Will Perez force the dems left? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Yes | 33 | 6.38% | |
No | 343 | 66.34% | |
Keith Ellison | 54 | 10.44% | |
Pete Buttigieg | 71 | 13.73% | |
Jehmu Green | 16 | 3.09% | |
Total: | 416 votes |
|
Frankly I hope Bernie does run just because it will be funny watching so called voices of the democrats say they're voting Trump.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 00:56 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 11:34 |
|
Fulchrum posted:What the gently caress is wrong with your brain that you think that the "elite liberals" are literally - not figuratively or metaphorically, but literally - telling their base to get hosed? http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/02/01/nancy-pelosi-town-hall-capitalism-sot.cnn Yeah its just that the house minority leader did just that. Fulchrum posted:Because he's "sold out" and they need to "send a message", yes. Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 01:09 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 01:03 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Actually, I still want to try and unpack this, because even if it matched any political reality where Republicans didn't treat their base as brainless cretins who will pull the lever no matter what, it's literally "Billy's mom and dad bought him an Xbox for Christmas! YOU'RE THE WORST PARENTS EVER AND I HATE YOU!" Well democratic votvers are not republican voters. YOu see Iknow you'd like to be a republican, but you can't treat democratic voters like poo poo then expect votes.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 01:07 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Perhaps you should be a Republican. That way you can read all of Breitbart, not just the parts about Hillary, Obama and the dem leadership that is totally trustworthy and you feel the need to keep spreading. I have never quoted Breitbart. Now you on the other hand spread Breitbart propaganda about Ellison. Please explain why you like your taxes so low and people without healthcare.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 01:39 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Why was Ellison spreading Breitbart propaganda about himself by saying that he once supported the Nation of Islam? So wait Hillary wasn't being corrupt by allowing poor Haitians to suffer by preventing them from getting minimum wage? Is wanting Haitians to get a minimum wage make someone a Nazi? Also why did what Ellison once did along time ago mean you hated him? That frankly is racist.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 01:53 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Haitians got a 72% increase to minimum wage you delusional piece of poo poo. It says a lot about how deeply you care about them and weren't just using it exactly as Breitbart does, as a cud gel against Hillary for being a bitch, that you didn't even know that. They still didn't get what they desperately needed. Also I feel bad for anyone who has to work in a sweatshop that is told to suffer further for the benefit of a imperialist power. Its to bad that you think its a good thing they stare only slightly less. But then that's sociopathy.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 02:06 |
|
JeffersonClay posted:You think it's a good thing for sweatshop laborers to lose their jobs and have repeatedly stated you don't give a poo poo what happens to them as long as US manufacturing benefits. So wait you support companies destroying Haitian workers jobs if suddenly they only make 900% Profits not 958%? Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 02:24 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 02:17 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Remember how Haiti totally had a way to force companies to stay in Haiti and not just move, destroying the economy? And that isa baf thing. A country should adopt China's policy so it can start using the technology that the companies use.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 02:26 |
|
Fulchrum posted:You honestly think these were skilled workers in a specialized factory? Oh lol you think its a good thing that the Haitians starve. Sure you shouldn't be in the libertarian thread? Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 03:39 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 03:37 |
|
Fulchrum posted:And we're right back to "How dare they think they can tell us the truth? gently caress them forever!" Also lol now saying its fine to lie about keeping rights away from Gays because of cowardice.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 05:12 |
|
Fulchrum posted:So you are appreciative that they never once promised single payer coverage knowing that it could never ever happen, and thus never broke their promise? When you have to get an opposition funded group to force your hand then no you're not actually doing what you can. You know like the LCR forcing Obama's hand.Loom I know to cancerous sociopaths like yourself letting people suffer is good. but for normal humans like me who make up 99% of the population that is terrible. Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 05:31 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 05:27 |
|
Fulchrum posted:And right on time we have the nazi propaganda spewer giving full credit for civil rights advances to Republicans. Wanna follow it up with "Lincoln was a Republican" next? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States Hey I just tell it as it went down. Cancer.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 05:32 |
|
VitalSigns posted:No it's a pretty good analogy. Well we should always love the liberals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u52Oz-54VYw
