Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
Why the Kings are interested in a four-year college player with limited upside who has shown little ability to do the thing he is supposedly elite at is beyond me, but hey.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
While this offer is 2004 Vince Carter levels of poo poo sandwich, I've been thinking of who would have made a better trade partner. We have to assume that Boston was just straight out on Cousins, so who else had the assets and/or wanted to abort their rebuild to get a guy who may or may not re-sign?

Phoenix: Maybe, but you'd have to give up what little young talent you have and picks, which means you're Desert Sacramento and not going anywhere.
Lakers: Guess they like their (questionable) core and don't want to give it up to be a little bit less bad and leave the cupboard bare.
Houston: No young talent with upside.
Dallas: Rebuilding, no assets.
Philly: Don't need a big man.
Minnesota: See Philly.
Portland: Guess they didn't want to give up CJ or Lillard.

Aside from that, there are really no teams with the stuff to make a deal work. Frighteningly, this may have been the best offer out there.

(That said, not getting more than one first makes this one for the ages.)

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
So the trade clearly isn't officially consummated yet - is there any chance the Kings could see the total trashing they're getting and get cold feet? Normally I'd say handshake deals are solid, but it is The Kings, After All

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
Sac fans, is there ANY sense of "relief" or anything? Like, yes, this is a truly terrible trade but finally, FINALLY, the Kings can attempt to move on and get out of the 9-11th seed morass.

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010

Spoeank posted:

The Kings gave away all their picks then decided to tank and got what will be a mid-first round pick and an old rookie for one of the most dominant forces in the NBA.

There's nothing to be had here.

But hey, Sam Hinkie's looking for a job!

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
You honestly couldn't have gotten a second rounder for Matt Barnes?

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
sacramento.craigslist.org

/for sale

/sporting

"Lightly Used Best Big Man in the NBA, 50 Cents on the Dollar OBO"

*checks "No, I do not want to be contacted with other better offers" box*

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
I was joking earlier but...maybe the Kings should hire Hinkie?

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
Maybe Isaiah Thomas just told Boston brass he didn't want to play with Cousins again?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

roundmidnight
Jul 9, 2010
Interesting! I vaguely remember some mild passive-aggressive shots one way or the other when Thomas left but maybe that was overblown.

  • Locked thread