws of the game then we may as well just put football out of it's misery now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
if burnley win this it's definite objective proof there is home advantage wizard magic placed upon turf moor
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 01:01 |
|
|
Byolante posted:That's possibly the dumbest post ever made on these forums and that includes some of Woobi's greatest hits. If the match official's organisation aren't the people with the greatest authority to rule the laws of the game then we may as well just put football out of it's misery now. Football's already dead, they're just kicking the corpse. The PGMOL stated that the goal should have been disallowed not because it violated a law of the game, but because "it doesn't sit well in the game." What a load of bollocks. It was just as unfortunate as if the keeper tried clearing a ball, hit he ref, then rebounded into his net. Hull should be bitterly disappointed in either case because neither broke any laws. https://twitter.com/7amkickoff/status/830487733135044609
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2017 15:18
|
|