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 05:49 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Show me quote containing the words "Gay marriage should and will never happen". Do it. Don't repost Dems saying their personal view is that marriage is between a man and a woman, because that's just thought policing absent any active attempt to stop it. The Dems have been defined as the party who think you don't legislate according to your personal feelings on an issue but what the facts state, and you're attempting to claim that dem personal beliefs completely overrode that tendency and that they fought against gay marriage. Nope they just claim something cannot be done because it won't solve all the problems. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG7w3Oey3xs Squalid posted:I was surprised to find out the biggest change in the Democratic party over the last decade has been how it become much less moderate and more (American) liberal. The change was largely subtractive, with the Blue Dogs of old being replaced with Republicans. I doubt this trend is likely to continue much longer, but I feel this is a strange and unsettled political moment we live in.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 05:59 |
|
Kilroy posted:JeffersonClay and Fulchrum have got to be the most effective advocates against the Democratic party I've ever heard of. I think I'd rather vote straight-ticket socialist for the rest of my miserable life and just let the GOP rule supreme forever, if it meant I wouldn't have to make the same mark on ballot as either of these two. For gently caress's sake - you're both just awful people, each in your own way. I disagree. It is better we work the ground game. Tu purify the party, so that the cancers will vote for the Republicans.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 06:16 |
|
khwarezm posted:Oh gently caress off with this, if you've been looking at Syria for the last four years and think Assad and what he represents isn't 99% of the reason the country is in such a disaster then you are a god damned fool. He probably has more blood on his hand than any political leader in power today and frankly the continued presence of despots like him will ensure the Middle East remains unstable for decades to come. Well then best we give guns to wahabist rebels aligned with AQ then.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 06:22 |
|
Squalid posted:The voice of the People isn't exactly how I'd describe the modern Democratic Party. . . Well its certainly not that when it argues for more hand jobs for the ultra rich. Also lol now Fulchrum is making the same argument the Neocons use to start wars in the Middle East. Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 08:03 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 08:00 |
|
Ah now Iran is like the Nazis.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 08:04 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Ah, so you are admitting that military action to stop the Nazis is justified.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 08:11 |
|
Forces in Iran unlike our best budds outside of Israel in the middle east didn't sponsor 9/11. Remind me why are we not invading them?
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 08:27 |
|
JeffersonClay posted:No crowsbeak has literally said he doesn't give a poo poo about non-american workers and shouldn't have to, so kvetching about the Haitian minimum wage from him is pretty drat rich. I don't give a drat about people who you're suggesting we give jobs by destroying American jobs. On the other hand if people in a foreign country are organizing for better conditions and the USA prevents that I am not about to suggest we destroy their livelihoods.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 16:58 |
|
Ogmius815 posted:So I hear this is the new tankie thread c/d? I don't want to get caught with my pants down not praising such glorious champions of anti-imperialism as putinist Russia and Iran. Wait, who was praising Kruschev's crushing a worker revolt here? Also, Jefferson Clay its saying its fine to let Haitians live in misery.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 18:15 |
|
Oh hey Jefferson Clay is now making the republicans.txt argument against minimum wage increases.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 18:52 |
|
Fulchrum posted:
Wait is fulchrum like doing a parody of himself now?
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 20:33 |
|
Fulchrum posted:I'm not the one who cares desperately enough what Nazis want me to think that I check Breitbart constantly to see what Nazi propaganda I need to be spewing everywhere. You're the one who keeps making Breitbart talking points about Iran, and Keith Ellison. Plus you hate the minimum wage.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 20:51 |
|
Yeah a whole lot of people called you out for wanting war with Iran.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 21:21 |
|
I will now summarize a Fulchrum post. "YOU"RE A BREITBART READER FOR NOT SUPPORTING HILLARY A HUNDRED PERCENT, ALSO YOU'RE A STUPID POOPY PANTS. "
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2017 21:55 |
|
Current Affiars has a great article about purifying the party. I think you may all enjoy this. https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/02/after-the-dnc-what-now
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2017 00:09 |
|
Ah its going to be fun watching her get booed whenever a Senator dumb enough to allow her to go to any event attended by the public has her endorse them at such an event. Also it will be fun to see you all then rant against people being against the idiot whop lost to Trump.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2017 18:37 |
|
I'd like to hear what establishment support did Bernie have Mainpainframe.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2017 07:52 |
|
MPF are you going to backup your comments?
