|
Will Perez force the dems left? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
|
33 | 6.38% |
| No |
|
343 | 66.34% |
| Keith Ellison |
|
54 | 10.44% |
| Pete Buttigieg |
|
71 | 13.73% |
| Jehmu Green |
|
16 | 3.09% |
| Total: | 416 votes | ||
|
mcmagic posted:That doesn't seem super helpful. Neither does reminding voters that your party is worthless and loves jerking itself off to how worthless it is
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
mcmagic posted:Not winning a seat in a R+20 district just doesn't make the top 50 things that make the democratic party worthless. This isn't the hill to die on. Losing it by 6% after the DNC refuses to fund the running democrat does though. Thanks for sticking up for Perez lying about adopting a 50 state strategy.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:This race isn't the one to judge their 50 state strategy on. Their version of the RedMap project will be and we won't know about that probably for years. Remember that there are pretty much ~120 republican held seats that they are more likely to win in 2018 than Kansas 4. Why not? It was a winnable election, dems knew it was winnable, and they ceded it to republicans by abandoning the dem campaigning for it why? Why do you think a good 50 state strategy entails handing republicans victories till 2018?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Clyburn, just like the rest of the democrats, inspires zero confidence. That is for sure. It's all bunch of 80 year old's for Christ's sake. Ftfy
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
Cerebral Bore posted:They're going to win like three of those seats by refusing to field candidates in the rest of them. actually they'll only win 1. they'll refuse to fund 2 of those candidates
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
new thread here: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3816838
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2017 16:43
|
|