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2017 16:57 |
|
DeadlyMuffin posted:What's baddem? I'm pointing out what I saw. I, with my own eyes, saw some pretty misogynistic poo poo from Bernie supporters directed at Hillary. I don't think Bernie supporters were much of a factor in her loss, but as a woman who cares about politics it was pretty depressing to see. According to a Fox news poll he is the most popular politician in America. http://www.teenvogue.com/story/fox-news-poll-bernie-sanders-planned-parenthood-donald-trump Also wasn't that guy from the Wire pretty misogynistic when he assaulted that Sander's supporter? or are you just making poo poo up like typical centrists to whine about supposed misogyny when really you just want lower taxes and to pay less for avacados. Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 21:26 on Mar 19, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 19, 2017 21:18 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:As usual, Hillary Clinton is a coward who does nothing but make excuses and refuse to face up to her own culpability for her loss, and Bernie Sanders is a flawless angel who was utterly cheated and robbed by the insurmountable power of the weak and pathetic centrists who are literally incapable of winning elections. Now please answer my question. How did Bernie have establishment support? Also I am more then happy to continue the fight to ensure centrist sociopaths are marginalized or purged from the party.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2017 00:53 |
|
TO the lefties here who say this battle is winnable, I say it is. If it wasn't Perez wouldn't have had to dirty deal to win, if it was, we wouldn't be taking over state parties, if it was we wouldn't have Machin running scared, if it was, Bernie wouldn't be so popular. We can do this, this will of course mean ensuring our enemies like BI NOW, like JC, like Fulchrum are made to never ever again want to vote for us. BUt it can be done. That really is a crime against humanity. Oh and this sums up the thought processes of the enemies. Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 08:46 on Mar 21, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 21, 2017 06:39 |
|
TyrantWD posted:The fact that someone like Feingold lost, and by a larger amount than Hillary lost by in Wisconsin shows you how far right/left the country really is. Anyone who thinks Democrats lost because the party was too centrist, and a true liberal would have cleaned house needs to look at the Wisconsin senate race and see how nonsense that idea is. Probablynot a good idea to run the same guy who lsot again. Especially when he can be attacked as the architect of Obamacare.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2017 17:03 |
|
I'm sorry JC but thats just how its going to be because Clintonites have shown now the the Gorusch hearings to be inherently the enemies of the American workers and need to be put on the run. I am sorry you seem to think its horrible we want the rich to pay their fair share. I am sorry you think its horrible that we expect the banking system to not screw those wanting to buy houses. I am sorry you are against people getting good wages. Actually I am not. I want you to join the GOP because that's where those who only live for greed belong. Oh and @ WJ well that could have been handled by Clinton being from the start against TPP, acknowledging that NAFTA didn't work, promising Medicare for all, and promising to break up the big banks. But we know for rather obvious reasons she never would have been. Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 19:25 on Mar 21, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 21, 2017 19:21 |
|
JeffersonClay posted:Electing Donald trump has already resulted in a significant, measurable increase in bigotry. You can't legislate an end to racism. It's about culture, too, and a country's leadership is an important component of the transmission and modification of culture. So her platform was a modified form of the democrats in 2010, and 2014. "We're the nice guys, and not the assholes". Didn't work it turns out, who would have thought?
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2017 19:42 |
|
JeffersonClay posted:The campaign slogan was stronger together, that's clearly about defending pluralism. She spoke at length about a positive American exceptionalism, where embracing our diversity was a core strength of the country. She contrasted Trump's sexism with the symbolism of electing the first woman president. She contrasted his racism and islamophobia with protecting and expanding the gains made in Obama's presidency. Hmmmm... Maybe it had something to do with you're sainted Hillary not actually covering policy in her ads. http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/8/14848636/hillary-clinton-tv-ads
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2017 19:56 |
|
Remember you are an extremist if you don't support yemenis getting bombed by Saidi Arabia.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2017 03:28 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 11:34 |
|
Frijolero posted:Pelosi on Anderson Cooper Yeah i say our revolution is going to have to work as a parelal organization against the dnc.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2017 17:27 |